Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login

Federal judge rules Friant Dam near Fresno violates California law

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Places » California Donate to DU
Kadie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-27-04 10:41 PM
Original message
Federal judge rules Friant Dam near Fresno violates California law
Federal judge rules Friant Dam near Fresno violates California law

By TERENCE CHEA, Associated Press Writer

Last Updated: August 27, 2004, 06:40:21 PM PDT

SAN FRANCISCO (AP) - A federal judge ruled Friday that the U.S. government violated California law when it built the Friant Dam near Fresno six decades ago, a decision that could settle a 16-year-old water dispute and restore water flows to the state's second longest river.

The U.S. District Court judge in Sacramento decided in favor of environmentalists who sued the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation and the Friant Water Users Authority in 1988 over the Friant Dam on the San Joaquin River. In the lawsuit, the Natural Resources Defense Council and other environmental groups charged that the defendants violated state law by failing to release enough water to sustain the surrounding environment and wildlife.

Agreeing with the environmentalists Friday, Judge Lawrence K. Karlton wrote, "There can be no genuine dispute that many miles of the San Joaquin River are now entirely dry, except during extremely wet periods, and that the historic fish populations have been destroyed."

The San Joaquin River supported thousands of spawning Chinook salmon and other fish before the Bureau of Reclamation built the Friant Dam, about 20 miles northeast of Fresno, in the 1940s. The water now collects in Millerton Lake and provides irrigation to about 15,000 farmers and one million acres of farmland east of the river. But the dam diverts so much water that long stretches of the river run completely dry most of the year.

Environmentalists argued that the river could be restored without hurting the region's farm economy, while opponents claimed restoring the river for salmon would take water away from farmers and residents.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top

Home » Discuss » Places » California Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC