Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

A Fire Upon the Deep

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » DU Groups » Reading & Writing » Science Fiction Group Donate to DU
 
phantom power Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-04 05:33 PM
Original message
A Fire Upon the Deep
Anybody else think that the Zones of Thought was a cool idea? One of the few instances I can think of where somebody worked with a notion that the laws of physics might *not* be the same everywhere. Or, at least, not all physics is "accessible" from all locations. Even stranger, he seemed to imply that not all computations are possible, everywhere. As a computer scientist, I find that dubious, but strangely compelling, maybe because it so completely flies in the face of my own intuitions.
Refresh | 0 Recommendations Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
DrWeird Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-04 06:19 PM
Response to Original message
1. It's a great plot device.
Silly, but it still makes for great fiction.

I like that opening paragraph "...just beyond the Beyond."
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
phantom power Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-04 09:02 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. "How to explain? How to describe? Even the omniscient viewpoint quails."
That has to be on the short-list of most ambitious opening sentences, ever.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DrWeird Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-04 09:19 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. That opening makes my mind quail.
I don't know how many times I've reread that paragraph and wanted to start writing myself.

That universe he constructed opens up so many possibilities for the imagination.

Have you read the prequel?
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
phantom power Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-04 10:50 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Deepness in the Sky was great too
Pham, strategizing against that bad-ass dictator across decades, through cold-sleep. That was cool.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Fleurs du Mal Donating Member (511 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-04 08:22 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. Just read it this year
And it really was an excellent book.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
porkrind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-10-04 12:37 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. I actually liked it better.
I couldn't even get through "A Fire upon the Deep". Too long-winded and dry. Boring, sorry to say.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
phantom power Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-13-04 02:17 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. That's interesting. I had almost the inverse experience.
Although I liked both books, I thought that "Fire Upon the Deep" was faster-paced than "Deepness".
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
lazarus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-13-04 04:32 AM
Response to Reply #4
7. Pham rocks
I still think he was based on Lazarus Long, right down to the personality.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
YankeyMCC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-13-04 11:57 AM
Response to Original message
8. an actual thoery
Lee Smolin wrote a book a few years back on his theory about "evolving" physical laws that could mean that some parts of the universe has different laws.

http://www.buy.com/retail/product.asp?sku=30366656&loc=106&sp=1
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
phantom power Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-13-04 02:18 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. Can you describe any of his ideas?
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
YankeyMCC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-13-04 07:15 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. ah
well it's been a lot of years since I read the book and I'm no theoretical physist. All I can say is that he has speculated based on some gaps in string and quantum theory that the laws of physics actually have evolved over time since the big bang.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 11:56 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » DU Groups » Reading & Writing » Science Fiction Group Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC