Candy and Wolfie say that our poll numbers are slipping :)

[goclark]

If you just listened to their lead in you would believe that the Democrats are worried because the RepubliCONS are getting it right and we are "slipping."

Did I hear that one right? :evilfrown:

[MissMarple]

1. They think George is getting a bump from all the good Iraq news.

It's all in the spin. Who do you think Candy really works for?

[joefree1]

2. Repuke's polls were so low

... only the serious kool-aid drinkers were supporting them.

Hey did you hear Rush got busted at the Airport?

There go those polls. :evilgrin:

[Vinca]

3. Someone remind them Clinton was at 60% during Monica-gate. nt

[itzamirakul]

6. Drop an email to them pointing out that fact. nt

[itzamirakul]

4. What else CAN they say?

They gotta try to reverse the trend Bush is on somehow and even a tiny bump from going to Iraq did nothing for him. So they do the dame thing the Bush cousin did at Fox News. They announce the lie and then they stick to it.

We ain't stoopid. We just don't have access to all the msm that they have...otherwise we would tell them the truth.

[depakid]

5. If you believe anything on CNN

then you pretty well deserve your worries.

[still_one]

8. we should be worried. This is the same crap that was said

for the last six years. If we don't get back one of the houses in 2006 you can kiss the republic goodbye

The turnout in the primarys were awful. We better have a large turnout, and bring labor back to the party

[depakid]

10. With the way the so called "leadership" has acted- and continues

to act- of course we should be worried.

But not because of anything on CNN.

or the the Washington Post....

[still_one]

16. We will succeed in spite of the democratic leadership

IF WE SHOW UP TO VOTE, AND ENSURE THAT THE VOTES ARE COUNTED

[depakid]

19. Agreed.

[goclark]

11. I wasn't worried until I read some of the posters on this thread

My original post had a :) because I always believe that Wolf and Candy LOVE the NeoCons.

How big was his bump? I thought it was about 2 pts. on Gallup.

[still_one]

17. Like someone had previously note, worried, NOT because of CNN

pseudo poll, but because we MUST get the vote out

[still_one]

7. I know that in California the govenors race is a dead heat

while before the primary we had the lead

Nothing should be assumed or taken for granted, and frankly it will be an uphill battle. There is very little action that the DNC is doing regarding the voting machines

Unless we have a turnout, and I mean a REAL turnout in 2006, we will have a difficult time getting control in any one of the houses

[jerry611]

9. GOP numbers are rebounding because we are so divided

Democrats can't come together on anything. So we arn't going to gain any votes. We claim we are against the war, yet only 12 Senate Democrats vote to withdrawl troops. During the whole immigration debate, Democrats either supported open borders or stood and did nothing.

The Democratic party right now is being run by a bunch of morons and sell-outs. So don't expect any major victories this November.

edit: typo

[MissMarple]

13. Democrats do come together on things Health care, education,

safe communities, viable employment, a wholesome environment, a sane and balanced foreign policy, and a well trained, supplied and supported military are just a few of them.

The MSM shills keep saying we don't, and then proceed to magnify our differences in a hypocritical attempt to illustrate their "point".

[leesa]

24. Umm..they're LYING. The poll numbers are terrible for the GOP

Why do you let them jerk you around like this? Monica and Wolf are paid shills for the GOP. They lie continuously.

[KurtNYC]

12. Are they referring to Lieberman's poll numbers perhaps?

;-)

[goclark]

18. Did they take a big bounce? I pray not!

[Arkansas Granny]

14. Maybe they are referring to this WaPo article:

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/06/26/AR2006062600250.html

Fourth paragraph states that Democrats have lost their advantage on certain issues concerning national security. Bush's numbers are still low enough to cause them concern, however.

[Joe Chi Minh]

15. LOL was my immediate reaction. Then after mature reflection,

LingOL continued louder than ever.

[lonestarnot]

20. That's the same shit the freak stand-in for Anderson Pooper

is trying to lay. What crap. I'd say the same if I owned a network and was one of those freaks. Confidence traded for lies.

[lpbk2713]

21. Candy & Wolfie ..... Now there's a match made in heaven.

Sort of like Frank Burns and Hotlips.

[never_get_over_it]

22. They're just getting the public prepared

so that when they steal the key races - nobody will question - or I guess few of us will question. Because election fraud, we're screwed....

[Donna Zen]

23. Yep

BTW, on this same page there is post advocating that no Dems go on faux. Whatever. But I consider CNN equally bad or worse than faux, because many moderates and Dems give them more credit. Well, CNN shills all the time. And yet, I know off-line Dems who believe that Wolfie is a liberal.

CNN is very dangerous.

[upi402]

25. Corporate News Network spewing BS???? No! It cannot be!

:sarcasm: