Scientific American Could Publish a Detailed Statistical Analysis.
The proof could be as complex and esoteric as necessary. As long as the results are scientific and accurate no one will care. Can you imagine how many magazines they would sell with the lead story like “Statistical Analysis proves that the 2004 Election was Hacked." This could be really embarrassing to the neo-cons. The large papers would be required to weigh in on this and they would not be able to white wash the issue away.
They might also publish a story on the election technology used and its vulnerability to fraud. I am sure that the IT security experts that reviewed the Diebold code would have some fascinating things to say about this.
This might get the momentum going in the right direction without dragging the party through the mud. Kerry will look really noble and Bush will look very bad.
Any respected scientific journal could be substituted.
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion
board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules
page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the
opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent
the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.