Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

NY Post: Bubba Goes Ballistic on ABC About 9-11 Movie

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
RamboLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-07-06 08:55 AM
Original message
NY Post: Bubba Goes Ballistic on ABC About 9-11 Movie
http://www.nypost.com/news/nationalnews/bubba_goes_ballistic_on_abc_about_its_damning_9_11_movie_nationalnews_ian_bishop_________post_correspondent.htm

A furious Bill Clinton is warning ABC that its mini-series "The Path to 9/11" grossly misrepresents his pursuit of Osama bin Laden - and he is demanding the network "pull the drama" if changes aren't made.

Clinton pointedly refuted several fictionalized scenes that he claims insinuate he was too distracted by the Monica Lewinsky sex scandal to care about bin Laden and that a top adviser pulled the plug on CIA operatives who were just moments away from bagging the terror master, according to a letter to ABC boss Bob Iger obtained by The Post.

The former president also disputed the portrayal of then-Secretary of State Madeleine Albright as having tipped off Pakistani officials that a strike was coming, giving bin Laden a chance to flee.

"The content of this drama is factually and incontrovertibly inaccurate and ABC has the duty to fully correct all errors or pull the drama entirely," the four-page letter said.

<snip>

The letter, written by Bruce Lindsey, head of the Clinton Foundation, and Douglas Bond, a top lawyer in Clinton's office, accuses the ABC drama of "bias" and a "fictitious rewriting of history that will be misinterpreted by millions of Americans."



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
KoKo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-07-06 08:56 AM
Response to Original message
1. Great News! Finally he speaks out...! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
acmavm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-07-06 08:56 AM
Response to Original message
2. Good. He needed, for the benefit of the country, to dispute this
farce.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-07-06 08:57 AM
Response to Original message
3. Great!
Glad he spoke up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ixion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-07-06 08:57 AM
Response to Original message
4. good... he should sue for slander, IMO
http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=slander&x=0&y=0

slan‧der  /ˈslændər/ Pronunciation Key - Show Spelled Pronunciation Pronunciation Key - Show IPA Pronunciation
–noun
1. defamation; calumny: rumors full of slander.
2. a malicious, false, and defamatory statement or report: a slander against his good name.
3. Law. defamation by oral utterance rather than by writing, pictures, etc.
–verb (used with object)
4. to utter slander against; defame.
–verb (used without object)
5. to utter or circulate slander.


Which is exactly what this 'docudrama' is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-07-06 08:58 AM
Response to Original message
5. Clinton needs to do a 2hr press conference where he answers every question
about terrorism and his efforts.

He needed to do it after the 9-11 report came out - instead he allowed the GOPs to spin 9-11 against him and every other Democrat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LongTomH Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-07-06 07:37 PM
Response to Reply #5
36. And if he did?
He might get some coverage from the foreign press and some progressive bloggers; but, the Corporate Media in this country? Cue the crickets!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-08-06 08:37 AM
Response to Reply #36
43. HE can command cameras like no other Democrat can as the subject of the
controversy and as ex-president. He is not without some influence thru his own knowledge gained about these companies and he knows where they can be coerced. He hasn't used this influence for any other Democrat, but, I am quite certain he is willing NOW to use it for his own protection.

It's PAST time he do this, as EVERY Dem candidate in 2002, 2004, 2006 is being hung with the Democrats are weak on terror meme that he allowed to fester with his silence all these years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Atman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-07-06 08:59 AM
Response to Original message
6. They pulled Reagan. They pulled the gay priest. They won't pull this.
Betcha.

Liberal media, remember?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Julius Civitatus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-07-06 09:00 AM
Response to Reply #6
10. They pulled Michael Moore's "Fahrenheit 9/11" too
They sure are showing their agenda. It's obvious.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hugin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-07-06 09:05 AM
Response to Reply #10
12. Didn't they also pull that Tom Hanks movie? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
druidity33 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-07-06 07:56 PM
Response to Reply #12
37. mazes and monsters?
are you talking about that D&D movie from the 80's that fundies though was "Satanic"? If so, that's a LONG time ago. I think it was Mazes and Monsters, but i could be wrong...

was that Tom Hanks? ok now i'm confused...

:shrug:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Julius Civitatus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-07-06 08:59 AM
Response to Original message
7. "Bungle Bubba"??? The NY Post sucks!
Edited on Thu Sep-07-06 09:02 AM by Julius Civitatus
They are a bunch of fascist neocon tabloid pricks. Even this they have to pepper with anti-Clinton snides.

:mad:


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RamboLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-07-06 09:11 AM
Response to Reply #7
15. That's why I didn't post in LBN - but still even the wingnuts
now know that this portrayal is being disputed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jacobin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-07-06 09:00 AM
Response to Original message
8. Fucking Fascist Propaganda
That old 'librul' media again.

:argh:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NashVegas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-07-06 09:10 AM
Response to Reply #8
14. Yes, But the Interesting Part Is At the Bottom
The 9/11 commission report echoes his denial, and found that Clinton's Cabinet gave "its blessing" for a CIA plan to capture bin Laden and determined that ex-CIA Director George Tenet squashed the plan.

The third contested scene focuses on Albright, who is depicted alerting Pakistani officials in advance of a 1998 U.S. missile strike against bin Laden in Afghanistan - over the objections of the Pentagon. The movie claims the tip-off allowed bin Laden to escape.

But the 9/11 commission reported that it was a member of the U.S. Joint Chiefs of Staff - not Albright - who met with a senior Pakistani Army official prior to the strike to "assure him the missiles were not coming from India."



And it's actually more of a defense of the Clinton admin than almost everything else I've seen, even on some Liberal blogs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cobalt Violet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-07-06 09:00 AM
Response to Original message
9. K & R.
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TacticalPeek Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-07-06 09:02 AM
Response to Original message
11. K & Fn R!
:kick: :kick: :kick:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Avalux Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-07-06 09:06 AM
Response to Original message
13. Thank you Bill.
I understand your legacy is at stake also - I hope you hold a press conference and blow this crap out of the water.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madokie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-07-06 09:11 AM
Response to Original message
16. Good, the Big Dawg Barks
showing some teeth,
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goclark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-07-06 09:41 AM
Response to Reply #16
27. Maybe his good daddy poppy will support Bill on this ~


Now he'll really see who his friends are.

I love Clinton but his "friend" Poppy is a snake.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madokie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-07-06 12:21 PM
Response to Reply #27
30. nothing wrong with having a pet snake
as long as you always know where it is
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SheWhoMustBeObeyed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-07-06 11:09 PM
Response to Reply #30
41. Keep your friends close and your enemies closer
:thumbsup:

I love me some Bubba.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluestateguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-07-06 09:14 AM
Response to Original message
17. Well he spoke out. This is what everybody wanted.
So this will either be the catalyst for removing the movie (doubtful), or giving it even more attention, and thus a ratings buzz.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-07-06 09:16 AM
Response to Original message
18. I'm hoping those "millions of Americans" are
smarter than your average sheep and can tell when they're being bullshitted by the neoCON wing of the right wing insane asylum.

The dangerous precedent here is abc not qualifying this piece of fictional trash.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Julius Civitatus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-07-06 09:25 AM
Response to Reply #18
22. Don't bank on it...
:eyes:

If we are to believe the election results of 2000 and 2004, about half the US population voted for Bush. I wouldn't put my money on the American people (in general) being able to "tell when they're being bullshitted by the neoCON wing of the right wing insane asylum." Sorry for my cynicism, but I'm yet to see evidence of the contrary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OPERATIONMINDCRIME Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-07-06 09:17 AM
Response to Original message
19. This Is EXACTLY What We Need.
The more negative publicity we can get from high profile figures about the movie the more americans will either choose not to watch it or know going in to take what they see with a grain of salt.

No matter what we try and do, ABC will air this. What is important is getting the message out to as many as possible that what they will see should be questioned and not taken at face value. The more Clinton speaks about this, the more people will know that the series itself isn't factual and is just simply partisan.

I hope he continues to speak out and get even more vocal about the injustice of this program.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-07-06 09:45 AM
Response to Reply #19
28. Clinton should go to all the
high schools, too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
melissinha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-07-06 09:19 AM
Response to Original message
20. Claiming to be based on 911 Commission is crux
They don't back down from their claim to be based on 911 Comission, and that is were they should be hounded on.... hiding behind the word "dramatization" does not change the fact that if aired it will alter the perception of the truth of several viewers.....

we need to hound them on the the refutability of their claim that it was based on the 911 Commission...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Triana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-07-06 09:20 AM
Response to Original message
21. "too distracted by Lewinsky" - that's the Republican meme...
...was then. Is now.

This, folks, is pure propaganda being shoved down our throats.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ignacio Upton Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-07-06 04:09 PM
Response to Reply #21
33. That "meme" is Orwellian
Since THOSE ASSHOLES were criticizing Clinton for bombing Al Qaida training camps in reaction to the East African Embassy attacks as "wag the dog."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LaurenG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-07-06 09:25 AM
Response to Original message
23. Well I'm mad at Clinton right now
It made him look bad so he said something but the last 6 years he's ignored everything else bush has done since 9/11.

Like I said I'm mad at him. I'll get over it but sheesh. :(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Backlash Cometh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-07-06 09:25 AM
Response to Original message
24. There is definitely a public interest here. The right-wing has a strong
precedent of using misinformation to confuse the public so they can capitalize on their redirected conclusions. We have Iraq and two Bush Administration terms to show that damage is caused by this misuse of the media. ABC created its own problems when it called it an objective show based on the 9/11 Commission report. It opened the door for serious criticism. I say it's time to cross the Rubicon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProfessorGAC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-07-06 09:32 AM
Response to Original message
25. His Statement Says "Drama"
I think that's clever use of language. He does not bestow the "docu" prefix to it, therefore adding zero credibility to any of it.

Pretty smart to keep calling it a "drama". I think most people have some equivalence of "drama" with "fiction".
The Professor
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-08-06 08:16 AM
Response to Reply #25
42. If it were advertised as fiction, there'd be hardly any problem with it
It'd just be odd to produce a work of fiction about such a serious historic event.

The problem with it is that it's advertised as a docu-drama, supposedly telling a dramatized version of reality, while it does in fact tell fiction.

Fantasizing and calling it dramatization, amounts to no less than lying. If people think it's supposed to be fiction, they won't realize how serious it is that it tells fiction.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NVMojo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-07-06 09:37 AM
Response to Original message
26. YAY!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
w4rma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-07-06 10:33 AM
Response to Original message
29. Interesting that the NY Post got the scoop on this story. (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
indepat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-07-06 01:18 PM
Response to Original message
31. Hope Bubba shoots huge rockets up mucho arses
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MasonJar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-07-06 04:05 PM
Response to Original message
32. It is outrageous that Tom Kean is supporting this after he goofed
so badly on the report. His son was on tv saying that he was against some Bush policy. That will change in a hurry if he beats Mendendez. These Pugs are all liars, prevaricators, equivocators and rapers of the truth. Sue them, Bill.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ignacio Upton Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-07-06 04:09 PM
Response to Reply #32
34. Kean Jr. also wants to privatize Social Security
That alone shows he's no moderate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtomicKitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-07-06 04:12 PM
Response to Original message
35. Hooray for Bubba.
And to all those prematurely trash-talking Clinton for not doing anything about this travesty when the story broke, I hope this is a lesson to let events unfold. I knew there was no way in hell Clinton was going to remain silent when his integrity was being impugned by these assclowns.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-07-06 07:58 PM
Response to Original message
38. So now we know, Big Dog just takes awhile to get moving.
Like an 18-wheeler. Good to see him swearing off the kool-aid.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
progressoid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-07-06 10:48 PM
Response to Original message
39. Well - technically his people go ballistic.
It was written by...Bruce Lindsey, head of the Clinton Foundation, and Douglas Bond, a top lawyer in Clinton's office
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SammyWinstonJack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-07-06 10:51 PM
Response to Reply #39
40. With his blessings, I'll wager.
You think President Clinton isn't completely pissed over this?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 06:51 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC