Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Recent RNC touchiness about election fraud claims

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU
 
TexasLawyer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-07-05 02:16 PM
Original message
Recent RNC touchiness about election fraud claims
Edited on Sat May-07-05 02:18 PM by TexasLawyer
This is an excerpt from a long letter that my elderly mother in Iowa received a few weeks ago from Ken Mehlman on behalf of the RNC. (The letter accompanied the "official CENSUS OF THE REPUBLICAN PARTY" which asked some very scary questions like: "Do you support the use of air strikes against any country that offers safe harbor or aid to individuals or organizations committed to further attacks on America?" Iran, perhaps?!? )

My mother is a very well-mannered, genteel woman, but she forwarded Kenny-boy's letter to me with a note saying "Can you believe this Sh%$"? Mom is a life-long Democrat, so I have no clue why she received anything from the RNC.

One interesting aspect of the letter is its focus on the 2004 election. The RNC acknowledges that the results were razor-thin, and that switching a mere 60,000 votes in Ohio would have changed the results of the election.



REPUBLICAN NATIONAL COMMITTEE

Ken Mehlman
RNC Chairman

Senator Bill Frist
Majority Leader

Congressman Dennis Hastert
Speaker

Congressman Tom Delay
Majority Leader

Dear Fellow Republican,

You are among a select group of Republicans who have been chosen to take part in the official CENSUS OF THE REPUBLICAN PARTY.



<snip>

Our margins are razor-thin. Liberal Democrats in the U.S. Senate can still kill almost any legislation that President Bush proposes and they can stop his appointment of judicial nominees. So real reform depends on maintaining and extending our Republican majorities in the House and the Senate. not iust now. but over the next 10 years.

And that starts with including Republicans like you in formulating our BLUEPRINT, then identifying, educating and turning-out Republicans on Election Day.

The last three national elections have been extremely close. In 2002, we came within a few thousand votes of losing the House and Senate to the Democrats and liberal special interests.

And I don’t need to tell you how critical the get-out-the-vote effort was to our Party in 2004, when President George W. Bush won re-election by just 3%.

New Hampshire was decided by just 9,171 votes; Wisconsin by 11,813 votes and Pennsylvania by 128,869 votes out of 5,676,212 votes cast in the keystone state. In fact, if 60,000 votes had gone the other way in Ohio in 2004 . . . John Kerry would be President today.


That’s why your REPUBLICAN PARTY CENSUS DOCUMENT is so important.

It all comes down to old-fashioned methods of grassroots contact - phone calls, door-to-door canvassing, postcards and letters to likely Republicans.

Believe me, the Democrat Party is angry. The radical liberals are once again screaming that Republicans stole the election. And if you look at the facts, the Democrats set voter turnout records and fundraising records in 2004 as well.

There is no question, the Democrats will be back with a vengeance. And historically the party in the White House loses seats in Congress in the off year. So you can bet the Democrats will be rejuvenating their deflated base for 2006 and for the 2008 presidential campaign.

And liberal special interest groups like People for the American Way, the Trial Lawyers and MoveOn.org, emboldened by their influence in 2004, are already filling their campaign coffers for 2006. Republican candidates at all levels will need the RNC’s help.


<snip>

The entire letter and "Official CENSUS OF THE REPUBLICAN PARTY" is posted here:

http://bannister.us/weblog/on/2005/02/24/census-of-the-republican-party/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Lucky Luciano Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-07-05 02:18 PM
Response to Original message
1. SO anyone who does not respond is put on
some kind of terrorist watch list or something?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wapsie B Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-07-05 02:21 PM
Response to Original message
2. Yeah, they're touchy because deep down they know
fraud was the only thing getting them in and keeping power. I love how special interest groups are only for liberals. Another way they frame the debate.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-07-05 02:25 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. i do not think it is so much being touchy as instilling fear in there mem-
bers. (and this letter was an oops..).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MissWaverly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-07-05 02:22 PM
Response to Original message
3. you should keep on top of this
this may be an attempt to purge her from the voting rolls, remember those "unanswered letters" which caused them to purge rolls.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasLawyer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-07-05 02:36 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. Good point
I hadn't thought of that. The guy who has this posted on his blog is also not a Republican. They emphasize that they are being so careful about who gets this census, but they sure seem to be sending it to people who have no business receiving it!

***********************

Enclosed is your new GOP CENSUS DOCUMENT which was assigned and prepared especially for you as a representative of all Republicans living in your voting district.

Registration #: 6819-XXXX
Voting District Code: IDO3-13


Your answers will be used to develop a BLUEPRINT for the Republican Party for the next 10 years.

The 2000, 2002 and 2004 elections have all showed how critical it is that we identify and contact EVERY SINGLE POTENTIAL Republican voter in America to get them involved.

Because it is cost prohibitive for the Republican Party to print and mail an official REPUBLICAN PARTY CENSUS to each and every one of the 55,000,000 Republicans nationwide . . .

. . . your answers will represent the views and opinions of all Republican voters living in your voting district.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MissWaverly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-07-05 02:45 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. well it does say "Census" which means "head count"
remember they are ruthless, if I ever get any correspondence from them, I will immediately reply that I am a lifelong dem and wish to remain a registered dem voter, thank you very much.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasLawyer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-07-05 02:48 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. maybe you should say you're a Republican
so that you can keep yourself on the rolls!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MissWaverly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-07-05 02:56 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. I'd have trouble with all the please send money letters
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wilms Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-07-05 02:22 PM
Response to Original message
4. This is great news.
-snip-

The radical liberals are once again screaming that Republicans stole the election.

-snip


Well, yeah. It was stolen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MissWaverly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-07-05 02:53 PM
Response to Reply #4
9. interesting Wilms, I'm sure you notice
the quote that Bush won by just 3% and Blair won by 4%
Hmmmm, are you thinking what I'm thinking, how about the quote
that Bush won Ohio by 60,000 votes since the I believe the final
tally from Blackwell was 118,601 lead for Bush over Kerry.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rzemanfl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-07-05 02:56 PM
Response to Reply #9
12. He's talking about the swing, not the total. A swing of 60,000
would have overcome the suppression and stealing in Ohio. I'm sure the little closet queer got the math from the Dems.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MissWaverly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-07-05 02:57 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. this is not a gay issue, he's a wingnut
as a wingnut he deserves our scorn
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rzemanfl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-07-05 04:16 PM
Response to Reply #13
17. Yes, he is a wing nut, but he takes it up the, oh, never mind. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wilms Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-07-05 04:19 PM
Response to Reply #17
18. I'm not clear what sexual orientation has to do with this.
Please enlighten me, or yourself.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rzemanfl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-07-05 04:35 PM
Response to Reply #18
21. It is just another level of his hypocrisy-he won't tell folks which
side of the plate he swings from, but says, "trust me, we need to bomb Iran." Beyond that it is just homophobia on my part I guess, although I don't have a problem with HONEST gay people-so go figure.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wilms Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-07-05 05:05 PM
Response to Reply #21
22. Sounds like the big problem you have is with dishonest people.
Edited on Sat May-07-05 05:05 PM by Wilms
That's not really a problem.

I appreciate your thoughts. The hypocrisy thing is not lost on me, and gives me pause, but I tend to give a pass on that because it probably ain't easy to "come out", especially if you're into being a republican.

So for me, Mehlman is just creepy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rzemanfl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-08-05 03:05 PM
Response to Reply #22
23. Creepy indeed, he wants the Repugs to suceed, but not so well
that they stone him to death. Really though, I guess he is no more creepy than the Repugs who hide their mistresses (when they aren't choking them to heighten somebody's pleasure-your guess is as good as mine whose) and yap about "family values."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MissWaverly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-07-05 04:30 PM
Response to Reply #17
20. please remember about the Democrats thrown out
of Church because they were Dems, I agree that Ken is offensive but
try to stay away from labels, if someone disagrees with me fine
but no one likes being labeled. I call him a wingnut because he
supports regressive neocon policies that are demeaning our country
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wilms Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-07-05 03:01 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. Actually, he's more to the point than a lot of Dems.
It's important to remember that the 120K margin would require only 60K votes to be SWITCHED.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MissWaverly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-07-05 03:03 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. Bless you, that's what I was thinking
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rzemanfl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-07-05 04:24 PM
Response to Reply #14
19. But you can't take votes from a Republican and give them to
a Democrat, that would be just unamerican. You can't expect Mr. secret sexual orientation to say "if we had stolen just 60,000 less votes from John Kerry in Ohio he would be President" now can you?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rzemanfl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-07-05 02:53 PM
Response to Original message
10. How do I criticise this smary little faggot without sounding like
I'm homophobic?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emulatorloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-07-05 03:27 PM
Response to Original message
16. Wait a second! What happened to Bush's HUGE MANDATE/VALIDATION of
his policies that we kept hearing so much about from GWB and the BushBots?!?!?!


<snip>

The last three national elections have been extremely close. In 2002, we came within a few thousand votes of losing the House and Senate to the Democrats and liberal special interests.

And I don’t need to tell you how critical the get-out-the-vote effort was to our Party in 2004, when President George W. Bush won re-election by just 3%.

New Hampshire was decided by just 9,171 votes; Wisconsin by 11,813 votes and Pennsylvania by 128,869 votes out of 5,676,212 votes cast in the keystone state. In fact, if 60,000 votes had gone the other way in Ohio in 2004 . . . John Kerry would be President today.

<snip>
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
electropop Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-09-05 10:00 AM
Response to Original message
24. This is very encouraging.
I'm happy to see they are so frightened. We are going to start taking back power in 2006. They've screwed up absolutely everything they've touched, and finally Americans are beginning to see it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bill Bored Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-09-05 10:27 PM
Response to Original message
25. Actually, it was only 20,000 votes in IA, NM and NV!
Don't buy that 60,000 votes in OHIO crap!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 09:33 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC