Diebold Says --
"As the world's leading voting solutions provider, Diebold provides the financial stability, substantial manufacturing capacity, world-wide service network and proven election expertise needed for your long term election system solution." (
http://www.diebold.com/dieboldes/)
"
In 2002, Diebold deployed the country's first uniform statewide electronic touch-screen voting system. More the 22,000 voting stations were successfully installed in six months and effectively utilized in the Georgia 2002 gubernatorial election. Our project management expertise and expandable manufacturing capabilities made this historic event a reality. Surveyed voters in Georgia gave the system a 97 percent approval rating and voter confidence skyrocketed." (
http://www.diebold.com/dieboldes/solutions2.htm)
Wikipedia Says:
Accusations of fraud have been made in a Project Censored article, claiming that "On Nov. 3, 2002, the Atlanta Journal-Constitution poll showed Democratic Sen. Max Cleland with a 49-to-44 point lead over Republican Rep. Saxby Chambliss. The next day, Chambliss, despite trailing by 5 points, ended up winning by a margin of 53 to 46 percent. This was, in other words, an unbelievable 12-point turn around over the course of one day!" (
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Max_Cleland)
So, will someone please explain to me how a 12-point lead wasn't "enough" to keep Max Cleland in the Senate? Oh, wait! The Republicans ran an ad showing the DECORATED VIETNAM VET who had lost BOTH LEGS and part of ONE ARM as someone who "loved" Osama and Saddam, and OBVIOUSLY, it being Georgia, the voters BELIEVED THE TELEVISION BECAUSE GEORGIA PEOPLE ARE STUPID???
Let me explain this one more time for the folks who just don't want to get it:
Its not the message the Democrats are putting out that is the problem.
Its not the lack of "registered" Democrats (New Mexico had counties with 80% registered Dems, and NOT ONE VOTE FOR KERRY!)
Its not the people the party is putting forward -- war heroes, etc.
ITS THE MACHINES AND THE PEOPLE WHO PROGRAM THEM.Let me say this ONE MORE TIME: If you can use a Spreadsheet, you can FIX an election. (For easy step by step instructions, go here:
http://www.chuckherrin.com/hackthevotedemo.htm)
If you can program a Las Vegas slot machine, or calculate credit card interest, you can calculate the number of votes needed to make one candidate win and the other lose within a reasonable margin of error.
And if you are caught, you call it a glitch, and no one goes to jail.
Its a recipe for the destruction of democracy, and giving money to any party that isn't trying to FIX THE PROBLEM is a complete waste of effort in my not-so-humble-opinion.