Bush Electors who voted on Dec. 13 were NOT officially appointed

[k8conant]

http://www.archives.gov/federal_register/electoral_college/2004_certificates/ascertainment_ohio_01.html

[merh]

1. What am I missing?

How do you know that they were not officially appointed? :shrug:

[fryguy]

2. what is wrong with the form?

other than the strong beleif and likelihood of fraud in the election? what, based on the certificate, makes them not officially appointed?

[bush_is_wacko]

3. Well?

I'm not sure where to figure this out. Can you help with that?

[k8conant]

4. The form doesn't say which of the electors were appointed N/T

[crispini]

5. This is your second thread on this today.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=203x183175

[k8conant]

6. I asked to lock the other one ..

because of attacks.

[Name removed]

7. Deleted message

Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.

[k8conant]

8. WHAT???????????/

[Senator]

9. Just like Florida in 2000...

...the election in Ohio was not conducted fully pursuant to the laws of the state of Ohio.

As in Florida, Ohio law includes a contest provision by which candidates may challenge the official canvass. Unless and until any valid election contest is adjudicated, any appointment of electors is not lawfully justified.

This is why most states do not delay their official certification, as Blackwell chose to do for imagined political advantage (also unlawful).

Like with Florida, they need to violate election law first (suppress votes). Then avoid lawful judicial oversight (or have it truncated by the Felonious Five). And finally make congress complicit in the treason by not disallowing these unlawful electors on Jan 6.

Last time, the DC Dems stood idly by while the Black Caucus stood up to the Anti-American enterprise.

You can help us not let that happen again:

www.thedeanpeople.org

____

[proud_Kucitizen]

10. Great idea

I'm sending one to my representatives in Ohio.