1. It hasn't. It's unconstitutional to suspend it so it goes to SC.
They will uphold it. The GOPs know this. Their real target was to slip through the provision giving BushInc immunity for PAST abuses.
By making the debate ABOUT Habeus Corpus they got all attention off Bush's weaseling for escape from accountability of his PAST criminality on the torturing of detainees.
I'm not holding my breath on that getting there, and I sure as shit don't trust them to stand in defense of something as quaint as the US Constitution if it does.
4. The point is that it will NOT be operable till it IS adjudicated, and that
the REAL purpose of putting the Habeus Corpus debate out there was to distract from the REAL purpose of the bill - to protect Bush from prosecution for past torture of detainees.
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion
board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules
page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the
opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent
the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.