Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Slashing Away Denial, Revealing The Ongoing Theft: Miller on US Elections

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU
 
IndyOp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-15-06 02:29 PM
Original message
Slashing Away Denial, Revealing The Ongoing Theft: Miller on US Elections
This interview is incredible in scope - the GOP culture of corruption; racist disenfranchisement in Georgia and Virginia; Florida and Ohio; the complicit Supreme Court; Plame-gate; the hypnotized US media; Ney and Coingate; more!

The upshot: We will soon discover that the whole vile web of bribery and kickbacks - and no doubt extortion that has funded GOP's work to control "elections."

Read the *whole* thing!

Mark Crispin Miller Connects the Dots on Election Problems
A BUZZFLASH INTERVIEW (Part 1 of two parts).

BuzzFlash: Your book, Fooled Again: How the Right Stole the 2004 Elections & Why They'll Steal the Next One Too (Unless We Stop Them), makes a convincing case that Bush/Cheney stole the last election. It's not mere speculation, but a solid survey of appalling facts, all of them carefully documented. And yet there are a lot of people out there, many of them liberals, who seem unable or unwilling to accept the possibility that this administration would resort to vast election fraud.... But that view seems ever more absurd, as the Bush Republicans keep making flagrant moves to thwart democracy by rigging the electoral system to their own advantage. For instance, Bush has recently made two astonishing appointments to the Federal Elections Commission. One is Hans von Spakovsky, who helped Bush/Cheney steal the Florida election in 2000. The other is Robert D. Lenhard, the husband of Viveca Novak-the Time reporter who tipped off Karl Rove's lawyer that Matt Cooper, her colleague at the magazine, knew that Rove had outed Valerie Plame. So Rove went back to testify again to the grand jury, to tell them he had come across an e-mail that reminded him that he did meet with Cooper. So now the husband of this woman has been nominated to the FEC! What are we to make of such gross impropriety? Bill Clinton never could have got away with it.

Mark Crispin Miller: Let me begin by making a general point. When a movement tries to force an alien agenda on a democratic nation, it must devote itself full-time to that endeavor. The subversion of electoral democracy must be the movement's overriding goal, because it's very difficult to disenfranchise a majority....Because the US press refuses to go near the issue of election fraud, it's easy to assume that Bush & Co.'s subversion of the last election was just one of many dark endeavors. That assumption would be dangerously wrong. The subversion of American democracy is the primary interest of the Bush Republicans, whose vast electoral shenanigans were but a part of their ongoing program - a program not at all conservative, but anti-democratic and anti-republican. <snip>

BuzzFlash: Let's talk some more about the silence of the press. Last year it was reported in the Boston Globe that one James Tobin, who was Bush/Cheney's Northeast campaign coordinator in 2004, was convicted of overseeing a phone-jamming operation in the 2002 elections in New Hampshire. Tobin's aim was to thwart the Democrats' get-out-the-vote efforts in four cities in the south part of the state. The conviction was reported in the Boston Globe and by AP, and that was it. The press ignored the story, even though it seemed to point to a far larger, deeper scandal. According to the Globe, the RNC was paying Tobin's sky-high legal fees - somewhere over $700,000 by August of 2005. By now, the total may well be a million dollars. This is not a major story? The man who ran Bush/Cheney's re-election campaign in New England is convicted of election fraud for having violated voters' rights two years before, also in New England; and his sky-high legal fees are paid by the Republican National Committee, which is, these days, an arm of the Bush/Cheney White House. Why is this not a story? Officially it is as if it didn't happen.

Mark Crispin Miller: Here's another pertinent story that the press recently ignored - a story about 2004. A few weeks ago, it came out that ACORN had prevailed in all three trials - two in Florida, one in Ohio - where they'd been sued for "voter fraud" by GOP-connected law firms. The last of the three cases was "dismissed with prejudice." This is highly significant, since ACORN's legendary criminality had long been trumpeted by right-wing propagandists as a veritable sea of evidence that all the fraud out there was Democratic handiwork. Nearly all the lurid propaganda tales of Democratic "voter fraud" concerned ACORN. Vented by a multitude of rightist pols and pundits, those tales ended up in countless mainstream news reports that airily referred to fraud committed "by both sides" in the 2004 campaign.

You connect those dots, and then connect them to the scandals now racking the GOP, because they also have to do primarily with election fraud. Tom DeLay's troubles stem directly from his close involvement in the party's efforts to subvert democracy through the construction of a permanent "majority." The gerrymandering in Texas, and the program to monopolize K Street, were both intended to help further weaken the electorate. Although the national press has shied away from it, the "Coingate" scandal in Ohio also has everything to do with the Bush Republicans' crusade against democracy. It was all about laundering enough cash to cover the huge off-the-books expenses of election theft, not only in Ohio, but from coast to coast. In fact, I believe that we will soon discover that the whole vile web of bribery and kickbacks - and no doubt extortion - that is just now making so much news, was ultimately at the service of the party's anti-democratic plans.


Mark Crispin Miller's book "Fooled Again is a must-read for anybody concerned about the health and preservation of our democracy." -- Joseph Wilson, author of "The Politics of Truth: Inside the Lies that Led to War and Betrayed My Wife's CIA Identity: A Diplomat's Memoir"

Mark Crispin Miller's blog
http://markcrispinmiller.blogspot.com/

BuzzFlash - Fooled Again: How the Right Stole the 2004 Election & Why They'll Steal the Next One Too (Unless We Stop Them)





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Stevepol Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-15-06 03:15 PM
Response to Original message
1. Tremendous interview. Miller is the Energizer Bunny right now. R&K!!
Edited on Sun Jan-15-06 03:16 PM by Stevepol
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndyOp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-15-06 04:02 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Exactly, right Stevepol -
:toast:

He has excellent company in Bob Fitrakis, Harvey Wasserstein, Rep. Conyers & McKinney - and 1,000's of unsung hereos around this nation who are daily fighting to restore democracy.

:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-15-06 03:24 PM
Response to Original message
2. K&R...........nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babsbunny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-15-06 05:27 PM
Response to Original message
4. Soon, the topic of Stolen Elections will longer be classified as a
Conspiracy Theory! We will be alright, especially after Rove is behind bars!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
autorank Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-15-06 05:56 PM
Response to Original message
5. The power of TRUTH!!! RECOMMENDED - Strongly
This guy just nails it. He is such a warrior. Of course "vote fraud" is a Republican spin, a projection of their own tactics onto their opponents. MCM is one of my warrior heroes along with Fitrakis. I'm glad BuzzFlash is getting even more involved in this issue.

Thanks--RECOMMENDED

We will prevail.

(you're "Born to Filibuster" graphic is great!)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nicknameless Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-15-06 06:55 PM
Response to Original message
6. Excellent.
K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FredStembottom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-16-06 12:58 AM
Response to Original message
7. Homework: (Re)read "The True Believer" by Eric Hoffer
Edited on Mon Jan-16-06 01:03 AM by FredStembottom
and never be taken by surprise again.

For those who don't know it, this is about a 50 year old book that points up the vital to understand personal dimension of fanaticism. Most importantly the Fanatic's adoption of fervent beliefs that may or may _not_ have any grounding in reality. Done so by persons who desire to wash away "failed" versions of themselves by fervently believing entirely new thoughts within a group of equally fervent believers.

Addressing any real-world conditions being, really, quite beside the point.

A swell quote: "The less justified a man is in claiming excellence for his own self, the more ready he is to claim all excellence for his nation, his religion, his race or his holy cause."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndyOp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-16-06 09:48 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. Thank you *very* much for the book recommendation -
I just ordered it from Amazon.com! It sounds like compelling reading...

:bounce:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FredStembottom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-16-06 11:54 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. You will never forget it.
And it will be a tool of understanding that you'll use from now on, I believe.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mod mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-16-06 10:55 AM
Response to Original message
9. Can someone explain this Dem recommendation to the FEC? (from interview)
* appointed Viveca Novak's husband to the FEC?
Buzzflash article says bu$h appointed Robert D. Lenhard, husband of Viveca Novak to the Fed Election Commission. this was the first I heard of this! Is this common knowledge?

Sorry if this has been widely know-so many fronts of attack, but this came from the Dems:

"To this agency, Senate Democratic Leader Tom Daschle and House Democratic Leader Nancy Pelosi recommend adding Lenhard, the associate general counsel of the American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees. Daschle and Pelosi claim that Lenhard "will faithfully administer the new campaign finance reform law in accord with the intent of Congress." Not likely. As AFSCME's lawyer, Lenhard argued in court that the restrictions on sham-issue ads — ads that attack or support a candidate under the guise of discussing an issue — are unconstitutional.

Predictably, Lenhard's appointment has already been endorsed by a range of organizations that run those thinly disguised campaign ads.

What makes this worse is that Daschle and Pelosi recommended Lenhard to replace Commissioner Scott Thomas. Thomas' term has expired, but he is eligible for, and sought, reappointment.

Thomas has shown that he believes in the campaign finance laws. For example, he dissented last year when the commission issued rules that undermine the newly enacted McCain-Feingold law. You might have thought Thomas' actions would endear him to Daschle and Pelosi, who often claim they support the new law. Not so. Instead, they are punishing Thomas for the sin of taking Congress seriously when it voted to crack down on campaign finance abuses.

http://www.fecwatch.org/news/editorials/lenhard.asp
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndyOp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-17-06 09:25 AM
Response to Reply #9
11. My only thought: Pelosi's staff recommended Lenhard or he is a
friend of a friend of a friend. It isn't wasn't you are capable of, or worthy of, that matters - it is who you know. My bet is that she just isn't processing current events as threats to our system of government - the insiders think it is still the same old game...

:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VeryZexyLiberal Donating Member (10 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-17-06 04:10 PM
Response to Original message
12. Interesting
Thank you
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 06:33 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC