Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The Republican War Party

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-15-06 11:07 AM
Original message
The Republican War Party
The debate in the Senate over a new Iraq resolution will cement the republican party's reputation and status as the nation's 'War Party', or more appropriately for the time, the 'Iraq War Party'.

Relegated to the dustbin of history in the debate will be the Bush regime's strident claims of hidden weapons of mass destruction in Iraq; all the warnings about uranium tubes, bio-chem weapons labs, bio-chem weapon attacks discredited and no longer effective tools to cow a fearful public as they managed in the wake of the collapse of the World Trade Center buildings.

Revived by the republican War Party, and ready for prime time will be the appeals to fear that worked so well in allowing them to mortgage ours, and our children's' future to the violent and costly aftereffects of their reckless militarism.

House Majority Leader John Boehner laid out the Iraq War Party's vision and agenda in a memo revealed to the country yesterday by ThinkProgress.org. In it Boehner reveals a republican party so bereft of ideas, and so enamored of war, that it is compelled to re-exploit the tragedy of 9-11 in an attempt to frighten Americans into believing that withdrawing our troops from Iraq would make the U.S. less secure. The three main goals of the republican War Party are (as ThinkProgress describes) to:

1. Exploit 9/11. The two page memo mentions 9/11 seven times. It describes debating Iraq in the context of 9/11 as “imperative.”

2. Attack opponents ad hominem. The memo describes those who opposes President Bush’s policies in Iraq as “sheepish,” “weak,” and “prone to waver endlessly.”

3. Create a false choice. The memo says the decision is between supporting President Bush’s policies and hoping terrorist threats will “fade away on their own.”

The republicans are finally coming to grips with their true selves. There will be no more pretending to care about the health care needs of the nation's citizens from the War Party; no more concern about exploding energy costs; no more wondering aloud from them about whether our children is learning.

The republican War Party is stepping out of their citizen's clothing and into their militarist garb; the war hawks, the war hounds, the warmongers, the tyrants.

More precisely, with $10b a month in tax dollars going to fund wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, hijacked from our Treasury by republicans with 'emergency' spending bills, the republican War Party has decided that supporting their junta in Iraq is more important than supporting the needs and concerns of the American people.

"I've directed our Secretary of Treasury and the Treasury Department to send teams of experts to Iraq to help the government create a public finance system." Bush said yesterday. "These advisers will help Iraqis develop an economic framework that promotes growth and job creation and opportunity. I've directed the Secretaries of Commerce and Agriculture to travel to Iraq as soon as possible to meet with their counterparts."

"To revitalize the Iraqi economy, the Prime Minister is working to increase oil and electricity production." Bush explained. "We spent a lot of time talking about energy in Iraq."

But, what about the needs and concerns of Americans? Where does Bush and the republican War Party get the money to rebuild Iraq's infrastructure as our own country's needs get short shrift from them at appropriations time.

" American people deserve to know how their tax dollars are spent," House Democratic leader Pelosi, "and if it's in furtherance of the goals as stated by the Bush Administration."

"This New Direction of fiscal soundness, pay-as-you-go, audit the books is the guiding principle." she continued. "Under that, we say that our troops must be provided a future worthy of their sacrifice. While they're fighting, what's happening here at home?"

"Health insurance costs have gone up 70 percent under the Bush Administration and the Republican Congress -- six million more Americans do not have coverage." Pelosi said. "The cost of gasoline has nearly doubled in the five years of the Bush Administration -- up to $3 a gallon. Tuition for higher education has increased enormously, yet the Bush Administration has taken us in the wrong direction, cutting $12 billion in assistance for higher education. And the purchasing power of middle-income families' wages has been greatly reduced under the Bush Administration and the Republican Congress."

Senate Democratic Leader Reid echoed the House Leader's concerns over the effect of the republican War Party's military priority and the effect on the nation's debt: "President Bush has presided over the largest explosion of debt in our nation’s history." he said. When President Bush took office, the total national debt was $5.6 trillion. The federal debt has increased 54 percent since President Bush took office, from approximately $5.6 trillion at the end of 2000 to an estimated $8.6 trillion at the end of 2006. By 2011, the President’s budget would increase the public debt to $11.8 trillion," Reid argued.

Democratic Party Chairman Dean weighed in with his own admonition of the republican War Party: "Instead of engaging in a real debate about the war in Iraq," he says. "Republicans would prefer to engage in partisan attacks for political gain. The troops deserve more than a partisan political production"

Yet, this debate today is more than just a production for the republican War Party. The debate over a new Iraq resolution is the debut of their new persona. The Iraq War Party intends to redefine the Iraq war as the center of the battle of the Bush regime's 'war on terror'. Iraq was first conceived as their breeding ground for an escalation of violent opposition to America and our interests as Bush invited attacks on our soldiers with his battle cry of 'bring them on', and announced his intention to have our troops "fight them there . . .".

The new Iraq resolution refuses a date certain for the withdrawal of our troops and leaves our nation "committed to the completion of the mission" in Iraq. But the 'mission' in Iraq is going to be defined today by the republican War Party as a front in the broader 'war on terror.' "Are we going to confront the threat of terrorism and defeat it, or will we relent and retreat in the hopes that it just goes away?" Boehner said in a statement.

Yet, Bush yesterday rejected the notion that terrorism could be eliminated in Iraq. The best Bush said we could hope for was an 'environment' in which the new Iraqi government could function. That's what Bush and the republican War Party intend to produce for the mortgaging of ours, and our children's' future sacrifices. The defense of the new Iraqi government.

The fate of our nation's soldiers has been left to the whim of the Iraqis. As Bush stated in his press conference yesterday, the generals in Iraq will make the recommendations, in consultation with the Iraqi government. Today Iraq's minister of national security said the issue of troop withdrawal will be up to the Iraqi parliament.

With no plan to withdraw from Iraq, and an intention to continue to further yoke the product of our nation's citizens work and sacrifice to their failed military adventure there, the republican Iraq War Party is establishing something quite extraordinary in the history of the two-party domination of our nation's political system. The Iraq War Party seeks to commit us to a perpetual defense of their coddled junta, firmly establishing America as a guarantor of the Maliki regime, effective with the perpetual authorization of our military occupation there.

That's what the new Iraq resolution is all about: License for perpetual war, and codifying of the New Imperialism that Bush has been allowed to further and deepen as a result of an ineffective opposition in Congress. The Democratic members of the House weren't allowed to offer any legislative alternative to the War Party's imprimatur of their open embrace of their warmonger persona. They don't need one.

In rejecting this sham document, and in continuing to press the republican majority to return to a focus on America and American needs and concerns, the Democratic Party will prevail as the only party remaining that intends to represent them. The republican Iraq War Party should not be allowed to pull the focus and resources away from our country for their war games. The War party should not be allowed to prevail.

http://www.opednews.com/articles/opedne_ron_full_060615_the_republican_war_p.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-15-06 11:42 AM
Response to Original message
1. don't leave this old patriot hanging . . .
:patriot:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bridgit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-15-06 11:47 AM
Response to Original message
2. dems should to the last vote simply 'present' and nothing more
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-15-06 12:16 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. I agree.
I can't imagine there's any chance of that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bridgit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-15-06 12:23 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. then, sadly, dems will have to continue eating their very own crow...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-15-06 01:08 PM
Response to Original message
5. .
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-15-06 02:30 PM
Response to Original message
6. We know they are trying to politicize the war in Iraq
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Democrats accused Republicans of playing election year politics with the
Iraq war on Thursday, as the U.S. House of Representatives debated a resolution that wrapped the unpopular conflict into the overall war on terrorism.

On the day that the U.S. military death toll in Iraq reached 2,500, House Republicans put forward a resolution proclaiming that the United States would win the war on terror and declaring that it was not in the nation's security interest to set an "arbitrary date" to withdraw U.S. forces from Iraq.

"It is not enough for this House to say we support our troops," said House Speaker
Dennis Hastert. "That statement rings hollow if we do not also say we support their mission."

House Democratic leader Nancy Pelosi said: "We know they are trying to politicize the war in Iraq. It's shameful, but they are."

http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20060615/pl_nm/iraq_congress_usa_dc;_ylt=A9G_RyD8r5FEUCEAfAxZ.3QA;_ylu=X3oDMTA5aHJvMDdwBHNlYwN5bmNhdA--
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-15-06 04:18 PM
Response to Original message
7. Some quotes from the congressional debate on Iraq (with video)
Edited on Thu Jun-15-06 04:34 PM by bigtree
Thu, Jun. 15, 2006
Knight Ridder Newspaper
http://www.fortwayne.com/mld/newssentinel/news/editorial/14827248.htm

WASHINGTON - Both houses of Congress debated the war in Iraq on Thursday, the first extended debate on it since autumn 2002 when Congress authorized President Bush to use force there. Below are some select quotations from the debate:

Rep. John Murtha, D-Pa.: "What is the definition of sectarian violence? A civil war. All of us want to end this thing; all of us want to find a way to prevail in Iraq. But this is a civil war, and we're caught in a civil war. There's less than 1,000 al-Qaida in Iraq. They've diminished al-Qaida. We're caught in a civil war between 100,000 Shias and 20,000 Sunnis fighting each other."

Rep. George Miller, D-Calif.: "This is a blunder of historic proportions by this president. And it's very important that we understand that we are paying a huge price for these mistakes by this administration."

Rep. Rahm Emanuel, D-Ill., speaking to the Republican Congress: "You have adopted an approach of hear no evil, see no evil, speak no evil, with abandon. ... The debate today is about whether the American people want to stay the course ... or pursue a real strategy for success in the war on terror."


VIDEO: Dems ripping GOP on House floor today over failed Iraq policy

Pelosi's YouTube page will be updated with Dem speeches throughout the day.

http://www.youtube.com/user/NancyPelosi

While Tony Snow reacts to the 2,500th combat death by saying "it's a number," House Democrats call for a moment of silence during the Iraq debate:

2,500 - A Moment of Silence

Some powerful speeches so far:

Rep. McGovern - "I'm not interested in therapy"
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M9k-vLrpB9o

Rep. Slaughter - The Republican Play Book on Iraq
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n4xq1iWDs3c

Rep. George Miller - Bring an End to the War
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fKr8MYzPqcY

Rep. Emanuel - GOP Iraq policy, "See no evil, hear no evil"
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8TgkU1YmFDs


BBC: The War Party:

Sunday, 18 May 2003

They brought us war against Iraq - what do the hawks in Washington have in store for us now?

http://news.bbc.co.uk/nol/shared/spl/hi/programmes/panorama/transcripts/thewarparty.txt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
savemefromdumbya Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-16-06 08:51 AM
Response to Original message
8. just change the last letter from q to n
Cheney takes his gun to Iran
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-16-06 05:24 PM
Response to Reply #8
12. can't do both at the same time
Iraqi militants vow war until 'doomsday' (replace 'Iraqi' with American)
http://www.smh.com.au/news/World/Iraqi-militants-vow-war-until-doomsday/2006/06/17/1149964772936.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thoughttheater Donating Member (71 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-16-06 09:48 AM
Response to Original message
9. The Democrat's Iraq Dilemma
Read an analysis that discusses the risks associated with the strategy and the message the Democrats offer on Iraq and how some within the Party may be taking different positions for future political gain...here:

www.thoughttheater.com
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-16-06 10:15 AM
Response to Reply #9
10. that's interesting
I think that this latest Iraq Resolution ploy, and the immigration ploy as well, are diversions from the republican's lack of a positive agenda beyond their tax schemes for the wealthy. They're also set to highlight their roles in, and support of, two of this administration's prominent failures (Iraq and border bungling) as a representation of what they want to continue with if reelected.

How's that for an agenda?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bridgit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-16-06 11:08 AM
Response to Original message
11. kick...
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 01:42 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC