Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

So what is Bush's strategy for Afghanistan and Iraq?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-14-06 08:52 PM
Original message
So what is Bush's strategy for Afghanistan and Iraq?
Edited on Fri Jul-14-06 08:54 PM by ProSense

US sees three more years in building Afghan army

By Will Dunham | July 13, 2006

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - It will take three more years for the U.S.-trained Afghan army, intended to assume security responsibilities now shouldered by foreign forces in Afghanistan, to reach the planned goal of 70,000 soldiers, a U.S. commander said on Thursday.

Army Maj. Gen. Robert Durbin, who heads the U.S. effort to train and equip Afghan government security forces, said the national army numbers "a little bit over 30,000," and that it is growing at a rate of 1,000 per month, with a plan to reach 70,000 in roughly three years.

As in Iraq, U.S. officials have emphasized the importance of forming capable government security forces to take up the task of bringing law and order to a war-ravaged country. U.S. commanders in Iraq have pledged to have a 137,500-strong Iraqi army fully manned by the end of this year.

It has been almost five years since U.S.-led forces toppled Afghanistan's Taliban leaders, blamed for harboring the al Qaeda network responsible for the 2001 attacks on America, and U.S. forces have been helping build a new national army from scratch in a country battered by decades of strife.


http://www.boston.com/news/nation/washington/articles/2006/07/13/us_sees_three_more_years_in_building_afghan_army



Bombs, Mortars Strike Mosques in Baghdad

Bombs, Mortars Strike Baghdad Mosques; Sectarian Attacks Have Killed More Than 250 People
By KIM GAMEL
The Associated Press

BAGHDAD, Iraq - Bombs and mortars struck Shiite and Sunni mosques in the Baghdad area Friday, the latest in a week of tit-for-tat sectarian attacks that have killed more than 250 people.

The deadliest explosion came as worshippers left services at a Sunni mosque in northern Baghdad, killing 14 people and wounding five, police said.

Snip...


In March, President Bush praised American efforts to stabilize Tal Afar, saying he had "confidence in our strategy" and that success in the city "gives reason for hope for a free Iraq."

Also Friday, Iraq's national wrestling team pulled out of a tournament in the United Arab Emirates after its coach was killed in an attack in Baghdad, sports reporter Sagban al-Rubaie said, acting as a spokesman for the team.

http://abcnews.go.com/International/wireStory?id=2193193&page=1




Insurgents have killed two more of our troops in Iraq. A sailor and a naval construction regiment was killed in Al Anbar province, and a soldier was killed in the northern city of Mosul.

2,545 of our troops have now been killed in Iraq, 18,874 troops have been wounded, 8,628 seriously wounded.

Democratic senators today blasted the Bush administration's conduct of the war in Iraq. Democratic members of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee said Iraq is facing a full-scale civil war. The senators' comments come one day after the U.S. commanding general in Iraq said our troops could be called back to patrol the streets of Baghdad.

Jamie McIntyre reports from the Pentagon.

(BEGIN VIDEOTAPE)

JAMIE MCINTYRE, CNN SR. PENTAGON CORRESPONDENT (voice-over): In a week in which more than 180 Iraqis have died in sectarian attacks, at least 100 killed in Baghdad alone, the U.S. ambassador to Iraq was on Capitol Hill arguing that the rising violence between Sunni and Shia factions is not the start of a civil war.

SEN. JOHN KERRY (D), MASSACHUSETTS: Is it a low-grade civil war?

ZALMAY KHALIZAD, U.S. AMBASSADOR TO IRAQ: I have to think that whether it's going to become a civil war, whatever the term of "full blown" or not, will be something that we judge later on with regard to what happened. Subsequently, we -- it would be, I think, a mistake to judge it, that this is the beginning of an overall civil war.

KERRY: Let's not quibble over the descriptive term. Let's agree that violence is up, it's increased sectarian violence.

KHALILZAD: It is.

KERRY: The heart of the question is if, you would agree it can't be resolved militarily?

KHALILZAD: I agree, I say the following, Senator Kerry, which is that in order to deal with this problem, you need both political steps and security steps.

MCINTYRE: In a speech this week in Washington, Ambassador Khalilzad said the violence between Shia and Sunni Iraqis has now surpassed the insurgency as the biggest threat to Iraq's future. Now he's telling congress, time is running out.

KHALILZAD: I believe that this government has about six months or so to bring the sectarian violence under control. And if it doesn't, then I think we would have a serious situation.

MCINTYRE: Violence is rising despite the dispatch of 50,000 Iraqi troops in Baghdad, forcing U.S. Commander General George Casey to consider bringing more American troops back into the capital city. Critics, including some senators just back from Iraq, say the current strategy is simply not working.

SEN. JOSEPH BIDEN (D-DE), FOREIGN AFFAIRS CMTE: I still don't see a strategy for, a clear strategy for victory in Iraq. I do see a strategy for preventing things from outright defeat. But I don't, I haven't come away with a clear strategy for victory.

(END VIDEOTAPE)

MCINTYRE: Meanwhile, the much anticipated announcement on U.S. troop cuts is still on hold, something Ambassador Khalilzad today described as simply an intent, a goal. And he insisted that General George Casey has not drawn up a firm timetable for the withdrawal of U.S. troops because of the uncertainty of the months ahead. Lou?

http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0607/13/ldt.01.html


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
C_U_L8R Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-14-06 08:55 PM
Response to Original message
1. his strategy is leave it for someone else to clean up
same strategy he's had his whole life..

from a servant filled childhood to boarding
school dorm to countless failed businesses
and the worst presidency ever... the man is a mess

and he leaves a mess behind.. every time
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joemurphy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-14-06 08:58 PM
Response to Original message
2. He has no strategy other than "stay the course".
He's a stubborn, ignorant, and disconnected man with no understanding of the issues, no intellectual curiosity, and, at bottom, no inclination to admit he might have made a mistake. He's a disastrous President.

Let's hope the country learns from his mistakes and learns something about how to elect a decent President.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robinlynne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-14-06 08:59 PM
Response to Original message
3. his strategy? make money. more money. more money.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-14-06 09:38 PM
Response to Original message
4. Top uniformed Army officer says nation is not losing the war

Top uniformed Army officer says nation is not losing the war

By Anne Plummer Flaherty
ASSOCIATED PRESS

12:09 p.m. July 14, 2006

WASHINGTON – The Army's top uniformed officer said Friday he did not believe the United States was losing the war in Iraq, but declined to say the nation was winning.

Americans should brace for a long, dangerous fight against terrorism, said Gen. Peter Schoomaker, the Army's chief of staff.

“I believe that we are closer to the beginning ... than we are to the end,” he said during a luncheon on Capitol Hill sponsored by the Defense Forum Foundation.

When asked whether the military was winning in Iraq, Schoomaker paused before telling the audience of mostly congressional staffers: “I don't think we're losing.”

Schoomaker cited sectarian violence as a serious problem and said achieving security was becoming more “complex.”

more...

http://www.signonsandiego.com/news/nation/20060714-1209-us-iraq.html


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 16th 2024, 08:06 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC