BREAKING: Kerry/Edwards File More Ohio Election Motions

[WilliamPitt]

http://forum.truthout.org/blog/story/2005/2/24/183243/756

The documents have been posted.

[Goldeneye]

1. Great news. Thanks.

I'm going to check it out.

[bluestateguy]

2. Bush v. Gore!

Precedent is a bitch!

[Poppyseedman]

28. Precedent is a bitch!

It sure is.

That's why Bush v. Gore would be a terrible use of SCOTUS opinion in Ohio.

The SCOTUS Bush v. Gore opinion basically says, Florida SC ruling to recount ballots violated the 14 amendment and stuck down the Florida SC decision because the statewide recount would not happen soon enough to certify the election before the EC count was certified.

In other words, Florida electoral college votes would not count thus violating all Floridians 14th amendment who cast their vote.

[Pachamama]

3. Hmmm..what do you make of this Will? Seems too little too late, yet why

would Kerry have not been pushing harder earlier? :shrug:

[MeDeMax]

9. john & john said every vote would be counted...

on 11/3 & several times after that, so they are making good on their promise. :)

doesn't it make your heart swell in pride that our man never quits, says what he'll do and then does what he says.

[zann725]

35. Kerry has been awfully quiet lately. I was just thinking that.

n/t

[Left Brain]

116. On the contrary,

it seems to me that Kerry has been very active lately, and on issues that are important to us. In fact, it almost seems to me that he has had more positive mainstream media coverage than he did before the election.

Interesting timing... now that the inauguration is over, news has moved away from the election, and the White House is feverishly attempting to quiet the Guckert/Gannon story, Messrs Kerry and Edwards are busy in Ohio.

Appreciated reading that, William, thank you for the link.

[blm]

10. It was always going to come down to evidence.

That is how he worked as a prosecutor to prevent going to court and losing. If he didn't have a preponderance of the evidence he wouldn't have his office prosecute cases needlessly.

Whatever comes of this now will be for the good of the country, even though it may not work to Kerry's personal benefit.

This is also why they held on to some of the campaign funds.

[LittleClarkie]

17. Ah, the obsessive/compulsive Senator from Mass. rears his head yet again

God bless 'im.

I swear if I hear "too little too late" just ONE more time I'm gonna plotz.

"Too legit to quit" :D

[nashville_brook]

22. amen!

i miss John Edwards -- just really nice to have some news from that front.

[zann725]

36. This may all work out in the end. Now Shrub's cabinet nominees all lied

under oath. And if one card in this house of cards gets taken down by the courts, so go the rest. I really was quite disappointed with Kerry lately, but now I see perhaps he was proceeding cautiously all along. Though I promise not to get too hopeful yet...

Ironically (in a bit of serendipity), earlier today I put a new "Kerry/Edwards" bumper sticker on my car. (My old one got damaged in the car wash yesterday.)

[LittleClarkie]

42. He reminds me of Horton

as in "ever faithful."

He has a pattern of sticking with something, for years if he has to. He's still on the BCCI case after all these years, as the people who lost money in that bank take it to court, blasting the Bank of England for not doing more to help those people.

It may not be a fast-moving process, but I think we will see these little reports from time to time to let us know he's still on the case. Maybe something will eventually happen, maybe not.

I understand your caution, but I can't help but think that they pissed off the wrong fellow. It will be the end of them yet.

[FogerRox]

66. L-C said: "but I can't help but think that they pissed off the wrong-

-- fellow. It will be the end of them yet"

Put me in that catagory--along with 40 million of my friends.

[Amaryllis]

111. Is he still on the BCCI case? I didn't know that. Do you have more info,

or links or anything?

[LittleClarkie]

120. Here you go

It was more like him commenting than anything else, but I was impressed that his nose was still stuck in their business, remembering they can't even vote for him.

http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/articleshow/964026.cms

[Laurab]

73. I just have to say it...

"too little too late"

I don't MEAN it, but I had to say it - I've never seen anyone plotz before!

I am not at all surprised by the news. It does all come down to evidence, always did. Those two guys are not quitters, they're just SMART. If there's something to find, I believe they'll find it.

NGU!!!!

[LittleClarkie]

88. Here ya go

[Laurab]

108. Ok, Ok, I didn't mean it

seeing that ONCE is quite enough, thank you!

[LittleClarkie]

118. I just didn't want you to be disappointed, is all

So I came up with a nice cyber-plotz for ye.

I'm made as hell and I'm not going to take it any more!

Yaaarrrrgggghhh.

Hm. Maybe I should have put in Dean instead of the Hulk...

[WilliamPitt]

104. Read

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=203x334288

[Laurab]

110. Read - thank you Will! n/t

[gademocrat7]

4. Thanks and

Amen....

[babsbunny]

5. WOW!

I'm PLEASED!! Let's keep the election fraud on the front burner!

[WilliamPitt]

6. THE DOCUMENTS HAVE BEEN POSTED

[seito]

7. Thanks

:thumbsup:

[Wilms]

8. Well, jumpin' frogs!

Will, about six weeks ago you said things would start brewing in six weeks.

Nice.

[MelissaB]

11. Thanks and

nominated.

I want those damn ballots counted!

[TayTay]

12. Thanks Will!

This is great news. I was hoping my esteemed junior Senator would keep at it. I'm glad he hasn't given up, even though it will not benefit him personally. (And will be seen as too little too late by many folks, alas.)

[Laurab]

74. It will benefit him personally in that

it will show people that he indeed does what he says he's going to do. For some people no matter what he does, it will never be enough. For those of us who have studied Kerry a little closer, it is just in keeping with who he is. I believe he is a patriot above all, a politican second, and while he won't be sitting in the oval office anytime soon, I think our democracy (or lack of it these days), would be more important to him. As a prosecutor he never lost a case. That gives me great hope...

[cestpaspossible]

77. It benefits all Americans to have our votes properly counted....

[Laurab]

109. Of course, that goes without saying

why bother voting if it's a charade? And I think it basically was a charade this past election. It's just good to know offically that Kerry/Edwards are still involved, which I always suspected they would be.

[garybeck]

13. Is this the only outstanding case on the 2004 election?

Thanks for this article and info! Great to see it's still being pursued.

I'm wondering are there any other court cases that haven't been thrown out yet? I know bev harris has some cases pending in FL...

And what's the status of the Alliance For Democracy? I know they are getting screwed by a countersuit, but are we to believe they're done? I feel bad for Cliff and all of them, but I wonder if they're still planning to file another suit somewhere. I remember when they withdrew Moss V Bush they promised they were going to continue to collect evidence and file again somewhere else.

HOpefully at least one of these cases will bear fruit!

[zann725]

37. Yeah Will, what's happening with Cliff (& co.)?

n/t

[merh]

65. There is the Rois case pending in Ohio Federal as referenced in

the Court's order of 2/14 and I believe there is another one pending in Ohio Federal court. White may be the name of the plaintiff, but the easy to check is to use Pacer. As far as I know, Pacer only has access to federal dockets and not state filings.

http://pacer.uspci.uscourts.gov/

You have to register and if you view a docket or documents, you will be charged 8cents a page. They will bill you every 3 months or you can put it on a charge card.

If you want ohio cases, search under the party name of Blackwell.

[zann725]

80. Thanks much.

n/t

[Catamount]

14. Yeah, thanks Will! n/t

[Catamount]

15. Just another thought: tell KO!

Thanks

[Chicago1]

16. This is EXCELLENT News!!! I'm so happy :)

This is great news. I KNEW that they would keep fighting. They are both OUTSTANDING attorneys.


Waiting for the IMPEACHEMNT WHILE THE SCANDALS KEEP UNFOLDING
America's Work Stories
http://usaworkstories.blogspot.com
[email protected]

[zann725]

39. I'm telling you, Bushco are NOT going to serve out their term.

About 4 major psychics have said so. One in particular, I remember, said that by 2006, Bush would have NO connection with Power.

I still contend it IS Kerry's destiny to be President (and NOT as late as 2008). How we'll ever get this through the Repug-controlled court system will be a major miracle in itself, but....forever the optimist...fingers crossed!

[suziedemocrat]

50. Who are the 4 major psychics?

edit: typed 5 instead of 4 above.

Do you have links? I don't want to just lose Bush - but this entire administration, Chenny, Ashcroft, Rice, The entire lot!!! I can't beleive what they are doing to this country / world!

[zann725]

83. There were at least 2 threads here with links to the sources. I think

they were in December? I think they were referenced again in January? in another thread.

One of the psychics was the one who predicted Princess Di's death.

[electropop]

60. It doesn't take a psychic to see that.

The megalomaniacal behavior of Bushco just gets crazier and crazier, and they are rapidly losing even their base. Got a devoted rightie in my office, who has gradually come to hate Bushitler. At some point, they'll do something so over the top that the Repugs will be forced to impeach him and expel him from their party, in order to survive.

[suziedemocrat]

76. From your keyboard to God's ears!!! (or eyes?) n/t

[PaganPreacher]

98. Too late for Kerry, Zann.

A little thing called the "line of succession" stands in the way.

Here is the line of succession (no sign of John Kerry in there, sorry. But, Norman Mineta- SecTrans- is in the line, which makes him the highest-ranking Democrat in the United States.)

President
Vice President
Speaker of the House of Representatives
President Pro Tempore of the Senate
Secretary of State
Secretary of the Treasury
Secretary of Defense
Attorney General
Secretary of the Interior
Secretary of Agriculture
Secretary of Commerce
Secretary of Labor
Secretary of Health and Human Services
Secretary of Housing and Urban Development
Secretary of Transportation
Secretary of Energy
Secretary of Education
Secretary of Veterans Affairs

The Pagan Preacher
I don't turn the other cheek.

[MissWaverly]

115. did she mention

go directly to jail, DO not collect $200.00 in her psychic forecast for Bush & Co. Inquiring minds want to know.

[mod mom]

18. YoooWhoooo! Thanks Will. Come on Howard fight for the truth!!

TALK TO THE HOUSE JUDICIARY DEMS, THEY ARE A CLEARINGHOUSE FOR FRAUD EVIDENCE! Please don't do this to "stifle the left", we've put our time, money, heart and soul into this investigation. We need a leader to take this forward!!!! Great news! Fight on DEMS!

[earth mom]

19. Happy to see this! Thanks! eom

[autorank]

20. Dude!

[blue4barb]

21. Great news and thanks, Will.

This spark should keep the fire going. Now let's keep fanning the fire.

[AuntiBush]

23. Edwards would not be still digging if he didn't think he had a case!

Thanks Will. I do not believe knowing lawyers, and Edwards winning background they'd be doing this "still" less they had something.

"Federal Judge Edmund Sargus in Columbus, Ohio." Is he fair, unbias?

"97% of the ballots have yet to be counted by hand in Ohio and, more than often, the 3% of the vote that each county counted by hand was not randomly selected, as required by Secretary of State J. Kenneth Blackwell's own guidelines)" I still find this un-believable it's not touchable.

Do you think they have a chance?

P.S. Will: I'm having a time logging in to your blog. Any tips?

[ginnyinWI]

32. don't forget that John Kerry is a lawyer, too

He was a prosecutor and tried 7,000+ cases and won them all as Asst. D.A.

If anyone can bring this fraud to light, it's these two sharp guys and their team!

[zann725]

40. He won them all???

Wow.

[ginnyinWI]

44. actually, 7,265 cases in six years

Here is a link to an article about Kerry's years as a lawyer:
http://www.newyorker.com/fact/content/?040510fa_fact1

[Chi]

52. Sorry to ask...

Heya ginnyinWI <waves>
Might you have any links that show the perfect record as Asst. D.A.?

I read the the article you posted and I didn't see any mention of never losing.
It was a very nice article though, and thanks for posting it.

[ginnyinWI]

57. workin on it!

I asked the person who quoted Kerry as saying that he's glad to say he never lost a case while in Middlesex, and if they have a link, I'll post it here. :)

[Chi]

64. OK..I found some info, but not all.

Kerry is quoted saying what you have repeated "I'm glad to say I never lost a case in Middlesex" (his bio on his website), But I can't find the number you give 7000+.

He spent 3 years in Middlesex in the DA's office, 76 to 79.
52 weeks * 5 days * 3 years = 780 workdays in that office (approx)

Which would equate to (7265/780=9.31) winning 9.3 cases per day.

I would think it is likely that the 7265 is total cases in his lifetime, and the unbeaten part only applies to his 3 years in Middlesex DA's office, which is still quite amazing.

If you come up with other info, I'm still interested. 8)
If not...thanx for looking.

[zann725]

81. Then that means he's NOT given up on the BCCI gang (now Bushco) yet!

n/t

[Chi]

94. I hope not..

If someone doesn't recount all of Ohio, I think I'll just spontaneously explode.
There will be no justice left in the universe.

[ginnyinWI]

84. as far as the number of cases--

This is from the Boston Globe:

<<State records for the period show a sharp dropoff in the criminal caseload of every county of the state, led by Middlesex, which was helped by a $250,000 federal grant. The precise figure could not be determined from official reports, however. But they show the entire superior court caseload, including backlog, never exceeded 7,265 during Kerry's tenure.

Kerry said he isn't sure where his figures came from but recalled a concerted effort to clean up a mess. "We adjudicated a number of them, we had to dismiss a whole bunch for lack of evidence, lack of witnesses, people had moved or didn't want to testify," he said. "We went through every case." >>

And the quote you have about "I never lost a case in Middlesex" is as much as I can document on that, too, so far.

The overall point, as it applies to the original thread, is that Kerry was the type of lawyer to never go to trial without a solid case, and that would apply to the election, too. He would never have gotten up and just complained about it, without having solid proof in hand.

[Chi]

93. OK...now that makes sense to me...

Thank you for your time, I hope it wasn't a bother.

The part about cleaning up a back log by adjudicating a 'whole bunch' makes the number of cases easier to swallow.
If he adjudicated 4000 cases, well that's 4000 cases without a loss.
I'm not saying there is anything wrong with that, ya gotta do what ya gotta do. That was a hell of a back log to clean up.

Thanx again for the info.

[ginnyinWI]

87. the person gave me their source:

On the number of cases Kerry dealt with during his time as Asst. DA:

<<<...And the imformation can be found on page 174 in the book "The Complete Biography By The Boston Globe Reporters Who Knew Him Best" in the chapter called Decade in Exile.>>>

[angrydemocrat]

90. Here More Info

I wrote this essay and all the information came from the book called "John F. Kerry - The Complete Biography By The Boston Globe Reporters That Knew Him Best" The chapter called Decade in Exile so you can verify the info for yourself.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=273x1208

[Chi]

95. Thanks!

Heya angrydem <waves>
I hope you know I wasn't challenging you or Ginny on this.

I just was curious cause the number was so high.....and getting there without a loss is amazing.
It certainly easier to swallow now (re:post 93).

Thanks for the info. 8)

[angrydemocrat]

96. Oh No

Totally understandable. I do a lot of essays like this one so I make sure I keep the sources of where my information comes from in case anyone does want to check it out for themselves.

[PaganPreacher]

99. He neither tried, nor won, that many cases.

Your link describes exactly one case that Kerry took to trial as a prosecutor. Commonwealth v. Edgerly

At no point did that article say that Kerry tried or won over 7000 cases. It did say, though, that the entire caseload, including the backlog, in Middlesex County was (drumroll) 7,265 cases. That would include cases pending, plea bargains, dismissals, losses, and cases transferred to other courts.

Kerry boasted that he had cleared 11,000 cases, but that number was 3,735 greater than the entire caseload for the Middlesex County Prosecutor's Office during his time there (plus the cases that were backlogged when he left.) It was at that time that he earned the nickname, "Live Shot."

The Pagan Preacher
I don't turn the other cheek.

[bunny planet]

24. Great news. Thanks Will.

NGU

[ailsagirl]

25. Yet again, we thank you Will

This is great news!!

:toast:

[wisteria]

26. Thank you so much for keeping me informed about this situation!!!

[LeahD]

27. Glad they're not letting "Ohio" fade away. n/t

[KaliTracy]

29. thanks for posting this! n/t

[Pooka Fey]

30. Whew. This is a relief. n/t

[flyarm]

31. thanks so much for the info will!! n/t

[Carolab]

33. I can't f'ing believe it! This is GREAT!!!! n/t

[zann725]

34. '...just when Shrubco thought it was safe to go back into the water!'

Thanks Will! What good news!

Kudos to the attorneys working on this! Tireless and brave!

[loudsue]

38. I, too, am a little concerned about what's going on on the ground in Ohio

There has been WAY ample time for the crooks to compromise the programming of the previously compromised central tabulators and voting machines. And just think of all the paper ballots that have surely been "audited" by republican activist thugs.

I am VERY glad that the 2-Johns are in on this, but it seems to me the forensic evidence is getting away, or has already gotten away.

I'm also curious as to what's still happening in all of the other states that bush stole with his slimey army of thugs.

:kick::kick::kick:

[fooj]

41. Well, I'll be damned! YIPPEE!!! Thanks for the lift...

[parsifal_e]

43. great news! , there is hope yet.

[Wilms]

45. kick n/t

[Nothing Without Hope]

46. What happens if the recount is finally done and Kerry is the winner?

The votes have been "certified" and the blivet** cartel is entrenched with Rethug-majority congress and judicial pals.

What will happen? What CAN happen?

[Peace Patriot]

61. "What CAN happen?"

Well, I think these K/E legal actions are, a) looking forward to '06 and '08, not back to '04 (putting the BushCons on notice about the NEXT fraud they try to pull, and trying to get some rulings and evidence in place to stop them), and b) possibly also meant to undermine the phony "mandate" that the Bush Cartel claimed (as well as gain some Brownie points for the Dems with the grass roots, and maybe assist grass roots efforts at election reform).

Unfortunately, Congress constitutionally holds almost total power over who becomes president. If I read the Constitution right, they can even ignore who people voted for (if there is sufficient controversy about the states' electors) and choose someone who didn't even run. So, no court ruling--not even Sup. Ct.--can overturn Congress' decision on Jan. 6. (And Sup. Ct. should never have ruled as they did in '00. If their decision had gone the other way--FOR Gore, and upholding FLA law--Congress could have intervened and thrown it to Bush, when it got to Congress. That's why Sup. Ct. said B v G was not a precedent. They were on paper thin ice--a one time, unique ruling to install the Bush Cartel, which the Democrats in Congress very unfortunately decided not to challenge.)(They had the votes at that time.)

The Constitution does not make provision for BOTH a president and Congress itself having been chosen illegitimately. It could not have anticipated electronic voting--nor Roman Empire II, with so much power and money at issue (although the Founders tried their damnedest on the latter).

In all justice, Congress should never have accepted the Ohio electors. There were massive violations of the Voting Rights Act, and huge indications of fraud. And if someone could have done it, FLA and some other states should have been challenged on those grounds as well. Also, there was a quite early UC Berkeley study on electronic fraud in FLA, and the exit poll stuff came out and was being published within a few weeks of the election (Dr. Steven Freeman, Jonathan Simon and others). All of this SHOULD HAVE BEEN looked into.

But there was, is and never will be justice in this Congress. The BushCon majority was illegitimately obtained--by electronic and other fraud in '00, '02 and '04. They are lockstep Pod People for Bush. I listened carefully to them all during the Rice and Gonzales debates, and I did not hear a single independent thought from any Republican in the entire debate--what a sorry ass political party it has become!

This is what K/E is up against--and what they WERE up against on 11/3. Not a chance in hell that Congress would give them justice. They could have had a hundred "smoking guns" and it would have made no difference whatsoever (and, in fact, they had more than one at the time--Blackwell's actions, the "terrorist" lockdown, the touchscreens programmed to change votes to Bush). I think they and the DNC bear some blame for not screaming bloody murder over Wally O'Dell and HF Ahmanson gaining control of our election system--and for their support of the Iraq war--but that's a separate discussion. We're talking about what their legal actions might be aimed at NOW. Overturning the election is not possible, nor is impeachment possible with these illegitimately elected Pod People in charge.

[Nothing Without Hope]

72. Thank you for this full and thoughtful answer. Let's add BLACKWELL!

It is perhaps petty of me in view of the huge corruption and the loss of democracy, but I would like to add to the list if possible:
Indicting and convicting Blackwell for his crimes in promoting and abetting the fraud and then interfering and blocking lawful investigations afterward.

Not only would this be a small triumph of justice over the corrupt and illegitimate neocon machine, it would also send a message to other would-be Blackwells who seek to climb the ladder to political favoritism by deliberately promoting corruption of the democratic process. If the blivet** cartel is the only boss that needs to be pleased, then there will be plenty of petty criminals like Blackwell to lick their boots and promote their crimes everywhere. Blackwell himself is busily planning on converting his contribution to the coup d'etat to a guaranteed election as Governor. This MUST be stopped. There MUST be accountability for his crimes. He belongs in prison and in disgrace, not in the state house.

How do you see the chances for this?

[suziedemocrat]

79. Wouldn't the GOP sacrifice Bush to impeachment if fraud was proven?

Wouldn't they have to impeach him to save the party? Is it so bad that they don't even have to PRETEND to care about fair elections? Look how many Democrats turned on Clinton to save their own political skins? If Bush becomes dead weight - won't the GOP cut him loose?

[MissWaverly]

117. taking the heat

Since they have been taking the heat for his social security proposals back in their own districts while he dines on lobster and fine wines with his 80 limos in Europe, they saw the inauguration fiasco, (I particularly like how soldiers were invited to the exclusive balls and were not provided with anything to eat and had to stand for hours - this was George's thank you!), and now the Republican leaders have been jeered at back home. Right now it is becoming painfully clear to them that this administration is an albatross which they will carry in '06. Especially when many republicans are calling Bush's WH-the whore house.

[eaglenetsupport]

112. No doubt about it

A constitutional crisis. We'd be on new ground we've never encountered. Sure would be interesting to watch though.

[kster]

122. Yep I still

hold out hope,that * will have to step down if a recount goes Through,and confirms Kerry won.

Kerry has allot more people watching this time around,the difference between Gore 2000 and Kerry 2004 is the INTERNET.

There may be nothing in the Constitution that makes this scenario play out,so I think it will be done with the power of the people.

[beammeup]

121. The same thing that happened after 2000: nothing.

Of course it's too late to remove him. One may think that, because it would be a huge story ("Bush not legitimately elected"), it would at least raise the awareness of the pathetically ignorant masses. But how would they find out?

After 2000 it was determined that, if all the votes had been counted in Florida, Gore would have been elected. And we know that black votes were disqualified there at a rate 10 times that of white votes. We know that over 6600 Palm Beach 'butterfly' ballots were marked for both Gore and Buchanan and therefore disqualified as overvotes. We know that thousands of uncounted Florida ballots had every candidate selected but Bush (vs. hundreds of anyone-but-Gore ballots). And we know that the official Bush victory margin in that state was under 600 votes.

It's impossible to avoid the conclusion that the 2000 presidential election did not reflect the will of the voters- no conspiracy theory required. Yet, among the mainstream media, where has this story been reported? The Palm Beach Post's articles
http://www.palmbeachpost.com/politics/content/news/election2000/
apparently have not been widely read, since, for example, one of the hosts of C-SPAN's Washington Journal professed ignorance about these conclusions.

Until a free press is restored in this country, facts remain conspiracy theories, and nothing can change. Cancel your subscription to the MSM.

[ClayZ]

47. Thanks for posting! Will the real President please stand up?

And put an end to the HORROR!

We still have our COUNT EVERY VOTE sign up in the yard. Still hoping for the good to overcome.



:kick: :kick:

[Im with Rosey]

48. I hope the Kerry bashers have read this!

I haven't had time to read everything yet, so maybe this is a moot point, does anything address all the sleaze activities? I keep thinking about all those people that stood in line, the woman who went outside for fresh air and wasn't allowed back in. The list goes on and on, as everyone one here knows. How are all those issues being resolved? The red truck with the * sticker, piled high with tons of ballots in it still freaks me out. I want to see the scum exposed and prosecuted! Maybe this is the first step. I have always thought Kerry was investigating quietly and that he was just waiting until he had something concrete to be able to prove. If nothing else, hopefully this will prove to everyone that he is rightfully the MAN.

[ginnyinWI]

85. from what I can tell

these papers that were just filed are complaining about the recount--how it wasn't done right. (?)

[lonestarnot]

49. Interesting for preservation of record...of a fooking cheat! n/t

[Snivi Yllom]

51. What's the point of this?

This is spreading false hope, once again.

It's over, the results will not be changed. Focus on the future.

[abbiehoff]

53. The future will be more stolen elections

unless the truth is revealed.

[kster]

54. "Brown Water" Navy

guys don't spread false hope,the end result may not be exactly what everyone wants,but there will be a result, without a result there will be no future to focus on. GO KERRY! GO DU! GO-GO-GO

[Snivi Yllom]

55. There is a difference between discovering the truth...

...and spreading false hope.

You only need to look at a few of the responses asking, "what if Kerry actually won" to see the false impressions that are created.

[kster]

58. I discovered the

truth about the lottery,the state say's "you can win a million dollars" thanks to TIA I know what my odds are now, but for some reason I keep playing, just because I have hope that I will win. NGU

[Snivi Yllom]

62. There is an actual miniscule chance of winning the lottery

There is absolutely ZERO chance Kerry won the election.

I'll take the lottery.

[kster]

86. I had to

go check things out,so I read around the DU,and most of the people here believe Kerry won the presidency, and also believe that he had the presidency stolen from him by a group of NeoCons disguised as Republicans.I had to make sure I was in the right website

[LittleClarkie]

89. Truth doesn't change depending on whether or not you like the candidate

Do you?

Sometimes I wonder if the folk who are less inclined to believe in the fraud feel this way because they just didn't like the candidate in the first place.

So are you:
a supporter who is not a believer
or a non-supporter non-believer.

I leave out supporter believer for obvious reasons.

[Snivi Yllom]

92. i'll bite

put it this way.

My guy now runs the DNC. But regardless of my candidate, Kerry blew the election bigtime. On par with or worse than Pappy Bush's reelection campaign.

[politicasista]

106. The man is doing something good for a change and you berate him for it.

:mad:

[Im with Rosey]

91. There is also a difference between false hope

and holding those that committed illegal activities responsible. I think we are all aware of the difficulties of changing anything, but that does not mean we just roll over and pretend everything was clean and legal. If there is the slightest chance we can PROVE that * was not legitimately elected, that is enough to denigrate every single thing he tries to pull. I, for one, would like to see him take that last walk a la Nixon, probably not going to happen, but ANYTHING that will diminish him into oblivion will be welcomed.

[Cocoa]

70. it's NOT about changing the results

neither was the challenge in Congress.

It IS about the future.

[Laurab]

75. False hope?

Proving that election fraud took place would be a great thing. It would ensure that it wasn't able to be done again, and possibly the people who allowed it to happen would spend some time in jail, rather than be promoted. It gives me tremendous hope that the truth still may win in the end.

As for focusing on the future - that's exactly what they're doing. It would sure make me feel better about voting if I knew my vote would be counted. That IS the future.

[cestpaspossible]

78. The point is the integrity and reliability of our future elections. nt

[WilliamPitt]

105. This is the point

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=203x334288

[keepthemhonest]

56. thanks Will

I miss the rants here at DU, you have not done one in a while.I guess that was at the climax just before the inauguration.

[kster]

59. Thanks Will........n/t

[Lisabtrucking]

63. This is good news, but worried about the courts, they seem to be

Republicans. Will we ever get justice. I hope so.

[FogerRox]

67. Sun TZU, 1000ad: "when on dangerous ground maneuver--

when on deadly ground , FIGHT!"

In other words--dont fight just to fight--fight at a time and place of your choice. So maneuver yourself into position to win.

Then at the right time--- FIGHT!

GO GO -- Fight Fight-- Win Win

My name is Roger Fox, you can have my civil rights when you pry them from my cold, dead hands.

[kster]

69. You are

right on the mark.

[garybeck]

68. one of the characteristics of FASCISM is use of courts

to subvert people and ideas

if you haven't seen this video, you must:

Fourteen characteristics of Fascism:
http://www.ericblumrich.com/14.html

Mike Malloy does the voice!

[FogerRox]

114. Eric's a NJ Guy, about 15 minutes north of me, Bush Flash.com

[Cocoa]

71. they're both Clinton appointees

what makes them "seem" Republican to you?

[Verve]

82. Thanks Will! Kerry and Edwards have an ulterior motive! They would not

be filing unless there was a reason. Maybe the reason is they want to clean up the election laws before 2006/2008. Maybe they're doing it to keep the pressure on Bush Co. Maybe, they know info. that we do not. But whatever the reason, these filings have a larger motive.

[LittleClarkie]

97. And it sure as hell ain't because Kerry's still trying to win

this is about more than just him now.

Like I said before, the dude's making a souffle.

[intensitymedia]

100. What is the result of this suit if Kerry wins in court? n/t

[WilliamPitt]

103. This

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=203x334288

[Catherine Vincent]

101. Damn! How did I miss this?

Was it reported on the news. Oh wait, nevermind.

[WLKjr]

102. Thanks For The News, I have a question

What does this all mean, where could it go from here. I am dumb when it comes to legal stuff.

[politicasista]

107. Thanks Will

:yourock:

[GetTheRightVote]

113. I am so glad to see they are following up on the election probs

It adds to the truth that is coming out against the repubs and their lies to the American public. I called and left a message as well just to let the Senator and others know we are still watching and appreciating the fact that the fight goes on for the right to vote in our democracy.

:kick:

[politicasista]

119. I hope you're right.

I am still trying to make sense of Kerry's concession, but this is a good step in the right direction. I am sick of all the Kerry bashing that goes on here.

[Coexist]

123. Thanks - glad to see things are still moving along

at the typical pace in our justice system! Please keep us posted. Your reporting is excellent, as always.