doing anything unless the recount swings the Ohio election to Kerry. Judges aren't in the habit of turning elections away from the candidate who is leading the vote total. Statistical anomalies aren't going to interest the court. We've got to win the recount or it's lights out.
Sure the Ohio election could be challenged in Congress, but even there it's the same thing. They are NOT going to refuse to accept electors for the candidate that has the most votes.
2. That's all true. Courts have been extremely hesitant to step
Edited on Thu Dec-16-04 08:29 AM by righteous1
into this arena. Even in prior elections where there has been blatant and irrefutable evidence of vote stealing ,voter suppresion, and worse they have refrained from overturning results
Bush recieved a certain number of votes which he should not have (and that number is going to have to be well over 100,000) no judge is going to overturn it.
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion
board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules
page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the
opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent
the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.