Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login

I wonder. IS Iraq a failure for Bushco, or is the "civil war" there just

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
Dover Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-09-06 05:41 PM
Original message
I wonder. IS Iraq a failure for Bushco, or is the "civil war" there just
Edited on Mon Oct-09-06 06:24 PM by Dover
part of the plan?

Of course it would be difficult to answer for certain. Regardless of the political costs to the GOP due to the escalating violence in Iraq, there may be a larger purpose that, in their twisted minds, warrants it. For one thing it ensures that the U.S. will STAY in Iraq, in their huge new multi-million dollar bases, snuggled up to Iran, Syria and Turkey....right in the middle of things. And of course in close proximity to their latest pipeline/resource venture.

I suggest this because, lest we forget, there are "special recon regiments" who keep the pot stirred and initiate much of the violence, as slipped out during the Basra incident (documented below). It is only their overall end game that we are not entirely privy to, and so must speculate.

British Pseudo-Gang Terrorists Exposed in Basra

by Kurt Nimmo

September 24, 2005

Baghdad Dweller, writing for Uruknet, reports two British soldiers held by Iraqi authorities in Basra (also described as Shiite militiamen in the corporate media), and subsequently freed after the British stormed a police jail, were working undercover as bombers. Baghdad Dweller includes a link to the Washington Post, where the following appears: Iraqi security officials on Monday variously accused the two Britons they detained of shooting at Iraqi forces or trying to plant explosives. Photographs of the two men in custody showed them in civilian clothes. The Herald notes the following: Sources say the British soldiers, possibly members of the new Special Reconnaissance Regiment formed earlier this month to provide intelligence for SAS operations, were looking at infiltration of the citys police by the followers of the outspoken Shiite cleric, Moqtada al Sadr, thus admitting the soldiers worked undercover.

The Special Reconnaissance Regiment, according to, formed with HQ at Hereford from volunteers of other units to support international expeditionary operations in the fight against international terrorism, absorbing 14th Intelligence Company (formed for operations against Ulster terrorists), Intelligence Corps, and releasing the SAS and SBS for the hard end of missions. Is it possible the hard end of the mission in Iraq is to discredit the resistance and sow chaos in the country by fronting pseudo-gang terrorist groups (or the variant pseudo-guerilla operations), as the British have ample experience with elsewhere, notably in Kenya during the Mau Mau uprising and in Malaya? Pseudo operations are those in which government forces disguised as guerrillas, normally along with guerrilla defectors, operate as teams to infiltrate insurgent areas, writes Lawrence E. Cline for the U.S. Army War College External Research Associates Program. This technique has been used by the security forces of several other countries in their operations, and typically it has been very successful. Indeed, one long running pseudo op, Gladio, was so successful it managed to render a nominal Italian terrorist group, the Red Brigades (Brigate Rosse), into an excuse (after proper infiltration by agents provocateurs) to increase the power of reactionary forces in Italy and discredit socialist, communist, and even labor movements.

The British SAS honed its counter-insurgency techniques in Northern Ireland...cont'd ...


Iraq "Terrorists" Are British Special Forces
The Insider, September 20, 2005

British soldiers have been caught posing as Arabs and shooting Iraqis in the occupied city of Basra in southern Iraq. A group of them was caught yesterday by Iraqi police. They were driving an Iraqi car, wearing Arab clothing, and carrying weapons and explosives.

The Iraqi police were patrolling the area looking for suspected "terrorists" or "insurgents", and they noticed that the men were acting suspiciously. Suddenly, without warning, the suspicious men started shooting at people, but the new Iraqi security forces managed to capture some of them before they could escape. Obviously, if these men had not been caught, the mass media would now be reporting the incident as just another attempt by evil "terrorists" to create civil war in Iraq.

There have been a number of incidents in this area and throughout Iraq in which police and civilians have been targeted and killed by "terrorists" or "insurgents". But this is the first time that any of those responsible have been caught in the act, and it is now clear that at least some of them are working directly for the occupying forces, as many Iraqis have openly suspected all along.

A few days ago, in a statement unreported in the corporate mass media, Iran's most senior military official specifically linked the instability in Iraq with agents of the US and its allies: "we have information that the insecurity has its roots in the activities of American and Israeli spies."

The post-war violence in Iraq is always been blamed on "Islamic extremists" or "rival ethnic factions". Yet in the history of the country, nothing like this has ever happened before. The problems began precisely when the US and UK seized control.

The Iraqi police arrested the men and put them in prison. Unfortunately the police never had a chance to question the men and find out exactly what they were doing, because within minutes the UK sent in six tanks and an elite SAS unit to break their terrorists out of jail...cont'd ...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-09-06 05:42 PM
Response to Original message
1. Halliburton's still raking in the cash
isn't it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Dover Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-09-06 06:03 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Yes, they are MANY multi-national corporations who are 'invested'
in this 'war'. And I'm not yet convinced that this policy isn't bipartisan or a-political. The national budget continues to be poured into this black hole as well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Jan 19th 2018, 03:33 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC