|
But I really don't understand the ignorance of the HISTORY of racism. There was a definite "It's ok now" attitude by many posters. Or, it's a problem, but don't sweat the small stuff or, don't "see" racism when it isn't there" I was the one who brought up "Night of the Living Dead" Now this movie was produced in 1968, and had a black lead,--still very rare for it's time- with very overt racist scenes. I didn't feel like arguing about that movie, when a couple of folks jumped to it's defence. Among other things, they missed the significance of the year-- 1968-- what was going on then? What was the state of racism then? What were the common sterotypes of the black male? Why would I think that a scene where a black man hits a white women, and then ogles her was NOT racist or a least buying into racial sterotypes of it's time?
The original King Kong was clearly racist. This new movie may have removed that element or it may not have. But the arguments got away from the movie itself and began to discuss the nature of racism in a dismissive fashion, even when trying to stay on topic of the movie. That's the part that's scary. When racism is pervasive as ever, even if it has changed it's spots a bit, it's more than scary. It's dangerous and destructive. Everyone was screaming racism when New Oleans died, because we (I'm white) could point the fingers elsewhere. But the underlying rot of racism in our social structure is just dismissed? Our personal racist demons denied? Because It's "just" a movie?
Racism is a social (and mental) disease that HAS to be brought into the light to be fought. We can't afford to let it hide, like it does, in movies, in ads, in sports, in school policies, in government policies both local and national, the court systems. So I don't get it. I just friggin' don't get it. If anyone here can explain it to me, I'd appreciate it.
|