Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Paul Rogat Loeb: STIFFED: Why are Bailed-Out Banks Helping Pfizer Buy Wyeth?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Health Donate to DU
 
WillYourVoteBCounted Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-28-09 01:31 AM
Original message
Paul Rogat Loeb: STIFFED: Why are Bailed-Out Banks Helping Pfizer Buy Wyeth?
GREED


Stiffed: Why Are Bailed-Out Banks Helping Pfizer Buy Wyeth?
Edited on Wed Jan-28-09 01:22 AM by Paul Rogat Loeb


Are U.S. taxpayers getting stiffed? Pfizer, Viagra's daddy, is using money from taxpayer-bailed-out banks to help buy major pharmaceutical competitor Wyeth in a $68 billion deal. That won't help taxpayers or consumers. Nor is it designed to. It will harm the companies' workers, 20,000 of whom will likely be laid off. It's even likely to hurt small bio-tech companies, drying up potential sources of capital and leaving fewer potential major investors or purchasers.

The deal may be good for Pfizer, helping the company recover from a $2.3 billion legal settlement over misleading marketing on the pain reliever Bextra, and helping them amplify the clout of the $3 million they recently spent lobbying against the right to import cheaper drugs from Canada. But it won't help the rest of us.

So why are banks bailed out with taxpayer dollars furnishing the $22.5 billion of debt financing for this deal?

...more at the link over in DU Editorials and Other Articles


LADIES AND GENTLEMEN - WATCH THE BAILOUT MAKE OLD WHITE GUY CEOS RICH AND THOUSANDS OF EVERYDAY
EMPLOYEES POOR AND BANKRUPT



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Jim Sagle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-28-09 01:39 AM
Response to Original message
1. Why? Because they can.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CoffeeCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-28-09 02:07 AM
Response to Original message
2. I'm seriously wondering if the banks...
Edited on Wed Jan-28-09 02:10 AM by TwoSparkles
...were even the recipients of the bailout money.

The banks are a convenient vehicle that can be used to launder and funnel the money--to
select corporations. However, how do we even know that the banks are using that bailout
money?

They've absolutely refused to tell us what they're doing with that money. They won't account
for it. They said they were buying up toxic assets. That wasn't done. Then, they said that
they were going to freeze up the credit markets, and we all know that they aren't making loans.

I think, ladies and gentlemen, that the bailout money was put in a pile--and the corporations
that own this government will get money to enrich themselves, make themselves bigger or
recoup losses from lawsuits, etc.

Is it really coincidence that big Pharma gets the benefit of bailout money, when they've
been part of the corporate world that has dominated, lobbied and paid off our politicians
for years? Next, I bet the oil companies catch a windfall.

Paulson asked for this money and demanded it NOW--and even threatened Martial Law--because
he knew they had to have that bailout money before the economy really started tanking.

Anyone who doesn't get that the bailout was a big heist, is in denial.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dover Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-28-09 05:35 AM
Response to Original message
3. Is the current trend toward consolidation part of a plan for global restructuring?
Or is it opportunism? Probably a bit of both. There are plenty of white papers written about the necessity for companies to become more 'efficient' via cutting back the excessive number of competitors and merging/consolidating the bigger players (google IMF - "consolidation", for instance). So that is definitely one model that is being pursued. And IF that is the primary model
influencing policy and monetary decisions, then you have to wonder how they might go about creating an environment that makes its implementation possible and more affordable, while also shedding things like labor unions and pensions. Would it look something like what we have now? Have they stashed all their money away in some offshore accounts for just such a 'rainy day' to tide them over?

And of course, so long as the American people aren't making any fuss about footing the bill for much of the expense of such a transition (paying in more ways than one), why not?

Whatever the new 'model' might be, I get the feeling that we aren't going to become transparent enough to share the plan openly with the American public. I don't see any significant shift away from privatization and free market ideas by the Dems yet, so have to assume that's still part of the plan as well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fire_Medic_Dave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-30-09 01:10 AM
Response to Original message
4. Why do people criticize pfizer so much for Viagra?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WillYourVoteBCounted Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-30-09 01:36 AM
Response to Original message
5. This article (in the GD forum) was front paged today and had 21 recommends
Funny that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 01:29 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Health Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC