Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The question is: What does Bush think a "terrorist" is?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
pdxmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-14-06 12:03 PM
Original message
The question is: What does Bush think a "terrorist" is?
The Republicans keep insisting that all of this surveillance is to find the "terrorists" and those that want to do harm to this country. But we know that they have spied on the Quakers, Greenpeace, anti-war groups, peace activists, PETA, and who knows what others. I believe that the domestic spying that is going on is illegal, under the 4th amendment. But let's assume that it's legal. My next concern is whose definition of "terrorist" is being used? How does this administration define someone who "wants to do harm to this country"?

We know there is an active move to stifle dissent. And I believe that this administration would use dissent as an excuse to name a group or an individual a threat to this country. We hear almost weekly about some poor innocent who finds out they're on a watch list, and that there is no way to get them off. Wasn't it Sen. Kennedy who was on a watch list? How does that happen?

No way do I believe this spying isn't being used against average citizens. No way do I believe it's a list of a bunch of phone numbers with no identifying information. What would be the purpose of phone numbers if they didn't follow up with identifying information? They are lying, they are spying and they are going to continue to get away with these fishing expeditions if Congress and the media doesn't engage in full-fledged oversight.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
wakeme2008 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-14-06 12:06 PM
Response to Original message
1. Well it starts is a big D..
:grr:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pdxmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-14-06 12:09 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. That "you're either for us or against thing" huh? All of us that are
in the "against war" column are a danger in his small little mind.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hubert Flottz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-14-06 12:07 PM
Response to Original message
2. 200 million Americans
Edited on Sun May-14-06 12:08 PM by Hubert Flottz
He's insane...

EDIT...Bush is the World's Worst Conspiracy Nut...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rustydog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-14-06 12:13 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. Dead on! nuff said
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
johnaries Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-14-06 12:11 PM
Response to Original message
4. Terrorist = Freedom Loving Liberals.
Remember, his job would be so much easier if he was the dictator (aka Unitary Executive).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
crappyjazz Donating Member (886 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-14-06 12:12 PM
Response to Original message
5. I'm more interested in who defines what an "ordinary" American is
That scares me more.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-14-06 12:16 PM
Response to Original message
7. Anyone who would seriously threaten his Regime.
Right now that would be his 29% approval rating and Fitzgerald. I would like to say it means OBL, but apparently Big Benny only comes out before and after election cycles. :(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
neoblues Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-14-06 12:16 PM
Response to Original message
8. Terrorist is just a word meaning some nebulous...
unstoppable, evil monster with which to scare the children into needing their Daddy's protection; as in a means to an opportunity--the opportunity to grab more power. Hence the "war" on "terror".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
reichstag911 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-14-06 12:31 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. Thus has it always been.
Edited on Sun May-14-06 12:32 PM by reichstag911
Look back on any anti-authoritarian insurgency/revolution in history, and those fighting for people to have a greater voice in their own governance have always been labelled "terrorists" or some equivalent thereof.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 04:30 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC