Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Karl OFFERS TO HELP LIEBERMAN. Not a joke.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
yodermon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-09-06 01:07 PM
Original message
Karl OFFERS TO HELP LIEBERMAN. Not a joke.
:wow:
George Stephanopoulos: Can Karl help Joe?

According to a close Lieberman adviser, the President's political guru, Karl Rove, has reached out to the Lieberman camp with a message straight from the Oval Office: "The boss wants to help. Whatever we can do, we will do."


http://abcnews.blogs.com/theworldnewser/

found via firedoglake: http://www.firedoglake.com/2006/08/09/the-new-math/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
jsamuel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-09-06 01:08 PM
Response to Original message
1. Bush endorses Lieberman
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oceansaway Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-09-06 01:09 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. must have been that kiss.....n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
walldude Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-09-06 03:14 PM
Response to Reply #5
59. Bwhahaha The kiss of death!! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bananas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-09-06 01:38 PM
Response to Reply #1
36. Permalink to the abcnews blog item
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Critters2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-09-06 01:08 PM
Response to Original message
2. So now he's *'s favorite Independent? eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gully Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-09-06 01:08 PM
Response to Original message
3. Does that mean Bush will campaign for Lieberman instead of the Republican
candidate, or that they'll help him be a "spoiler?" I think I know the answer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
insane_cratic_gal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-09-06 01:13 PM
Response to Reply #3
16. Yes
because the Republican candidate can't win CT.. They know this.. so better to keep Joe the Lap dog then empower the the people of CT and the democratic party by allowing Lamont in.


Lamont used some very strong words against this administration last night during his acceptance speech. He's the newest head of the party and people are paying attention. Lieberman hasn't spoken badly about Bush (ever)

Now will Bush show up to campaign for him, probably not.. but lets pay close attention to who and with what pac donates to Lieberman's campaign.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
long_green Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-09-06 01:16 PM
Response to Reply #16
25. Fighting for Joe is the best way to hurt the Dems in November
If this is legit, it means that the urgency of getting Joe out of the race is greater than I thought.

A vote (or a check) for Joe is a vote for George W. Bush.

Get the message out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gully Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-09-06 01:32 PM
Response to Reply #16
35. I want to see an all out endorsement from *. If he's "supporting"
Lieberman, his support must go beyond how they supported Nader.

I think a Republican may win if the Dem vote is divided, and that is their intent - no doubt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AndyA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-09-06 01:09 PM
Response to Original message
4. Big surprise there. They can snuggle up together someplace private
and make campaign plans. Bush can whisper them into Joe's ear while they're making out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberal N proud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-09-06 01:09 PM
Response to Original message
6. That justifies yesterdays actions.
The fact that KKKarl is reaching out to help him after he has been defeated signifies just how important Joe was to the regime.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hippiechick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-09-06 01:09 PM
Response to Original message
7. Of course he does - divide and conquer.
Splitting the opposition party is the only way the GOP can guarantee a win (Diebold excluded, of course) ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skidmore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-09-06 01:10 PM
Response to Original message
8. Wonder if there was a similar memo to Nader?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sir Jeffrey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-09-06 01:10 PM
Response to Original message
9. Good thing he ran against Bush in 2000 right?
Makes you wonder just how close Bush and Lieberman really are.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
long_green Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-09-06 01:13 PM
Response to Reply #9
17. What was Al Gore thinking?
It gets harder to figure that out everyday.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sir Jeffrey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-09-06 01:18 PM
Response to Reply #17
28. "The Clinton Factor"...
Al thought he needed to distance himself from the Clenis scandals. In doing so, he did what our side usually does: listen to stupid dinosaur advisors like Shrum, Cahill, Brazille, etc.

How these professional losers continue to get any work is beyond me.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jim Lane Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-09-06 02:09 PM
Response to Reply #28
48. In defense of Gore's 2000 VP choice
First, Gore was acting on Lieberman's record then, which didn't include support for a war of aggression against Iraq. I think the general consensus is that Lieberman has moved to the right since 2000.

Second, Gore's strategy of wanting to distance himself from the Clinton scandals had some merit too it. I persnally think Gore carried it too far by not being emphatic enough in identifying himself with the substantive achievements of the Clinton administration. The choice of Lieberman, who had criticized Clinton on personal grounds while largely supporting his program, could've helped Gore draw that distinction, which was the right approach for many swing voters.

Third, the Gore/Lieberman ticket received more votes for President/Vice President than any other ticket ever had.

Fourth, Lieberman was popular with Florida's large ex-Northern population, especially the Jews. Without Lieberman on the ticket, Gore might well have actually lost Florida.

Of course, if Gore had picked Kerry instead, maybe Kerry's over-the-border strength would have picked up the few additional votes needed to swing New Hampshire. Then Gore would've been inaugurated regardless of what happened in Florida. We'll never know. But let's not carry the anti-Lieberman backlash so far that we apply obvious hindsight to criticize Gore.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sir Jeffrey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-09-06 02:42 PM
Response to Reply #48
56. ...
Point 1: Lieberman started in politics as a centrist. As the country shifted to the right, so did he. Voting records are deceptive because many times votes cast are meaningless i.e. if something has no chance of passing, it is a safe vote...likewise if something is going to pass regardless, this is where professional moderates like Lieberman make their "principled stands". It is well known in politics that professional centrists have no political compass...as such, they will stab you in the back when they see the opportunity. CHoosing one as a running mate makes no sense.

Point 2: I wasn't indicating in my statement that avoiding the Clinton scandals was bad strategy. The Clinton Factor was the divide between job approval and personal approval. Read the polls from that era and you'll find that people liked CLinton's policies...they didn't like the Clenis.

My point was that choosing a center-right VP doesn't do anything as far as separating yourself from personal scandals. Gore keeps his pants on and I think that would have been enough. I blame his ignorant advisors for dressing him in "earth tones", telling him to pull his punches in the first debate, and making the election waaaaaaay too close when the competition is an illiterate with the worst resume for the presidency in history.

Point 3: And they just barely won the popular vote when all indicators should have led to a rout.

Point 4: And it is arguable that choosing Lieberman and staying in the center drove too many into supporting Nader. We'll never know.

Finally, I wasn't criticizing Gore. I was criticizing his professional loser advisors. I have great respect for Gore and I think if he'd been himself he would have wiped the floor with Bush.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
itzamirakul Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-09-06 01:28 PM
Response to Reply #17
30. I will always believe that the DLC made the choice of Lieberman
to run for vp and Gore was forced to accept.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ronnykmarshall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-09-06 01:53 PM
Response to Reply #17
46. Al's probably saying the same thing.
I wonder if Al will endorse Lamont?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fridays Child Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-09-06 01:11 PM
Response to Original message
10. Shameful.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KoKo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-09-06 02:11 PM
Response to Reply #10
50. Kind of confirms in my mind that Lieberman knows more about 2000 Election
than the Bushies want to let out. For Bush to go this far out says he's owed a favor back to Lieberman. Interesting....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
long_green Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-09-06 01:11 PM
Response to Original message
11. This is good news
This must be brought to light as soon as possible. Let Bush be seen offering a helping hand to Holy Joe and Lieberman's Democratic support will wither away even faster.
This could even have a boomerang effect with some of Connecticut's Republican voters.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Guaranteed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-09-06 01:42 PM
Response to Reply #11
39. ABSOLUTELY. Everything we can do to get the Repukes
publicly supporting Lieberman will help.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Generic Other Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-09-06 01:11 PM
Response to Original message
12. The boss?
Bruce Springsteen?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bdamomma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-09-06 01:11 PM
Response to Original message
13. Joe is selling his soul to the DEVILS
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
plasticsundance Donating Member (786 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-09-06 01:12 PM
Response to Original message
14. Three Stooges: Bush/Lieberman/Rove
What desperate idiots! Even Republicans are avoiding Bush's coat tails. The very thing that got Lieberman defeated yesterday (aligning with Bush) is the very thing that these idiots want to promote. What have they all been doing? Sucking cement through a straw.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Timbuk3 Donating Member (727 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-09-06 01:12 PM
Response to Original message
15. Freep this!
If The General Election Were To Be Held Today, For Whom Would You Vote?
Lamont (D) 29%
Lieberman (I) 55%
Schlesinger (R) 17%

http://www.wtic.com/index.php?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
insane_cratic_gal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-09-06 01:14 PM
Response to Reply #15
21. Don't you mean DU this?
Edited on Wed Aug-09-06 01:45 PM by insane_cratic_gal
Freep this? Do we use that term here to go after a poll that's already been freeped?

Because whatever poll we post here.. ultimately ends up on FR which ends up being freeped because it was seen here by a lurker.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Timbuk3 Donating Member (727 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-09-06 05:48 PM
Response to Reply #21
60. I stand corrected
Thank you.

LOL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-09-06 01:16 PM
Response to Reply #15
24. It's already been freeped.
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Critters2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-09-06 01:28 PM
Response to Reply #15
31. It's being freeped
But I Du'd it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreatCaesarsGhost Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-09-06 01:52 PM
Response to Reply #15
44. that adds up to 101%
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-09-06 01:13 PM
Response to Original message
18. 'nuff said
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Junkdrawer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-09-06 01:13 PM
Response to Original message
19. "The boss"? Wonder who that is - can't be Bush. Perhaps...
it's KKKarl's little way of referring to himself, as in "The boss is feeling a little randy tonight. Guess I'll give Jeff a call."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
smokey nj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-09-06 01:14 PM
Response to Original message
20. Doesn't Rove's offer to help just prove that Lieberman is the
defacto repuke nominee?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-09-06 02:36 PM
Response to Reply #20
55. Yes
because CT is a heavy democratic state along with independents.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
calico1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-09-06 01:14 PM
Response to Original message
22. Good. I hope it is widely reported. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-09-06 01:15 PM
Response to Original message
23. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
NewJeffCT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-09-06 01:16 PM
Response to Original message
26. Wonderful news - Bush has a 24% approval rating in CT
the last time it was reported.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Subdivisions Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-09-06 01:18 PM
Response to Original message
27. Sheer desperation
Edited on Wed Aug-09-06 01:18 PM by Texas Explorer
They can see the writing on the wall.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
YankeyMCC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-09-06 01:27 PM
Response to Original message
29. Just all part of the plan
to paint the image of a dangerous 'radical left' - "Poor Joe is a good man, we're not partisan and we want to help this POOR VICTIM of the radical left."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gregorian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-09-06 01:28 PM
Response to Original message
32. Pay no attention to that man behind the curtain.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
smoogatz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-09-06 01:30 PM
Response to Original message
33. This tells you how important Joementum is to Bush.
They need at least one prominent Democrat to endorse their agenda, otherwise they lose any claim to occupying some kind of mythical political "mainstream." Bushlicker Joe has been enabling W and his cadre of idiots since before day one--going back to his attempt to censure Clinton. I'd love it if Joe was dumb enough to accept money/help from Rove; it would be the end of his political career in CT.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Straight Shooter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-09-06 01:31 PM
Response to Original message
34. Good grief. Has a GOP henchman ever offered to help a *cough* Dem before?
Please tell me this is unprecedented.

Talk about selling your soul to the devil, and getting pennies in exchange.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oxbow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-09-06 01:38 PM
Response to Original message
37. Good. Now spread this far and wide
Edited on Wed Aug-09-06 01:39 PM by oxbow
I don't care how much money the White House and the RNC throw in Lieberman's warchest. In the end, Bush will still be the kiss of death to his campaign. That is, if Lamont refuses to let this stay "under the table."

You bet your life there's going to be a fight...it's just gotten started in CT.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-09-06 01:41 PM
Response to Original message
38. Why would Lieberman's staff disclose this?
I don't doubt that it happened, but I don't understand why they would be letting it out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Swamp Rat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-09-06 01:44 PM
Response to Reply #38
41. Someone can see THEM!
:hide:



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mr_Jefferson_24 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-09-06 01:45 PM
Response to Reply #38
42. Good question---makes no sense at all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-09-06 01:53 PM
Response to Reply #42
45. There are a lot of reasonable theories posted in this thread
that explain why dubya would be reaching out to Lieberman. But I still don't understand why Lieberman would be letting us know that Rove contacted him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Swamp Rat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-09-06 01:43 PM
Response to Original message
40. Told y'all!!
Edited on Wed Aug-09-06 01:43 PM by Swamp Rat
:D





:hi:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Symphony of Freedom Donating Member (29 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-09-06 01:45 PM
Response to Original message
43. Holy fuck...
Any "Democrat" who supported Loserman should be expelled from the party.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlCzervik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-09-06 01:57 PM
Response to Original message
47. i think if he took that help it would ensure his defeat, Rove publicly
offering his help imo is a kiss of death.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Az_lefty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-09-06 02:11 PM
Response to Original message
49. self delete
Edited on Wed Aug-09-06 02:12 PM by Az_lefty
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rosco T. Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-09-06 02:13 PM
Response to Original message
51. Tell me again why Joe is still a Dem and should keep his committee seats?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Liberal_Dog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-09-06 02:31 PM
Response to Original message
52. Rove's Words...
have been coming out of Liebermann's mouth for the past several days.

Would it really be a surprise if this "Independent" crap was Rove's idea all along?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ReadTomPaine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-09-06 02:33 PM
Response to Original message
53. This makes sense, since Joe is running against a Democrat. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Generator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-09-06 02:34 PM
Response to Original message
54. Oh my God
Ya know, I just read somebody from the DLC said we were "demonizing" Lieberman. No, it's holding him accountable. Just like we "hate Bush". No, we despise what he's doing to the country. It's not a cult of personality. It's what they do that hangs them. I'm never forgiving Lieberman if he doesn't get the fuck out of this race.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WiseButAngrySara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-09-06 02:57 PM
Response to Original message
57. Snow(job) was asked today if B* would be supporting Lieberman, and he
adamantly denied it. Which makes me believe it!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GeorgeGist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-09-06 03:04 PM
Response to Original message
58. True Love

Never been no fragile flower
I always got too much to say
Never had much luck with love and romance
I guess it's always been that way
But I've been seriously thinking
About slippin' on the velvet gloves
I know it's strange but my lucks about to change
Cause what we got here is True love, yeh, yeh

-Pat Benatar
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nikki Stone 1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-09-06 06:12 PM
Response to Original message
61. If Joe wonders why CT voters threw him out, this is why
WHat other Dem would Rove offer to help!

Makes me really believe that Lamont was the right choice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dweller Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-09-06 08:14 PM
Response to Original message
62. ...



dp
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Iniquitous Bunny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-09-06 08:39 PM
Response to Original message
63. Go ahead and make a deal with the devil, Joe.
I'm sure you'll get plenty of Republican support. :banghead:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 07:59 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC