Good or Useless, Medical Scans Cost the Same

[groovedaddy]

When Gail Kislevitz had an M.R.I. scan of her knee, it came back blurry, “uninterpretable,” her orthopedist told her.

Her insurer refused to pay for another scan, but the doctor said he was sure she had torn cartilage that stabilizes the knee and suggested an operation to fix it. After the surgery, Ms. Kislevitz, 57, of Ridgewood, N.J., received a surprise: the cartilage had not been torn after all.

She had a long rehabilitation. And her insurer paid for the operation. But her knee is no better.

More than 95 million high-tech scans are done each year, and medical imaging, including CT, M.R.I. and PET scans, has ballooned into a $100-billion-a-year industry in the United States, with Medicare paying for $14 billion of that. But recent studies show that as many as 20 percent to 50 percent of the procedures should never have been done because their results did not help diagnose ailments or treat patients.

“The system is just totally, totally broken,” said Dr. Vijay Rao, the chairwoman of the radiology department at Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, in Philadelphia.

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/03/02/health/02scans.html?_r=1&th&emc=th

[MannyGoldstein]

1. "A Picture Is Worth...

a thousand dollars". One hears that a lot working in the medical imaging field.

[sinkingfeeling]

2. One of the prime drivers of our ever-increasing cost of health care. I would believe that at least

half of all ordered scans are unnecessary.

[Ganja Ninja]

3. I just had a CT scan of my lungs last month.

Even with health insurance it cost me $700 out of pocket.