Addiction Doesn’t Discriminate? Wrong

[groovedaddy]

We’ve heard it before. “Drug abuse is an equal opportunity destroyer.” “Drug addiction is a bipartisan illness.” “Addiction does not discriminate; it doesn’t care if you are rich or poor, famous or unknown, a man or woman, or even a child.”

The phrase “addiction doesn’t care” is not meant to remind us that addiction casts a long shadow — everyone knows that. Rather, it is supposed to suggest that any individual, no matter who, is vulnerable to the ravages of drugs and alcohol.

The same rhetoric has been applied to other problems, including child abuse, domestic violence, alcoholism — even suicide. Don’t stigmatize the afflicted, it cautions; you could be next. Be kind, don’t judge.

The democratization of addiction may be an appealing message, but it does not reflect reality. Teenagers with drug problems are not like those who never develop them. Adults whose problems persist for decades manifest different traits from those who get clean.

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/09/02/health/26essa.html?th&emc=th

[Tandalayo_Scheisskopf]

1. I would suggest that...

You do a little research into Sally Satel. She is really way out on the fringe of addiction treatment and services.

[groovedaddy]

2. Yeah, after I posted this, I noticed that she was with the

American Enterprise Institute, which is a red flag.
Still, some of the points she makes in the article are valid.