>>>>
IV. Voter Fraud And The Press For Photo Id
The most common example of the harm wrought by imprecise and inflated claims of “voter fraud” is the
call for in-person photo identification requirements. Such photo ID laws are effective only in preventing
individuals from impersonating other voters at the polls — an occurrence more rare than getting struck by
lightning.16
By throwing all sorts of election anomalies under the “voter fraud” umbrella, however, advocates for such
laws artificially inflate the apparent need for these restrictions and undermine the urgency of other reforms.
>>
Royal Masset, the former political director for the Republican Party of Texas, concisely tied all of these strands
together in a 2007 Houston Chronicle article concerning a highly controversial battle over photo identification
legislation in Texas. Masset connected the inflated furor over voter fraud to photo identification laws and their
expected impact on legitimate voters:
Among Republicans it is an “article of religious faith that voter fraud is causing us to lose elections,”
Masset said. He doesn’t agree with that, but does believe that requiring photo IDs could cause
enough of a dropoff in legitimate Democratic voting to add 3 percent to the Republican vote.17>>>>
Allegations of Voter Fraud by Noncitizens
We are not aware of any documented cases in which individual noncitizens have either intentionally registered
to vote or voted while knowing that they were ineligible. Given that the penalty (not only criminal
prosecution, but deportation)130 is so severe, and the payoff (one incremental vote) is so minimal for any
individual voter, it makes sense that extremely few noncitizens would attempt to vote, knowing that doing
so is illegal.
Although there are a few recorded examples in which noncitizens have apparently registered or voted, investigators
have concluded that they were likely not aware that doing so was improper. In one highly publicized
case, for example, noncitizens were given voter registration forms by a group helping them through the naturalization
process, immediately after successfully completing citizenship interviews with federal officials and
receiving letters beginning “Congratulations, your application for citizenship has been approved.”131 Though
the actual swearing-in ceremonies were still up to 90 days away, these individuals most likely mistakenly
thought it their obligation and privilege to complete the paperwork, and did not intentionally fabricate their
citizenship status in front of federal officials who knew that they were noncitizens.
PDF Warning:
http://www.truthaboutfraud.org/pdf/TruthAboutVoterFraud.pdfBasically, they are saying that they have never even heard of a case where an illegal has intentionally tried to vote. It just does not happen. So they offer a solution without a problem. Only their solution hurts Democratic turnout.