Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Ignoring Ms Coulter, and her enablers, isn't making her go away

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
dsc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-29-06 04:00 PM
Original message
Ignoring Ms Coulter, and her enablers, isn't making her go away
While promoting her current book, Ms. Coulter has been on nearly every show she was on the last time she promoted a book. She has been on the Today Show, the Tonight Show, Hardball, and several others. For a full list (dates appear to be date of taping not date of airing) go here http://www.imdb.com/name/nm1326010/ . It is hard, looking at that list, to make a case that her 15 minutes is nearly over.

I am not old enough to remember, but in my lifetime, racial slurs were common place in everyday conversation and on TV. Southern newspapers refused to print a black person's last name. Thus Martin Luther King was refered to as Martin Luther or Martin. That isn't the case now. No one who used racial slurs or disrepected people racially would set foot in the Today Show's studios. Not unless they were already famous and making an abject apology. The likes of Ms. Coulter though are more than welcome.

People like me will never be fully equal to people like you if people are permitted to use those slurs on TV without reprecussion. We are dreaming if we believe any differently. No one will give a fag rights because fags aren't human. It doesn't get simpler than that.

I heard my quota, and a few other's quotas, of fag for lifetime. I'll be damned if in the guise of ignoring Ms. Coulter, I will tolerate the airing of that word for conservatives amusement. Ms. Coulter will go away if and only if we make Ms. Coulter go away. Ms. Coulter has every right to spout innane fantasies. She doesn't have every right to spout them on some of the most valuable TV real estate we have. I had an uncle who used to spout racial epithets from time to time. No one in my family suggested he should be permitted to go on the Today Show. We had the good sense to hang our heads and say "it's just uncle B. he is old you know". He wasn't going to change, but that didn't mean we had to listen to his deranged crap. In a sane world Ms. Coulter would be on a rocker somewhere talking to pidgeons, not in Matt Lauer's studio. Only by constant pressure do we have a prayer of making that happen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
bronxiteforever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-29-06 04:21 PM
Response to Original message
1. I still can't get over her remark about the 911 widows.
Edited on Sat Jul-29-06 04:29 PM by bronxiteforever
In a country that had a shred of human compassion for those who did suffer on that day, she would be banished to the trash heap and not given star treatment on talk shows. Her words show she is a monster. The fact that the media has not banned her for those odious statement confirms that the Matt Lauers and Chris Matthews of the world are not worthy of the men who died so that there would be freedom of the press.
Coulter couldn't just disagree with the politics of the 911 widows she had to assassinate their characters and say that they wanted their husbands dead. This harpy is allowed to portray those awful deaths in that way? would a democrat ever get away with this and be the celeb of the talk shows?

Matthews and Lauer would praise Hitler for being a good guest-in the end though she represents the GOP and majority power brokers and they have sick, sick minds and are soulless beings.

Thanks for getting my blood boiling again-good post
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gatorboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-29-06 04:25 PM
Response to Original message
2. I can't decide what's worse.
Her own behavior or that of her followers that are so forceful to defend her (especially the group standing behind her during her recent Hardball visit. That they're waving American flags knowing what she believes in, only make them even that more creepy).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
idgiehkt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-29-06 04:31 PM
Response to Original message
3. She's doing it because we did it first.
I said a while back that Letterman should have never referred to her as 'an inconvenient bitch'. Or who was it said that they had a voodoo doll of her and that they 'violated her' figuratively???Matthew McConaughy? Sean Penn?

We don't have a leg to stand on. Letterman's again calling her a 'crazy bitch' on tv. When will liberals get this through our thick heads...slurs against women are okay but slurs against gays are not? Wow, she'll have a field day with that one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-29-06 04:35 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. bitch = fag to you?
Edited on Sat Jul-29-06 04:35 PM by Bluebear
the slurs are equal? And she is the way she is because of how *we* act? Really?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
idgiehkt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-29-06 04:41 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. nope, not to me
but a hell of alot of middle america isn't going to be convinced there is much difference between Dave calling her a 'crazy bitch' and her calling Al Gore a 'fag'.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mrreowwr_kittty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-29-06 11:48 PM
Response to Reply #4
32. Umm, actually, it does to me
Degrading and dehumanizing. D'you think young men refer to women as 'bitches' as a sign of respect?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-30-06 12:21 AM
Response to Reply #32
38. So you have NEVER felt bitchy???
I sure have. I have told my SO that he is in a bitchy mood.

I never have called anyone a faggot. I'm surprised that you think both words are equally degrading, I don't think most people would.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mrreowwr_kittty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-30-06 12:42 AM
Response to Reply #38
42. Yes I have, and I've been called bitchy
I've also called things and people "gay" and "faggy". Depending on the context in which it is used, YES, bitch is as degrading as fag. Also, depending on the context in which fag is used.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-30-06 01:08 AM
Response to Reply #42
46. Well, I cannot imagine any good context for the word "fag"
But that's just me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mrreowwr_kittty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-30-06 01:21 AM
Response to Reply #42
49. As opposed to the 'good' bitch context? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dsc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-29-06 04:36 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. We should have never responded in kind
but the notion that we started this is totally absurd.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
idgiehkt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-29-06 04:40 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. nope, I'm not saying we 'started' it
I'm saying she's shrewd enough to observe something like that and go, wow, they just gave me a free ticket to slur them any way that I want; if they say anything about it I can call them hypocritical and they won't have a defense against it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dsc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-29-06 04:49 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. She is doing it because we did it first
what do those words mean other than we started it? I will agree, and have argued strenuously here, that we lost moral high ground by behaving in kind but that is different than what you originally said.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
idgiehkt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-29-06 05:40 PM
Response to Reply #8
14. because you are failing to put yourself in her head
and failing to give her credit for how shrewd she is because liberals still want to cling to the erroneous belief that the opposition is stupid. Ann Coulter is not stupid, she knows liberal commentary on her has given her a free pass, that's probably a large part of why she is doing all this, so when liberals go hysterical about it she can bring up what we've said about her, and ask why it is okay for us to call her, for instance, transgender, which is if you didn't know, the most common liberal slur against her, and yet it is not okay for her to call Al Gore a fag.

WAKE UP, people. She's probably setting it up just his way, because we were the stupid asses who rendered ourselves defenseless against this shit by our own hypocrisy. We are going to come off like hypocrites, and she is going to have the time of her life pointing it out. Gawd, I'd hate to enter "Ann The Man" Coulter in the search function here and see what comes up...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Quantess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-30-06 12:21 AM
Response to Reply #14
39. So..........help me out, here.
Are you arguing that Ann Coulter changed her gender to invite liberal criticism? Or that she tries to look transgendered? I'd say that's quite a feat, don't you? And all just to stir liberal hypocrisy.

That's what your post seems to say.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-29-06 05:02 PM
Response to Reply #3
11. Oh bull goddamn shit
There is a world of difference between bitch and fag and nigger. Bitch is just a word, like asshole or jerk. Men get bitchy too. It means something very specific and it is NOT a slur against women. It is also NOT a slur against women to call them a whore if they're acting like a whore, any more than it's a slur against men to call them a pimp if they're acting like a pimp. Females are not made up of a group of Holy Virgin Marys who are never deserving of any negative utterance regarding their bad behavior. Fag and nigger are used to specifically slur people because of WHO they are, not WHAT they do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
idgiehkt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-29-06 05:34 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. in your world.
"It is also NOT a slur against women to call them a whore if they're acting like a whore."

Who was it that made that comment a while back about 'white niggers'? Was it Byrd. Yeah, that went over like a lead balloon. Middle America isn't going to listen to your paragraph explanation about why what we do is okay vs. why what they do isn't. You've only got a few seconds to get your sound-bite in, and after the first half of the second sentence you've lost them. And that I quoted above about labeling women whores, well, I'd love to hear you expound on that. Are these the same women that 'asked for it' in cases of rape because of the way they were dressed?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-29-06 07:38 PM
Response to Reply #13
17. I am middle america
And I'm talking about the broad use of the word fag to disparage a whole group of people verses the very specific use of the word bitch to describe Ann Coulter's repulsive behavior. Not rape, not groups of poor whites, not anything else. Middle America is a helluva lot smarter than you think, except the ones who use words like nigger and fag themselves and who gives a shit what they think anyway.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
idgiehkt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-29-06 07:50 PM
Response to Reply #17
19. I know what you're talking about
but to alot of people the two are exactly the same thing and anyone trying to say differently is just going to look stupid.

I am also middle america, or working class southern, and I know that for many profanity is profanity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VelmaD Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-29-06 07:55 PM
Response to Reply #17
21. Get in it your head...
they use the word bitch to disparage women as a group.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VelmaD Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-29-06 07:54 PM
Response to Reply #11
20. I call bullshit
Edited on Sat Jul-29-06 08:01 PM by VelmaD
Bitch is a slur used against a person, almost always a woman, because of WHO they are. If it's used against a woman it's for not being a demure little flower like women are supposed to be. It it's used against a man it's to put him in the role of woman to belittle him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-29-06 10:03 PM
Response to Reply #20
26. I just disagree
It describes a behavior, not the whole of women the way nigger or fag does. The only time I've ever heard bitches used in a generically negative way against women as a group is in rap music, and that isn't mainstream and certainly isn't the way Letterman was using it with Ann Coulter. Women do act like bitches, as do men; women do act like whores, as do men. I think objecting to the use of bitch implies women couldn't possibly engage in such behavior and actually implies that they're "demure little flowers" because there's apparently no such thing as a bitch.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dsc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-29-06 10:32 PM
Response to Reply #26
27. The point is that we call a woman a bitch
but a man assertive for not being a demure little flower. I will grant it isn't totally equal but it isn't that far off.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-29-06 10:39 PM
Response to Reply #27
28. I honestly disagree
Would you call me assertive or bitchy? It's okay to be honest. Like I always say, call me anything but cupcake.

Women are put into all sorts of categories, from bitchy to cupcake to blonde. The particular words fag and nigger are all encompassing where we would have a bitchy nigger or a bitchy fag. I can't think of a word that equates to fag and nigger because women don't fall in quite the same category and never have. Women being stoned to death in foreign countries have got nothing in common with the word bitch. Nigger and fag are universal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dsc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-29-06 10:53 PM
Response to Reply #28
29. again I am not claiming a total correspondence
Clearly bitch is less universal than either of the others. I would call you assertive, but I try not to be sexist. Admittedly back in the primary wars I might have been a little less pc (lol). In all seriousness I can see why women find that word offensive.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-29-06 10:59 PM
Response to Reply #29
30. Exactly, not a total correspondence
I know that the subjugation and denigration of women is serious around the world and something that women should be a lot more aware of in this country. I just don't think bitch is the word that encompasses it all, although some in the younger crowd seem to use it in a more denigrating way and is incredibly offensive. But still doesn't rise to the level of those other two words.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mrreowwr_kittty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-29-06 11:52 PM
Response to Reply #28
34. Now surely
You've heard people make distinctions between "good" Black people and "n*****s", haven't you? Because I sure have. Whether or not a degrading term is all-encompassing has nothing to do with it's power to hurt the recipient.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-30-06 12:16 AM
Response to Reply #34
37. And there you have it
To those people you are referring, the universe of black people are "n" words except for the few who aren't. The universe of women are women, except for when we, on occasion, act like bitches. You identified the difference between a word used as a denigrating oppressive slur; and situational catty, snippity, backbiting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mrreowwr_kittty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-30-06 12:48 AM
Response to Reply #37
43. You are lucky indeed
Edited on Sun Jul-30-06 12:50 AM by thecatburgler
To live in a rare misogyny-free environment. To be relatively free from encounters with people who view the universe of women as bitches, except for the few exceptions. Or those who will be fairly neutral to you until you, as Rebecca West quipped, differentiate yourself from a doormat. At which point you become a bitch. (She was referring to the term 'feminist' but I think it's still an apt expression.) You are truly fortunate. Either that, or you haven't been paying attention.

edit to add: My experience comes from many years in male-dominated work environments. The guys tend to forget you're there and really let their attitudes toward women have free reign. You would be astonished at how some of them talk about us. "Bitch" is the least of it, really.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-30-06 01:17 AM
Response to Reply #43
47. Most men are not misogynists
It is not rare to live in a misogyny-free zone. I'm 48 years old. I've worked with men at many points in my life. I never took shit from any of them, I know exactly how they talk about women which isn't any different than how women talk about men. There are some real neanderthals out there that are physically threatening to women and fit the definition of misogynist, but most male bitch sessions are exactly that, bitch sessions and if women were honest about it they'd recognize them as such.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mrreowwr_kittty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-30-06 01:23 AM
Response to Reply #47
50. aargh! self-deleted as not even worth the trouble.....
Edited on Sun Jul-30-06 01:24 AM by thecatburgler
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dsc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-29-06 08:01 PM
Response to Reply #11
22. They are closer than you are giving them credit for being
Men who are called bitches are basicly being called gay (ie women like or prison bitches) and women who are called that are generally called that for behaviors which are at least tolerated in men and often celebrated.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VelmaD Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-29-06 08:02 PM
Response to Reply #22
23. thank you
for getting it :hug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dsc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-29-06 08:17 PM
Response to Reply #23
24. no problem
I have heard the word enough to understand what it means. We have to hang together or we hang seperately.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mrreowwr_kittty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-29-06 11:54 PM
Response to Reply #23
35. I do too! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-29-06 09:51 PM
Response to Reply #22
25. I said bitchY - not bitches
It describes behavior when it is used in that way, the way Letterman used it with Ann Coulter. "Bitches" as a broad term used derogatorily towards gays is relatively recent and has nothing to do with the traditional use of the word bitch regarding a bitchy woman.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FairVotes4all Donating Member (139 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-30-06 12:49 AM
Response to Reply #22
44. I always thought Bitches were Female Dogs...
...And considering Coulter is anything but human, I think it's a pretty close description.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CatWoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-29-06 11:16 PM
Response to Reply #11
31. oooooooooooooo
preach it, S&S

:D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
galileo3000 Donating Member (193 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-29-06 04:54 PM
Response to Original message
9. Patience, Coulter likes to bait extremism
Anne Coulter is very adept at garnering tremendous by provoking progressives through her intentionally caustic remarks. Don't take the bait - Elevate (please forgive me Johnny Cochran). Treat her as you would a frightened wounded animal, keep your distance. She is damaged goods and we are an easy target.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Backlash Cometh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-29-06 04:55 PM
Response to Original message
10. Making her a target of ridicule is becoming great sport.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Truthiness Inspector Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-29-06 05:12 PM
Response to Original message
12. She is a loon
who is imploding on her own. Yeah, she's selling a few books and getting "face time" on tv but her caustic schtick is starting to erode on her support. I was surfing the net a while back (sorry can't remember the site) where right wingers, mostly women, were pissed as hell she made those nasty comments about women being too stupid to handle money, etc. Little by little, she is tearing herself apart, and her supporters are thinning out. One day she will eventually insult everyone, and poof, there will be Annie all alone wondering where all the bright lights went.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
idgiehkt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-29-06 05:46 PM
Response to Reply #12
15. this is mean
but I am starting to beleive that except most of the time I just tell myself it's wishful thinking. I think that first she was a novelty, in a circus freak kind of way, then the 9/11 jingoism was her peak, and now neo-conservatism is on the decline because it's wrecked the world but maybe no one told her...so she's getting some flack she's not used to this time around. must suck. but she does seem a little edgy lately, like you said.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KC21304 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-29-06 06:05 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. She admitted on Hardball that her columns
have been discontinued in some cities so she is paying a price. And she has become even more freakish and shrill in defending herself. She may be getting exposure because of her freakish side show aspects but that is not what she wants. She considers herself a very smart Constitutional lawyer and now she knows she will never be recognized for that aspect of her career.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Doctor_J Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-29-06 07:45 PM
Response to Original message
18. Neither will posting every new idiocy she spews
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occulus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-29-06 11:51 PM
Response to Original message
33. Oh, I learned this lesson, all too well
That phrase ("ignore them and they'll go away") was my mom'sq favorite piece pf 'advice', followed closely by "if you insist on being different than others you should expect it" and with "I don't know what to tell you" a very close third.

It's bullshit. Complete, utter bullshit. Ann wants war with liberals; let's give her war- until she chokes to death on it.

STOP BEING NICE. STOP SHOWING "RESPECT". THEY DON'T APPRECIATE IT. THEY SEE IT AS A WEAKNESS. THEY TREAT US LIKE IT IS ONE.

Can I possibly be more plain than that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
area51 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-30-06 02:44 AM
Response to Reply #33
51. agreed.
Republinazi psychos want war; they should be given war.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bridgit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-29-06 11:57 PM
Response to Original message
36. so long as she is enabled to be outrageous without any form of...
cogent comeback she ain't going anywhere cause there's too much money i being what she is a screeching bitch willing to eat her debate coach tartar on a cold platter
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Disturbed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-30-06 12:41 AM
Response to Reply #36
41. What's the word for a man that says things
similar to Coulter? I agree that calling her a bitch is counter productive and sexist. I call her a viscious plagerist. Her looks are not imporant to me. Whether she is Trans or not does not matter. We should not ignore her and those that support &/or promote her on their shows. We should figure out how to fight her and all of those that agree with her awful views.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Quantess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-30-06 12:55 AM
Response to Reply #41
45. Isn't it funny. I think "bitch" is deserved, for her.
And I'm a woman. Why mince words? She's a psychotic bitch. Don't feel guilty saying it.

But, I must add, I liked it better when DU ignored her. I don't give a shit about her. Mostly, I came to this thread to say so, but I got caught up replying to some posts.

I like being blissfully unaware of her, and her unimportant antics.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-30-06 01:20 AM
Response to Reply #41
48. lol, "man"
cuz, you know, they're ALL lying vicious pricks.

Now see, that's sexist.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheFarseer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-30-06 12:25 AM
Response to Original message
40. uh........................
Who's ignoring her? She's been on every talk show but Oprah. I'm not saying ignoring her is the answer, but to say that ignoring her isn't working, is like saying crashing that space shuttle full of cotton candy into the sun hasn't stopped global warming. It hasn't happened yet so how can you say that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 11:26 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC