Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bill Kristol just gave away the Republican talking points for 2007-08.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
Zen Democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-27-06 11:20 PM
Original message
Bill Kristol just gave away the Republican talking points for 2007-08.
He is glad the Democrats will take the House because Nancy Pelosi will be Speaker, and Charlie Rangel and John Conyers will be powerful committee chairmen. The gop will use FoxNews and RW talk radio to go after them ... women and blacks running Congress ... to fire up that damned base of bigots and morons so they can take back the WH and the Congress in 2008.

That's the "plan". That's all they've got.

Sounds like last-ditch, defeatist rationalizing. In my opinion, the Republicans won't win the WH again for a very, very long time.

And ... anyone that missed The Colbert Report tonight with Bill Kristol, do yourself a favor and catch the rerun later tonight or tomorrow. You won't be sorry. Colbert was brilliant. And Kristol was .... speechless.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
neuvocat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-27-06 11:24 PM
Response to Original message
1. That's what happens
when your platform is just nothing but self-serving rhetoric suited for the corporations.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Atman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-27-06 11:24 PM
Response to Original message
2. I think you're far too optimistic
I think Kristol is probably right on target. And even if it wouldn't work in the "real" world, it will skew things just enough to make a 2008 election win very plausible in a Diebold world.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zen Democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-27-06 11:33 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. I'm not being overly optimistic, I think.
Because all the while Nancy Pelosi and John Conyers and Charlie Rangel are among those running the House, there are two possible scenarios:

(1) George W. Bush will still be the petulant little president wreaking havoc and strutting like George III.

(2) George W. Bush will morph into the old Texas Governor Bush who worked with a Democratic legislature and played the congenial good old boy who didn't make waves.

I don't think either George W. Bush, or any other George W. Bush he might conjure up, would have a drop of credibility. You lose credibility once and you don't ever get it back.

I thought it was interesting that Bill Kristol suggested Mitt Romney as the 2008 Republican nominee.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Benhurst Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-27-06 11:33 PM
Response to Reply #2
8. And Diebold will deliver both the Senate and House back to the Repubs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mayberry Machiavelli Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-27-06 11:25 PM
Response to Original message
3. Well that's a chance we're willing to take (winning the House back).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eric J in MN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-27-06 11:27 PM
Response to Original message
4. I'll believe Democrats have taken control of the House
Edited on Thu Apr-27-06 11:27 PM by Eric J in MN
when I see it.

Right now, gerrymandering, aka "Operation Ratfuck" done after the 1990 census, makes it unlikely.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Erika Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-27-06 11:30 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. Most GOP say vote for the incumbent
For anyone to believe the Republicans can be elected again is very amusing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
prolesunited Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-27-06 11:29 PM
Response to Original message
5. OMG!!! The women and minorities are in charge
Run for your lives.

How could they possibly screw it up any worse than these white men in charge.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tsuki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-28-06 06:25 AM
Response to Reply #5
26. I'll take Conyers over ol' Tex anyday! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Singular73 Donating Member (999 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-27-06 11:35 PM
Response to Original message
9. Idiotic
Bush will still be President in 2007.999999

If he thinks that the American public will blame democrats after 2 years of house rule, he is on frikken LSD.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ignacio Upton Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-28-06 11:02 AM
Response to Reply #9
34. Well, the public has a short attention-span
And a President can still blame the opposite party in Congress, even if they have only controlled it for two years. When Harry Truman was running in 1948, he blamed the Republican-controlled Congress for blocking his agenda, even though they only got control of Congress in 1946 (although conservative southern Democrats also helped the GOP, and Truman's agenda would have actually helped the public, rather than Bush's scorched earth policies that Congress is passing.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-28-06 12:00 AM
Response to Original message
10. I like Rangel, but he's not a good ad for Democrats.

He looks and talks like a corrupt big city politician. That's how he plays to Joe and Mary Shit in flyover USA.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Erika Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-28-06 12:10 AM
Response to Reply #10
11. I love Charlie Rangel
Edited on Fri Apr-28-06 12:11 AM by Erika
He's got the guts to call the shots as he sees them. I only wish I could vote for him.

I, for one, are getting sick of pandering to the fly over country. Those states suck off the blue states and still bitch like hell. Their farm subsidies are obscene.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-28-06 12:17 AM
Response to Reply #11
12. Agreed. I really like Rangel too.

We need SOMEONE to start calling farm 'subsidies', 'welfare'.

Still, I don't think Rangel is a good spokesman for Dems. I'd say the same about Schumer. I kind of like Barney Frank because he can be so damned funny. I think humor is a great way to win over people, red and blue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HuskerDU Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-28-06 04:23 AM
Response to Reply #12
20. Your post and the one directly above it are evidence of the
reason that 'fly over staters' tend to vote R. What arrogant, elitist drivel. I wouldn't vote R with a gun to my head, but now I understand why some of my fellow red staters feel the way they do.

I encounter farmers all day every day. From the sweat on their brows, to the stains on their overalls and the shit on their boots, I guarantee you that they work a hell of a lot harder than you and probably for a hell of a lot less.

Let's say that a tidal wave hits your high rise office building and wiped out all of the work you had done that year. You would still get paid right? Well farmers have that possibility every year.
If your work gets wiped out, some big city big wigs lose some dough. Big deal. If farmers lose their entire crop and were wiped out financially, how would they plant next springs crop? If few or no farmers plant in the spring, how could you needy big city types feed your faces when the only thing you produce is smog?

People out here don't need city slickers. At all. We produce vast quantities of food for you so we can buy our fancy trinkets. We like trinkets, but don't need them. What we need, we have. We can grow, hunt, and fish our own food, and build our own houses. You= trinkets, beads, and shiny things to us. Us= food to you.

Try calling farm subsidies 'welfare' and winning ANYTHING in the flyover states. Better yet, try telling a farmer with 4 missing finger tips and shit on his boots that he is on welfare.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wellstone dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-28-06 07:26 AM
Response to Reply #20
28. Absolutely
My father's family is/were proud North Dakota farmers, tenant farmers during the depression. I don't think there is a republican in the bunch. A number have run for the state legislature in ND. One of my favorite things to do after an election was to call my uncle, who had a 3rd grade education and who had helped built the interstate through ND, after each election. And he was so proud of his democratic senators. And when his neices spoke at his funeral, it was his democratic politics that were forefront. I wouldn't trade one of this bunch of hardworking, community-serving, red state democrats for those of us who live the easy life, being liberal in a blue state.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KoKo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-28-06 12:22 AM
Response to Reply #10
13. He's a decorated veteran of the Korean War...and a really good guy
if you've ever heard a long interview with him. Grew up poor and his experience in Korea allowed him to use GI Bill to educate himself.

Lot's of folks in the Northeast talk like big city repugs...he's from NewYawk...and he's just great.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Guaranteed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-28-06 01:07 AM
Response to Reply #10
16. No, no no. We're not letting them do that. 2008 is about BUSH
my friend.

Don't let them frame shit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
otohara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-28-06 12:35 AM
Response to Original message
14. Worth A Second Watch
Kristol was dumbfounded - Bravo Steven
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Guaranteed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-28-06 01:06 AM
Response to Original message
15. ROFL! If they've got the House....
Well, we've got the CHIMP.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Guaranteed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-28-06 01:08 AM
Response to Original message
17. FOLKS. THREE WORDS: IT'S ABOUT BUSH.
Don't let this clown scare you. Bush has spent six years fucking up our country in a thousand different ways.

THAT is what 2008 is about.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nomad559 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-28-06 03:02 AM
Response to Original message
18. (Video) William Kristo On The Colbert Report
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Twist_U_Up Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-28-06 04:17 AM
Response to Original message
19. They will "steal " enough and place their DINOs stategically.
We now live in the Banana Republic of Amerika.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Robbie Michaels Donating Member (612 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-28-06 04:32 AM
Response to Original message
21. I Hope That Is Their Plan
Declaring "open season" against minorities and women in Congress could be the death of the GOP, if not bring it to its knees in 2008.

Go for it, Kristol. Please. I'm begging you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emanymton Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-28-06 04:39 AM
Response to Original message
22. Don't Want To Rain On Your Parade...
GOP strategy has fixed the elections by fixing the voting machines. Everything you say may be true. But does it matter if the system is broke?

snip ...

In my opinion, the Republicans won't win the WH again for a very, very long time.

snip ...

What makes you think shrub and Co will allow the elections to be held?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zen Democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-28-06 07:31 AM
Response to Reply #22
29. Don't feel so hopeless, my friend.
Edited on Fri Apr-28-06 07:33 AM by Zen Democrat
Americans are waking up. Look what happened in Nepal. Look what happened in the Ukraine. Look what happened in the Soviet Union. When people have had enough and are willing to face whatever consequences may befall them, and march to the citadels of power to confront their totalitarian government ... no government can stand up to that, regardless of how many bombs or guns or secret prisons they may have. They can't shoot everyone. They can't jail everyone. They can't survive when the society has had enough.

Remember, Romania? The people just went in and took the dictator out. When it gets bad enough, the police and military become one with The People. People really DO have the power.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emanymton Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-28-06 07:51 AM
Response to Reply #29
30. It Really Is A Case Of Us Versus Them
Keeping faith is becoming very difficult given how complacent the people of USA have become. There may be hope. 1 May will be a real test of the mood of the people.




Bush Lied. People Died. Media Cheered.

Shut It DOWN!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Peter Frank Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-28-06 05:18 AM
Response to Original message
23. You forgot to mention - Colbert hit William Kristol with the PNAC bomb...
Edited on Fri Apr-28-06 05:19 AM by Peter Frank


January 26, 1998



The Honorable William J. Clinton
President of the United States
Washington, DC


Dear Mr. President:

We are writing you because we are convinced that current American policy toward Iraq is not succeeding, and that we may soon face a threat in the Middle East more serious than any we have known since the end of the Cold War. In your upcoming State of the Union Address, you have an opportunity to chart a clear and determined course for meeting this threat. We urge you to seize that opportunity, and to enunciate a new strategy that would secure the interests of the U.S. and our friends and allies around the world. That strategy should aim, above all, at the removal of Saddam Hussein’s regime from power. We stand ready to offer our full support in this difficult but necessary endeavor.

The policy of “containment” of Saddam Hussein has been steadily eroding over the past several months. As recent events have demonstrated, we can no longer depend on our partners in the Gulf War coalition to continue to uphold the sanctions or to punish Saddam when he blocks or evades UN inspections. Our ability to ensure that Saddam Hussein is not producing weapons of mass destruction, therefore, has substantially diminished. Even if full inspections were eventually to resume, which now seems highly unlikely, experience has shown that it is difficult if not impossible to monitor Iraq’s chemical and biological weapons production. The lengthy period during which the inspectors will have been unable to enter many Iraqi facilities has made it even less likely that they will be able to uncover all of Saddam’s secrets. As a result, in the not-too-distant future we will be unable to determine with any reasonable level of confidence whether Iraq does or does not possess such weapons.


Such uncertainty will, by itself, have a seriously destabilizing effect on the entire Middle East. It hardly needs to be added that if Saddam does acquire the capability to deliver weapons of mass destruction, as he is almost certain to do if we continue along the present course, the safety of American troops in the region, of our friends and allies like Israel and the moderate Arab states, and a significant portion of the world’s supply of oil will all be put at hazard. As you have rightly declared, Mr. President, the security of the world in the first part of the 21st century will be determined largely by how we handle this threat.<snip>

Sincerely,

Elliott Abrams

Richard L. Armitage

William J. Bennett

Jeffrey Bergner

John Bolton

Paula Dobriansky

Francis Fukuyama

Robert Kagan

Zalmay Khalilzad

William Kristol

Richard Perle

Peter W. Rodman

Donald Rumsfeld

William Schneider, Jr.

Vin Weber

Paul Wolfowitz

R. James Woolsey

Robert B. Zoellick

edit for link -- http://www.newamericancentury.org/iraqclintonletter.htm





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DoYouEverWonder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-28-06 05:48 AM
Response to Reply #23
24. I just watched the video
that was great.

Rummie's not a PNACer, he just signed a couple of letters. LOL.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
notadmblnd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-28-06 06:11 AM
Response to Original message
25. I saw it last night
it was great. I couldn't believe how tough Steven was on him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sendero Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-28-06 06:45 AM
Response to Original message
27. Condi Rice..
... hung the moon but Democratic females and African-Americans are scary.

Yeah, that's a (hypocritical, not to mention immoral and stupid) strategy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
knitter4democracy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-28-06 07:55 AM
Response to Original message
31. He sure trapped Kristol more than once.
Made him look like an idiot. :D

Oh, and I like the wife-beating thing. I hope Kristol's wife kicks his ass.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EVDebs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-28-06 10:47 AM
Response to Original message
32. We need a Democratic HOUSE and SENATE...
This bunch of goose-stepping idiots running the show have wrecked the 'free marketplace' of ideas. They've poisoned 'comity' and free debate with railroading tactics. We mustn't do to them what they've don to US, however. Let's let them justify their positions...

The silence will be deafening.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Norquist Nemesis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-28-06 10:49 AM
Response to Original message
33. So will he be a "Democrat Donor" and voter this year?
I look forward to seeing his name next to thousands of dollar amounts on newsmeat and opensecrets, but I won't hold my breath.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 06:10 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC