Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

I was thinking tonight. Bush must be pretty bad if he

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
Crazy Guggenheim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-11-06 12:23 AM
Original message
I was thinking tonight. Bush must be pretty bad if he
seems better .......



At least he wanted National Healthcare and got the door opened to China ..... That's very :scared: :scared: :scared:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
WCGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-11-06 12:24 AM
Response to Original message
1. I lived through both......
Bush, Jr. Makes 'em all seem great....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Crazy Guggenheim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-11-06 12:26 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Same here. I was berely a teen when Tricky Dick first got elected.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WCGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-11-06 12:27 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. I was 11....
And I knew it was wrong, even at that tender age...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Major Hogwash Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-11-06 01:05 AM
Response to Reply #1
11. No Shit! Bush even makes Hoover look like the Jobs President!
And Coolidge look like the All-Involved-In-The-Details President!

You know what this proves don't cha?

That the "anybody can host Saturday Night Live" concept has been taken to the highest Federal level in our government!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TygrBright Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-11-06 12:26 AM
Response to Original message
3. Yeh. I NEVER thought I'd feel nostalgic for ol' Tricky Dick...
...but the Negative Income Tax, the CETA program, etc., are all looking positively Gandhi-esque compared to *&Co's systematic smash-and-grab raid on Everyone Else.

After all, it was only booze and paranoia that made Nixon the shithead he was. He wasn't STUPID, too.

reminiscently,
Bright
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-11-06 12:28 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. Help me, we miss NIXON. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Crazy Guggenheim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-11-06 12:32 AM
Response to Reply #3
6. He put in the EPA too. However, Vietnam! 30,000+ Americans died
when he was in offics.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Syrinx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-11-06 12:33 AM
Response to Original message
7. I posted pretty much the same thing a few weeks ago
Believe it or not, Nixon actually considered the idea of Guaranteed Minimum Income!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mayberry Machiavelli Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-11-06 12:41 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. Nixon's ideas may have been wrong, and his megalomania made him do
unethical things to hold on power, but, unlike shrub, I think he fundamentally cared about governing and took it seriously.

That's why Nixon had serious meetings and discussions about issues with his cabinet, and shrub does not.

Paul O'Neill who served in both admins, writes eloquently of this in his "Price of Loyalty" book.

Shrub clearly doesn't give a shit about actually governing, the quickest glance over his performance during Katrina, and his shitty, substanceless cliche ridden "speeches", along with initiatives that are just mentioned for window dressing (mission to Mars, Rove in charge of rebuilding NOLA) and then forgotten immediately when realized to be unfeasible, tells you all you need to know.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-11-06 12:57 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. He was a statesman. We don't seem to have those any more. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Crazy Guggenheim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-11-06 01:02 AM
Response to Original message
10. Has anybody read that book "Eyewitness to Power" by Dave Gergen?
I'd say about 1/3 of his book is about Nixon. Read the book.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Major Hogwash Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-11-06 01:08 AM
Response to Reply #10
12. Gergen was one of Nixon's speechwriters, wasn't he?
So, did Gergen think Nixon resigning was a great idea or just a good idea?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Crazy Guggenheim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-11-06 01:12 AM
Response to Reply #12
13. He was a speechwriter. He thought it was great. BTW, Gergen does not like
Edited on Tue Jul-11-06 01:13 AM by Crazy Guggenheim
John Dean; he views him as a "rat". It's interesting since Gergen voted for Humphrey in 68.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Major Hogwash Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-11-06 01:16 AM
Response to Reply #13
14. Gergen is just a Nixon apologist as far as I am concerned.
His bias is really obvious when he starts talking about Dean.

Humphrey, on the other hand, was just a rubber stamp for Johnson's policies.
He would have continued the Vietnam war just like Nixon did.

Gergen was for the Vietnam War back then.
But, he doesn't mention that aspect of his character that much anymore.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Crazy Guggenheim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-11-06 01:25 AM
Response to Reply #14
15. In his book he did say he supported it. He's gotten more liberal though.
Edited on Tue Jul-11-06 01:27 AM by Crazy Guggenheim
He was Communications Director under Clinton. He's ProChoice and 'large social safety net man'. He said he didn't get along that well with the conservatives in Reagan years. He says that he more in-line with the DLC. He also had an offer from the current Bush Admin but he turned it down since they "are too secretive." Overall he is more of a moderate Republican type.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Major Hogwash Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-11-06 01:49 AM
Response to Reply #15
19. Yeah, and look how well that worked out for Clinton!
Edited on Tue Jul-11-06 01:49 AM by Major Hogwash
With Gergen as his Communications Director!

He's like Chris Matthews - it's all about Chris.
I actually heard Chris say the other day on the Colbert Report that he was always against the Iraq war.

I thought, gees, Chris, did you forget about that book you were hawking back in January of 2003?
I didn't.

Gergen is more of a moderate than most Republicans, but he is still a Republican.
Also, when he worked with Reagan, he tore up Mondale in 1984, even after the debacle in Lebanon.

He's not as wacko as Pat Buchanan, who believes that Gitmo is a good idea.
Yet, he isn't able to explain the Iraq War in a logical, cohesive manner and that to me says volumes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Crazy Guggenheim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-11-06 01:31 AM
Response to Original message
16. Wasn't it John Dean that wrote "WorseThan Watergate"? What does that say?!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-11-06 01:41 AM
Response to Reply #16
17. The center of the book is about secrecy -- how preternaturally
secretive this regime is. And, how secrecy fosters criminal activity. That's my recollection, anyway.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Viva_La_Revolution Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-11-06 02:40 AM
Response to Reply #17
25. I'm just starting it, finally!
Edited on Tue Jul-11-06 02:41 AM by Viva_La_Revolution
thanks for the spoiler! :evilgrin:

:hug:

edit: punk.tu.ation
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-11-06 02:42 AM
Response to Reply #25
26. Sorry!
:blush:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-11-06 02:07 AM
Response to Reply #16
22. This might be a connection between the two books:
WTW was itself a warning about allowing the Executive to accrue power, to operate in secret. Dean argued that the Iraq "war" is illegal.

His book went largely ignored. I think that could have spurred him to study why that happened, why this very clear warning of his was being ignored. And this book could be his answer to that question.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Crazy Guggenheim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-11-06 02:13 AM
Response to Reply #22
23. Thanks. WTW is going to be my next read. Later is the "Conservative" one.
Edited on Tue Jul-11-06 02:14 AM by Crazy Guggenheim
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-11-06 02:21 AM
Response to Reply #23
24. I just finished reading "Overthrow" and "Dark Ages America".
Both were excellent and instead of moving on, I think I need to read them both again. Together, they really show the play between our foreign policy and who we become as a people. Both were great reads, with DAA being a little more dense.

Dean is a terrific writer. When the goosebumps go away, I need to read this last work.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SeattleGirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-11-06 01:47 AM
Response to Original message
18. Compared to Bush, Nixon was a choir boy.
Not saying Nixon was "good", but Bush and the Evil Cabal really put Nixon to shame.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-11-06 01:50 AM
Response to Reply #18
20. I think Rayguns was the pivot, the tipping point. Maybe
"it's morning again in America" is the first Orwellian catchphrase from the Thuggery.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Major Hogwash Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-11-06 01:55 AM
Response to Reply #18
21. That's because Cheney had just gotten introduced into Washington
by Rumsfeld at that time.

Did you see that documentary "Frontline: Dark Side"?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 11:14 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC