Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login

EAC Submission on behalf of CEPN

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU
Einsteinia Donating Member (645 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-30-05 01:24 PM
Original message
EAC Submission on behalf of CEPN

The CALIFORNIA ELECTION PROTECTION NETWORK, a non-partisan organization of over 25 groups coming together to achieve their mutual election integrity goals has voted to:

1) Affirm the audit protocol standards set forth in Pennsylvanias HB 2000.
(See: )

2) Further, in honor of all those who have given their lives in the name of democracy, we respectfully request that Section 6.8 be amended to require the following:

Gold Standard Audit Protocol
All state elections shall have (at the States expense):

PAPER BALLOTS: Accessible, voter-verifiable, paper ballots, meeting at least the following minimum specifications: paper ballots printed with 14 pt. type using individual 8.5 x 11 20 lb. archival paper stock (which shall be kept for at least 5 years as proof of the election result).

HAND COUNTS: A manual audit which relies on human eyes.

STATISTICALLY SIGNIFICANT SAMPLING: Select a minimum of 5% of all precincts (and precincts cannot exceed 1000 voters). Within these selected precincts, audit 100% of the paper ballots; or in their absence, the paper trails.

GENUINELY RANDOM: Genuinely random selected samples (not at the discretion of election officials).

PUBLIC OVERSIGHT: Each political participating political party may form delegations to witness every step of the election process. Results of each tally posted publicly on a public-accessible posting at the precinct site, as well as on a public-accessible portion of the Secretary of States web site in a comma-delimited format (e.g. a format that may easily be extracted into a word processing or spreadsheet software), BEFORE the data is transferred from the precinct (e.g. to the countys central tabulator).

RECOURSE: Any discrepancies between the machine tally and the audit Gold Standard audit protocol shall require the State to repeat this Gold Standard Audit protocol; however, each time the sample size shall increase by 10%. The final result of this audit process supersedes the finding of the initial tally and is binding.

EQUIPMENT: All voting system equipment must be guaranteed by manufacturer for 30 years, and a full disclosure of ALL equipment used in our voting systems must be posted on the Secretary of States web site in an easy-to-access publicly announced location, along with the equipment true total cost (including maintenance contracts, supplies). In addition this same web site location will disclose the equipment certification(s) of system integrity, person(s) who sign off on the purchase agreement, purchase agreement and cost of the equipment. Failure of election officials to keep this information current shall be grounds for their dismissal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Einsteinia Donating Member (645 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-01-05 12:22 AM
Response to Original message
1. Hey, flames, complaints or brainstorms?
Oh, okay. . . .

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
autorank Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-02-05 04:07 PM
Response to Original message
2. This is a great idea. In Oregon, voting rights/electing integrity
folks worked out a three tiered audit protocol that can be done quickly and cheaply and provides en ought statistical integrity to satisfy everyone out there. The largest county in the state and the state elections officials are very receptive and collaborated with the group on this. What a concept!

The only people who oppose comprehensive measures like this are motivated by something other than a concern for free and fair elections.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Jul 24th 2017, 12:07 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC