Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

High Court Trims Whistleblower Rights

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
dogday Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-30-06 04:06 PM
Original message
High Court Trims Whistleblower Rights
Edited on Tue May-30-06 04:09 PM by dogday
The Supreme Court scaled back protections for government workers who blow the whistle on official misconduct Tuesday, a 5-4 decision in which new Justice Samuel Alito cast the deciding vote.


In a victory for the Bush administration, justices said the 20 million public employees do not have free-speech protections for what they say as part of their jobs.


Critics predicted the impact would be sweeping, from silencing police officers who fear retribution for reporting department corruption, to subduing federal employees who want to reveal problems with government hurricane preparedness or terrorist-related security.


Supporters said that it will protect governments from lawsuits filed by disgruntled workers pretending to be legitimate whistleblowers.

http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/n/a/2006/05/30/national/w132119D75.DTL&type=politics


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Squatch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-30-06 04:12 PM
Response to Original message
1. "Supporters said that it will protect governments"
Since when is the government in the business of protecting the government and not the right's of the People?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dogday Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-30-06 04:13 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Since we let the little black box
tell us the truth......:tinfoilhat:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
notadmblnd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-30-06 04:16 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Since Alito and Roberts took the bench?
nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
necso Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-30-06 04:45 PM
Response to Original message
4. PDF
http://www.supremecourtus.gov/opinions/05pdf/04-473.pdf

Source page for recent decisions: http://www.supremecourtus.gov/opinions/05slipopinion.html

All three dissents are worth a read.

It appears that Roberts' strategy ("narrow" decisions) is a savvy one.

The so-called Kennedy Court looms large.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Coexist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-30-06 04:59 PM
Response to Original message
5. knr
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dogday Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-30-06 07:20 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. This is a must read
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 09:25 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC