Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Election 2010: Does it matter if your MP's a local?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » Places » United Kingdom Donate to DU
 
dipsydoodle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-02-10 09:30 AM
Original message
Election 2010: Does it matter if your MP's a local?
Disputes have flared in some areas over hand-picked "London" candidates being selected by political parties to fight seats hundreds of miles away. Does it matter where your MP comes from?

Some selections to replace outgoing MPs - even a few with "open primaries" - have sparked internal party rows if there were no local candidates on the list.

Some felt they were having candidates "parachuted in" on them by the party's HQ.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/election_2010/8619315.stm
Refresh | 0 Recommendations Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
non sociopath skin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-02-10 10:09 AM
Response to Original message
1. That's a matter a) for the parties b) for the individual ....
... I'd have thought.

For some, local knowledge clinches it. For others, it's about experience and skills first.

Yer pays yer taxes and yer makes yer choice ...

The Skin
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
mwooldri Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-02-10 01:08 PM
Response to Original message
2. AFAIK the Lib Dems have always sought input as to who will run for MP in a seat...
Labour have been more open than of years gone by but still HQ can drop in a candidate over the local party. Same with the Tories.

If it is a seat where the party has absolutely no hope of winning then it doesn't matter too much whether you put in a local or a candidate from London, or where-ever... if that particular person wants to be an MP, the general rule of thumb is to run for some no-hope seats and get some experience in before hoping to be selected by a local party in a winnable seat.

My home constituency of Guildford will be one to watch: it was always Conservative until the 2001 election where Sue Doughty took the seat by a small margin for the Lib Dems... and then in 2005 Ann Milton for the Conservatives took it back by an even smaller margin. There's both been boundary changes... so this will be interesting.

This election in Guildford will effectively be a re-run of 2005 - Sue Doughty was re-selected for the Lib Dems, Anne Milton of course is the incumbent. As for "locality" - Anne is more "local" since she was born and raised in the South, Sue though came from "up North". But in 2005 Sue fought on the fact that she actually lived in the constituency, Anne at that time did not. As much as I like Sue, I somehow think that Anne will retain the seat for the Tories (booo!!!) because she was very vocal when the government made a lot of plans to close some local hospitals... Sue was in support of re-developing a now rarely used airfield into affordable sustainable housing for the growing population - lot of NIMBYs not happy about that so there will be some hostility towards Sue for that.



Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
fedsron2us Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-02-10 03:49 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. I can remember when the Tories could have stood a donkey in Guildford
and got it elected. Indeed, while David Howell was their MP, I believe they did.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
craigmatic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-02-10 07:25 PM
Response to Original message
4. As an American I don't see why they don't go the extra mile and give the constituency
the common courtesy of picking a local. Who else would know the local issues better than someone who lives there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Nihil Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-04-10 06:38 AM
Response to Reply #4
8. Too much risk of losing central office control over MPs.
The last thing you need in a democracy is the representatives of the
people acting on behalf of their people instead of just being a
brain-dead clone that votes as directed by "the party".

(Anyone who needs a graphic icon to qualify the above needs more
exposure to the British ...)


"When in that House MP’s divide,
If they’ve a brain and cerebellum too,
They’ve got to leave that brain outside,
And vote just how their leaders tell ’em to."
("Iolanthe" - G&S)
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
LeftishBrit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-03-10 11:34 AM
Response to Original message
5. All things being equal...
I'd prefer the local person, as they may know more about local issues. However, people from outside can too, if they do their homework. It's something that might influence me if all other issues were kept constant, but competence and policies are more important to me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
T_i_B Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-04-10 02:06 AM
Response to Original message
6. A local candidate is a definite advantage.
It's also important IMHO for a candidate to have a genuine love for the place and the people they wish to represent.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Jeneral2885 Donating Member (598 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-04-10 02:55 AM
Response to Original message
7. I thought
that all PPCs must have lived in that area before standing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
muriel_volestrangler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-04-10 02:13 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. No, there's no requirement at all
It's even possible to stand for election in more than one seat at the same time (Lord Sutch did, I think).
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
BolivarianHero Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-04-10 09:44 AM
Response to Original message
9. Absolutely...
Blair routinely used neo-lib hacks from London (under the guise of feminism in his all-woman shortlists) to keep leftist dissidents (i.e. people who should be running for a social democratic party) from getting elected.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 04:29 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Places » United Kingdom Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC