Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Excellent statement by Bonifaz on SCOTUS ruling- spending limits.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU
 
livvy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-26-06 06:29 PM
Original message
Excellent statement by Bonifaz on SCOTUS ruling- spending limits.
I got this as a link in an email from his campaign. The pdf can be found here:
http://www.johnbonifaz.com/files/pressrelease20060626.pdf

He and NVRI have been working on a SCOTUS review of Buckley vs Valeo in the hopes of getting them to overturn this stupid ruling on spending limits. It really needs to be fixed. It's a nice response.


John Bonifaz
Democrat for Secretary of State

Contact: Juan Martinez, Campaign Manager, 617-524-5151 or 617-680-9410 (cell)

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: June 26, 2006
Bonifaz Issues Statement on Supreme Court Ruling
on Campaign Spending Limits

BOSTON – Voting rights leader John Bonifaz, Democratic candidate for Massachusetts Secretary of State, today issued this statement regarding the Supreme Court’s ruling on a Vermont campaign spending
limits law:

“A bare majority of the United States Supreme Court today has sanctioned again our nation’s system of unlimited campaign spending. The Court is as wrong today as it was 30 years ago when it first ruled on this matter in Buckley v. Valeo, striking down congressional campaign spending limits passed in the wake of the Watergate scandal.

“In its controlling opinion, the Court refuses to reconsider its Buckley ruling in the face of new facts and circumstances that demonstrate that unlimited campaign spending drowns out the voices of ordinary citizens and threatens the integrity of our electoral process. This opinion is short-sighted and does not reflect the reality in our elections today. Like the Court’s early rulings upholding the poll tax – only to be
later overturned, this ruling today is inconsistent with basic democratic principles and with the constitutional promise of political equality for all.

“With a record campaign spending limit set for the Governor’s race by Chris Gabrieli, and equally absurd limits set for the Lieutenant Governor’s race by Deb Goldberg and the Secretary of State’s race by Bill
Galvin, Massachusetts is yet another example of auction-block politics that threatens public confidence in our democracy. With pro-active leadership and grassroots pressure, we can overhaul our campaign finance system and return voters to power.

“As Massachusetts Secretary of State, I will press for state legislation that creates a system of full public funding of our elections coupled with voluntary campaign spending limits. I will also build and lead a
coalition of secretaries of state calling for a constitutional amendment to make clear that mandatory campaign spending limits are entirely consistent with the First Amendment.

“In his dissenting opinion, Justice John Paul Stevens stated that ‘the time has come to overrule’ the Court’s decision in Buckley. As Justice Stevens wrote: ‘Just as a driver need not use a Hummer to reach
her destination, so a candidate need not flood the airways with ceaseless sound-bites of trivial information in order to provide voters with reasons to support her.’

“History will prove Justice Stevens right.”

John Bonifaz, the founder of the National Voting Rights Institute, is a principal architect of the legal movement for revisiting the Court’s 30-year-old ruling that sanctioned the nation’s system of unlimited
campaign spending. He served as co-counsel on behalf of a coalition of Vermont voters and organizations in defense of the Vermont law and helped marshal a series of friend-of-the-court briefs in support of the
Vermont law, including one from a coalition of secretaries of state.
# #
P.O. Box 300007, Jamaica Plain, MA 02130 www.johnbonifaz.com [email protected]
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
acmejack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-26-06 07:35 PM
Response to Original message
1. Ah, the Bush Court
They promise to make us miserable for many years to come. These last few rulings are but a taste of what they will do to the lower classes, and make no mistake that is what they will ensure we shall be, during their long ugly, tenure, as they defile the law of the land.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 05:31 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC