Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login

Why did Feingold vote no on the water bill??

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Places » Wisconsin Donate to DU
a kennedy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-08-07 04:44 PM
Original message
Why did Feingold vote no on the water bill??
he was one of 2 dems that voted no, not sure who the other one was.....why did he vote no??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
a kennedy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-08-07 04:49 PM
Response to Original message
1. the answer is here:
Statement of U.S. Senator Russ Feingold
In Opposition to Overriding the Presidents Veto of the Water Resources Development Act

November 8, 2007

MR. FEINGOLD. Mr. President, I will vote to sustain President Bushs veto of the Water Resources Development Act. The Presidents veto of the WRDA bill is a welcome opportunity for Congress to modify the flawed, bloated bill. Instead of overriding the veto, Congress should be taking this opportunity to fix the bill.

For seven years, I have worked with Senator McCain and many of our colleagues to achieve essential reforms of the Corps of Engineers, and have long anticipated the day that meaningful reforms are enacted. Unfortunately, during conference, the Senates strong Corps reform provisions were significantly watered down. Instead of the reform bill that the country needs, this bill is simply the latest example of business as usual.

After a decade of government and independent reports calling for reforming the Corps, and pointing out stunning flaws in Corps projects and project studies, and after the tragic failures of New Orleans levees during Hurricane Katrina, the American people deserve meaningful reforms to ensure that the projects the Corps builds are safe, appropriate, environmentally responsible and fiscally sound. The urgency and necessity could not be clearer.

A critical component of reforming the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers is ensuring independent review of significant Corps projects. This bill provides review but does not ensure it is truly independent.

I will continue to push for Corps reforms that ensure fiscal responsibility, accountability, public safety, and environmental protections. This means ensuring that Americans tax dollars are spent on the most important priorities, not just on members pet projects. Earlier this year, I was joined by Senators McCain, Coburn, Carper, Gregg, Sununu, and DeMint in offering an amendment to form a commission of non-federal, water resources experts to provide Congress recommendations on a process for prioritizing Corps projects.

Complete answer is here:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
tanglefoot Donating Member (176 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-08-07 06:45 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Well, the man can make a compelling point, can't he? nt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Dec 11th 2017, 10:20 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]

Home » Discuss » Places » Wisconsin Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC