Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

WORLD NUT DAILY REJECTS REPUBLICAN PARTY!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
janx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-02-06 08:59 PM
Original message
WORLD NUT DAILY REJECTS REPUBLICAN PARTY!
This column is going to make me very unpopular with Republicans.

I don't care. It must be said.

Following the revelations about Florida Rep. Mark Foley's sexually suggestive e-mails to a 16-year-old congressional page, I have concluded Republicans are unworthy of retaining control of the federal government.

I sincerely regret this is the case.


More at:

http://www.wnd.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=52235
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
swag Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-02-06 09:00 PM
Response to Original message
1. In other words, stay home and don't vote, assholes.
Do it in droves.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShortnFiery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-02-06 09:01 PM
Response to Original message
2. Unbelievable! I'm pinching myself.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
janx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-02-06 09:03 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. I know! First the Moonie Times calls for Hastert to resign,
and now this!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
davidinalameda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-02-06 09:02 PM
Response to Original message
3. he's right
doesn't make him any less of a wingnut though
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rainscents Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-02-06 09:03 PM
Response to Original message
4. Oh, boy... When it rain, it pores!!!
LOL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Viva_La_Revolution Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-02-06 09:03 PM
Response to Original message
6. the nut has turned
:wow:


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
janx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-02-06 10:15 PM
Response to Reply #6
22. WING
NUTZ have TURNED! :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
boolean Donating Member (992 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-02-06 09:05 PM
Response to Original message
7. Why does it take a sex scandal?
NOW they abandon the GOP?

I hate these fuckers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bridgit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-02-06 09:05 PM
Response to Original message
8. shit i've been saying that for years...
republicans are incapable of civil governance :rofl: :thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Systematic Chaos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-02-06 09:05 PM
Response to Original message
9. WTF is this?
"Democrats, of course, are so disingenuous in their righteous indignation about Foley. When they were in charge, they allowed Rep. Barney Frank to run a homosexual call-boy ring out of his Capitol office. And they allowed Rep. Gerry Studds to get away with an actual affair with an underage male congressional page. Like Frank, the unrepentant Studds was re-elected by his perverse constituents until he retired in 1996."

I understand that there are going to be screw-ups in our party also, but are these things true or just BS? Anyone?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
roamer65 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-02-06 09:12 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. Tell them to stop ignoring the present issue...
Edited on Mon Oct-02-06 09:14 PM by roamer65
being is this what you expect as leadership from the Rethug party? Anyway, from what I remember on Studds, the Dem party came clean and didn't cover it up like the present Rethug leadership has with Foley.

Like Tricky Dick said, its the lie that will get you. Is this what the Rethug party promised in their "Contract on America"????
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Old and In the Way Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-02-06 09:24 PM
Response to Reply #10
17. Studds was censured along with a Republican at the time.
Crane, the Republican, was nailed with an underage female. So the 2 things "balanced out" so to speak. It was a bi-partisan deal. Republicans forget to mention that part.

It's not the sexual orientation, it's the cover-up for political advantage.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GOPNotForMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-02-06 09:13 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. Don't know about Franks, but Studds story is definitely true. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tocqueville Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-02-06 09:15 PM
Response to Reply #9
13. Gerry Studds story is different, but still reprehensible
1983 Congressional page sex scandal
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
The 1983 Congressional page sex scandal was a political scandal in the United States involving members of the United States House of Representatives.

On July 14, 1983 the House Ethics Committee concluded that Rep. Dan Crane (R-Ill.) and Rep. Gerry Studds (D-Mass.) had engaged in sexual relationships with minors, specifically 17-year-old congressional pages. In Crane's case, it was a 1980 relationship with a female page and in Studds's case, it was a 1973 relationship with a male page. Both representatives immediately pleaded guilty to the charges and the committee decided to simply reprimand the two.

However, Rep. Newt Gingrich (R-Ga.) demanded their expulsion. On July 20, 1983 the House voted for censure, the first time that censure had been imposed for sexual misconduct. Crane, who tearfully apologized for his transgression, lost his bid for reelection in 1984.

Studds, however, stood by the facts of the case and refused to apologize for his ephebophiliac behavior, and even turned his back and ignored the censure being read to him. He called a press conference with the former page, in which both stated that the child, who was 17, consented. Studds had taken the child to Morocco to engage in sexual activity, and therefore did not break any U.S. laws in what he called a "private relationship."<1> He continued to be reelected until his retirement in 1996.<2>
___________________________________________________________________________________
he didn't speak about Crane either


Frank is a prominent figure in the liberal wing of the Democratic Party, and has been outspoken on many human rights issues, as well as on issues of gay and lesbian rights. In 1987, he spoke publicly about his homosexuality for the first time. He said in a 1996 interview: "I'm used to being in the minority. I'm a left-handed gay Jew. I've never felt, automatically, a member of any majority."

In 1990, the House voted to reprimand Frank when it was revealed that Steve Gobie was running a prostitution business from Frank's apartment. Frank had dismissed Gobie earlier that year after learning of Gobie's activities.

The Boston Globe, among others, called on Frank to resign, but he refused. The House Ethics Committee recommended Frank be reprimanded because he "reflected discredit upon the House" by using his congressional office to fix 33 of Gobie's parking tickets. Attempts to expel or censure Frank failed; instead the House voted 408-18 to reprimand him. This condemnation was not reflected in Frank's district, where he won re-election in 1990 with 66 percent of the vote, and has won by larger margins ever since.

In 1995, Majority leader Dick Armey made a stir when he referred to Frank as "Barney Fag" in a press interview. Armey apologized and claimed it was a slip of the tongue.

In 1998, he founded the National Stonewall Democrats, the national gay, lesbian, bisexual, and transgender Democratic organization.

In 2004, a survey of Capitol Hill staffers published in Washingtonian magazine gave Frank the title of the most intelligent Democratic member of the House of Representatives. In the same survey he was also listed as the funniest member of the House.<1>

In 2006, Frank provoked the ire of Veteran's Groups as one of only three Representatives to oppose the Respect for America's Fallen Heroes Act.

The Frank Rule
During a GOP campaign concerning homosexuality, Frank threatened to out a number of "gay-baiting" Republican fellow congressmen. He stated that it is unacceptable to out a closeted gay person, unless that person uses their power or notoriety to hurt gay people<2> Many members of the LGBT community adhere to this rule in their own relationships with prominent individuals.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barney_Frank
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Old and In the Way Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-02-06 09:29 PM
Response to Reply #13
20. If we used the Barney Frank threshold for corruption-
"using his congressional office to fix 33 of Gobie's parking tickets."

I'd say there'd be no Republican worthy to sit in Congress today.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tocqueville Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-02-06 09:37 PM
Response to Reply #20
21. yep that's the "Clinton syndrome"
a BJ is the end of the world while lying to start illegal wars or ratify torture etc... etcc.. is peanuts
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
skids Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-02-06 09:28 PM
Response to Reply #9
19. Frank's role in that was tangential.

The BFEE was in charge of that ring. Google "Franklin coverup" and wikipedia is your friend.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Swamp Rat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-02-06 09:14 PM
Response to Original message
12. BWAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!
:D

Fuck the GOP!



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
janx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-02-06 09:18 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. Can you believe it? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Swamp Rat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-02-06 09:22 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. Yes, because they are cannibals at heart.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
roamer65 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-02-06 09:23 PM
Response to Original message
16. The beginning of the end of the Rethuglican party
Edited on Mon Oct-02-06 09:24 PM by roamer65
I predict that the party will implode and not exist in two years. Raisinbrain will be the final nail in the coffin. I can see a "God" party of christofascists and either a centrist third party OR the ranks of DLC Dems will swell (ugh, yuk).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
janx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-02-06 09:26 PM
Response to Reply #16
18. If the 50-state strategy comes through--and I think it will--
we may see a large populist movement in the Dem party.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LTR Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-02-06 10:29 PM
Response to Original message
23. This is pretty damn big!
When I clicked on this thread, I thought it was just some anonymous hack posting a soon-to-be-deleted article.

But this is from Joseph Farah, the head nut himself.

My, hell must certainly be cold now. This is serious shit!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
janx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-02-06 10:34 PM
Response to Reply #23
24. YEP.
With the Moonie Times calling for Hastert's resignation, it's heavy shit indeed. The ship's going DOWN...

November will be an enormous change.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 02:17 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC