Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

If there is election fraud via black box, who is controlling it?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
trumad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-13-06 06:22 PM
Original message
If there is election fraud via black box, who is controlling it?
Is there some sort of black ops behind a curtain that controls the levers/software?

Is it Rove? Who's the matermind?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Warren Stupidity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-13-06 06:53 PM
Response to Original message
1. The companies that make the boxes.
And/or people working on the design and implementation of direct recording electronic devices. Of the three companies making most of the equipment (Diebold, Sequoia and ES&S) two of them are headed by the same family (O'Dell,) and that family is heavily connected to the Republican Party.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JackRiddler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-13-06 07:02 PM
Response to Original message
2. Interesting but ultimately irrelevant question...
The fundamental point must be that black box voting makes perfect election fraud possible - i.e., fraud with almost no chance of being caught. If there is no paper trail or any means of confirming a count, and if the software itself is proprietary and secret even from the purchasing client (i.e., the government), then that is necessarily unreliable because there is a gateway for fraud.

One might prove statistically that fraud must have been committed (for example by finding incredible discrepancies between districts with and without particular machines, as was the case in 2004), but establishing the who and how (of many possible pathways to a hack) might be impossible.

Based on the 2004 evidence, whoever did it preferred Bush. This can be effected by the company owners, moles within the company, or (less likely) highly sophisticated outside hackers.

But it's irrelevant - the machines should be done away with altogether because they allow for an unprecedented quality of fraud.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeFree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-13-06 07:03 PM
Response to Original message
3. Rove is
Being that nearly every vote goes through a computer system, nearly every vote is subject to change. On election night 2004, Rove is pictured at a bank of computers at a time when the NSA was tapping any telephone line they wanted. Change a few numbers here, a few hundred there as the numbers cross modems, and viola! pretty soon it adds up to some big numbers.

At your voting precinct, the black box is controlled not by elected or appointed government officials. It is controlled by the programmmers who work for private companies. That means the very core of our democracy is run not by government but by corporations. Corporations that are not under oath to protect the constitution.

The gist of your OP is correct: behind a curtain. We need to look behind that curtain, eh?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Generic Other Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-13-06 07:25 PM
Response to Original message
4. If it's like a virus someone programs into the machine
every person who puts a new card in the machine or downloads the company's software inadvertantly starts the funny counts in motion. Doesn't the company use cards that allow the machines to set up for new elections. They always have to be changed in some fashion for every election, so the fraud is nearly impossible to detect. You might not even know you did it.

And didn't that GOP guy named Feeney in Florida ask Clint (forgetting his last name) for some kind of backdoor way to hack the machines? That suggests Repubs and company are in on it. Don't forget CEO O'Dell vowing to deliver the vote for Bush. They seem to have the unscrupulous deals going on all over.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 09:34 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC