Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Cool animation showing the expansion of the International Space Station from 1998 to 2010.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Science Donate to DU
 
onehandle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-22-10 05:48 PM
Original message
Cool animation showing the expansion of the International Space Station from 1998 to 2010.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
lob1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-22-10 06:07 PM
Response to Original message
1. That's really cool, but they didn't show the installation of the Cobert
treadmill.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PhD Donating Member (284 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-22-10 11:34 PM
Response to Original message
2. Yippee! It'll be finished just in time to start dismantling it!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
comtec Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-10 02:57 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. I know, how fucking stupid is that?!
hopefully the rest of the world (the international part) will tell us (the US) to fuck off, and keep it in orbit!
Then keep it up there.
i mean we're giving up on space anyway.
scrapping the shuttle fleet, the only one in existence, with no replacement!
why can't they do that with the fucking military planes?!?!

god forbid we learn more about the universe!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joshcryer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-10 09:36 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. NASAs new budget extends the ISS until 2020, as long as the Cx'ers don't sabatoge it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheMadMonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-10 11:08 AM
Response to Original message
4. What a boondoggle. Highest achievable cost for minimum acceptable result.
Fact: It cost payload capacity to dump the external fuel tank. More could have been lifted to orbit by bringing it along.

And those tanks represent a hell of a lot of empty gas tight real estate.

With standardised interconnects and services and all that empty cubage the same number of shuttle missions could have given us a much bigger and much more useful orbital foothold with the potential to accomodate dozens or even more.

Combined with the scrapped Shuttle-C (for cargo) what we could have up there hanging over our heads could easily be ten times what's actually up there for not one red cent more.

How much of NASA's money ends up in projects abandoned (strangely enough to DARPA) at the moment they've proven themselves? The SCRAMJET and linear aerospike rocket being the two with the biggest potential to lower launch costs.

How much more goes into building "one of" missions despite the disproportionate success they've had with their very limited forays into cheap standardised mission platforms?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joshcryer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-10 10:17 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. Yes, but it still ranks up there as one of the top three human achievements period.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pokerfan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-25-10 04:50 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. boondoggle is right
Comparison of living volumes:

Skylab: 283 m3
ISS: 373 m3

I probably don't need to remind anyone that Skylab was orbited with a single Saturn V launch.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 04:27 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Science Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC