Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

PNAC Richard Perle has the best advice re: Iraq situation (PULL OUT)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
Roland99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-18-06 09:47 AM
Original message
PNAC Richard Perle has the best advice re: Iraq situation (PULL OUT)
Edited on Sun Jun-18-06 09:48 AM by Roland99
Those were, essentially, his very words to Vladimir Pozner re: Afghanistan:

Pozner: "We've asked the United States help us get out if you're really interested in stopping the bloodshed. Provided that indeed that no more aid is given to what people here call freedom fights and we call counter-revolutionaries. I believe that's possible provided the United States is interested in the same."

Perle: "They arrived in a matter of days on Christmas Eve in 1979 they can be home by Christmas Eve if they decide to leave Afghanistan, and let the Afghans decide their own future. If you leave, the problem of support to the Mujahedeen solves itself."


Gorbachev was shocked at the US response and warned the US, via the KGB, that democracy would not rise in Afghanistan, rather, extreme forms if Islamism would rise up.

Gorbachev's warning was ignored and, eventually, the Taliban came to power in Afghanistan and eventually came to harbor Al Qaeda after bin Laden left Sudan. The rest, as they say, is history.


Now, extrapolate Perle's advice to the Soviets to, essentially, "cut and run" to today's atmosphere in Iraq.

Iraq has a rather stable government and a modicum of democracy (sprinkled with a healthy dose of corruption) and much greater international awareness than Afghanistan in the late 1980s.

Wouldn't the PNAC's own advice to the Soviets now actually be best for America? Let Iraq fend for itself and stop the bloodshed by removing the source of the problem (an occupying foreign force).

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
msongs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-18-06 09:53 AM
Response to Original message
1. we won! lets send cheney to Iraq to accept the grateful thanks of
the iraqi people for trashing the wmds and nukes, getting rid of sadaam, and restoring the glory of the lost empire. then say goodbye and now its your turn..and leave!

end the occupation.

Msongs

can you sing?
www.msongs.com/vocalistwanted.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cocoa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-18-06 10:01 AM
Response to Original message
2. some Soviet equivalent of Perle probably made a prediction
about a grand plaza in Kabul named after Breznev. See my sig line.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Roland99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-18-06 10:05 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. No, I doubt it. At that point, the Soviets were looking for a way out.
Under Gorbachev, they'd realized they were not going to "win" in Afghanistan and were looking for the best way out in order to somewhat save face over the massive amount of lives lost and money spent.

They were seeking the US's help but since the PNAC neocons were in charge of US foreign policy and had helped create the exaggeration that the Soviets were a boogeyman bent on world domination, this was a perfect way to help them self-destruct to "prove" their point.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cocoa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-18-06 10:08 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. but there was a phase where they were promoting the war to their people
I'd love to see a comparison between Bush's propaganda offensive and Breznev's.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Roland99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-18-06 10:15 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. Probably quite similar. But, Brezhnev predates the timing of Perle's
statement.

Gorbachev was in power then and was reversing course re: Afghanistan.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 06:55 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC