Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Today's Cincinnati Enquirer: ''For Some, Ohio Still is Not Decided"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU
 
flpoljunkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-13-04 09:05 AM
Original message
Today's Cincinnati Enquirer: ''For Some, Ohio Still is Not Decided"
http://news.enquirer.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20041113/NEWS01/411130389

Saturday, November 13, 2004

For some, Ohio still is not decided

Kerry voters demand investigation of count

By Carl Weiser
Enquirer Washington Bureau

PROVISIONAL OHIO PRESIDENTIAL VOTES WAIT TO BE COUNTED

WASHINGTON - You thought the presidential election was over in Ohio?

President Bush, Sen. John Kerry, the Ohio secretary of state, and both national and state Democratic and Republican parties certainly think so.

But on the Web, in e-mails, on radio and on television, a mounting chorus of Kerry supporters is pushing the notion that Bush won Ohio through fraud, conspiracies or voting machine malfunctions.

"We know there have been way too many voting irregularities for this to be a glitch," said Lisa Kelly, 45, of Middletown, Del., one of the army of Kerry supporters calling and e-mailing anyone she can to reopen the election in Ohio. "I think it is a concerted effort to affect the outcome of the election in a fraudulent manner."

<>Through Web sites like www.democraticunderground.org, www.blackboxvoting.org, www.dailykos.com, www.indyvoter.org, www.freepress.org and even one called www.recountohio.org, anti-Bush forces are pushing for investigations, recounts and even a retraction of Kerry's concession.

more...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
TrueAmerican Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-13-04 09:10 AM
Response to Original message
1. I thought it was
www.democraticunderground.COM not ORG?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flpoljunkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-13-04 09:16 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Indeed, it is. They got it wrong!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fasttense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-13-04 09:18 AM
Response to Original message
3. WE CRAZIES WHAT YOU GOING TO? MAYBE OUTLAW THE
Internet. That would stop citizens from thinking a few minor glitches in the election is fraud. Silly, silly people think their elections should run fairly, without serious glitches.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eowyn_of_rohan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-13-04 10:34 AM
Response to Reply #3
9. Perish the thought
that they could put some kind of lockdown on the internet. Not so implausible, given all the other alarming stuff coming down...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
teryang Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-13-04 09:20 AM
Response to Original message
4. Ooh, the dirty word, litigation
"For the last half century, anytime anyone has not liked something, they've litigated it," he said. "Why should elections be any different?"

I guess people with a legitimate grievance should man the barricades rather seek peaceful redress of injury in the third branch of government. Funny, how a CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT, access to the courts is now a dirty word to those elected by electrons rather than votes. But I guess it would be.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spotbird Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-13-04 09:29 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. Bush sued Gore.
Perhaps he should have waited.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
teryang Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-13-04 09:35 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. Corporations and the states sue each other
...and the states every day. Only individuals shouldn't use the courts. The hypocrisy on the issue is so staggering, it is unmentionable in the mainstream. Even democratic party loyalists including lawyers are totally brainwashed on litigation issues.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
recoveringdittohed Donating Member (463 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-13-04 09:22 AM
Response to Original message
5. More recount articles in Nov. 13 Cincinnati Enquirer (Indiana)
There were three more recount related articles in the print version of the Nov. 13 Enquirer with two of them to be be found on line. Links are below. The article not on line was about the Indiana Democratic Party requesting a recount of the U.S. House race in Indiana where incumbent Baron Hill D-IN lost by 1,485 votes.

Here are the links: http://news.enquirer.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20041113/NEWS01/411130379/1056

http://news.enquirer.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20041113/NEWS01/411130394/1056
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
newyawker99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-13-04 07:37 PM
Response to Reply #5
12. Hi recoveringdittohed!!
Welcome to DU!! :toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rose Siding Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-13-04 10:21 AM
Response to Original message
8. Kerry campaign, Terry Mac and the OH Dem spokesman all agree...
Meanwhile, the Democratic Party, the Kerry campaign, the secretary of state and political experts say that while there were hiccups and glitches on Election Day, there's no chance that the election was stolen, or that the results will be overturned.
.............
Terry McAuliffe, the national DNC chairman, was forced to issue a statement Wednesday noting that the election outcome is "undisputed."

"Unlike 2000, the Republicans simply received more votes than the Democrats in this election," he said. "We are not contesting the outcome of this election."
..............
Even Trevas, the spokesman for the state Democratic Party, said some of the calls that have come into state headquarters have been "crazy."

"We're trying to ferret out any suspicious activity, and if somebody has something then we'll go after it," he said. "But at this point, everything that seems to be suspicious is getting an answer provided ... The Internet is just fueling this stuff. What can you do?"
end snip>

Why they would make such difinitive statements before the counting's done is beyond me. I believe they are convinced.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
StopTheVotePirate Donating Member (2 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-13-04 12:03 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. FRAUD?
Karl Rove (?): "it is all over but the counting, WE will take care of the counting"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Straight Shooter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-13-04 10:43 AM
Response to Original message
10. "anti-bush," excuse me??? How about "pro-democracy"?
Dipwads. I don't have to hate bush to love democracy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 03:57 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC