Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Deep-six coroner secrecy bill

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Places » Ohio Donate to DU
 
slaveplanet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-12-05 05:21 AM
Original message
Deep-six coroner secrecy bill

Tuesday, June 07, 2005
Autopsy photos are public property in Ohio. The same goes for a county coro ner's notes, detailed descriptions of autopsies and most any other information the coroner records.

State law has allowed coroners to exempt photos and other records of the deceased only in the case of a continuing criminal investigation or to shield certain medical or psychiatric records.

It's a sound public records law that has allowed the press or other investigators to probe unlawful or suspicious deaths at the hands of law-enforcement officials or others. It has also allowed the public to monitor its coroners.


Now a bill is making its way through the Ohio House of Representatives that would kill off significant public access to the coroners' records. Not only is it an insult to the right of the public to monitor the work of an important elected official, but it also sets an indefensible precedent for secrecy in the workings of a countywide office.
The autopsy bill should be defeated. If the measure clears the legislature, Gov. Bob Taft should lay it to rest with a veto.

http://www.cleveland.com/editorials/plaindealer/index.ssf?/base/opinion/1118136865257600.xml&coll=2

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ClintonTyree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-12-05 05:43 AM
Response to Original message
1. Secrecy is the key for them.....
it's the key to the entire neo-con agenda. It's starting to resemble old Soviet style government, where nothing was the people's business, just State business. Welcome to bushamerika!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lady President Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-12-05 12:18 PM
Response to Original message
2. 5 years ago...
Just 5 years ago I probably would have supported this bill. I would have felt that deceased and their family deserved privacy in death. I've read more autopsies and death certificates than anyone I know because I used to defended product liability and insurance claims. There are no secrets in an autopsy-- details about weight, hair pieces, and genital descriptions. It still upsets me that there are websites where voyeurs can read autopsies. Most people are nosy, rather than monitoring their elected officials.

Now, I'm not sure. I'm so afraid that our government will hide evidence of a wrongfully death that I think we need to sacrifice the deceased dignity. Anyway you look at it, it's very sad.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 10:54 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Places » Ohio Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC