Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

does anyone really believe this clark pledge?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
bearfartinthewoods Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-04 07:53 AM
Original message
does anyone really believe this clark pledge?
Edited on Sat Jan-10-04 08:22 AM by bearfartinthewoods
"Nothing is going to hurt this country - not bioweapons, not a nuclear weapon, not a terrorist strike - there is nothing that can hurt us if we stay united and move together and have a vision for moving to the future the right way."

to me, this is just magical thinking. there are things that can be done to improve our security but how does clark intend on keeping someone from smuggling in a four ounce paket of ricin and killing thousands...

edited to add link
http://concordmonitor.com/stories/front2004/clark010904_2004.shtml
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
bearfartinthewoods Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-04 07:54 AM
Response to Original message
1. this earns the coverted 'farter's bullshit of the month' award.... n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Crunchy Frog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-04 08:29 AM
Response to Reply #1
14. So bearfart,
which of the two leading candidates do you dislike the most. I'm just asking out of curiosity. If you were forced to choose between the two which one would you pick? Or would you just stay home for the primaries and see how the cards fall. At any rate, it looks like one way or another you are going to be pretty dissappointed with the party nominee.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bearfartinthewoods Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-04 08:46 AM
Response to Reply #14
17. that's a damn good question and i'm working on an answer.
serial liars don't sit well with me but neither do mysterious ex military guys with superman complexes. it's a toughie.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jujube2 Donating Member (81 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-04 11:13 AM
Response to Reply #17
25. I've been thinking we should choose a candidate who's been around
so we know where he's been.

These dark horse types who come out of nowhere make me very nervous.
We should go with one of these established three:

Kerry, Gephardt, Lieberman.

I'm looking at Kerry right now.
But I'm also found of Gephardt.

These are our national party leaders.
Doesn't it make more sense to choose one of them to lead our party nationally then?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jujube2 Donating Member (81 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-04 07:58 AM
Response to Original message
2. He may mean it in his heart, but he should know its impossible in his head
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bearfartinthewoods Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-04 08:01 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. so why say it? it's embarassing. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tedoll78 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-04 07:59 AM
Response to Original message
3. Hmm..
sounds idealistic. I get the jist of what he's trying to say, but preventing terror largely depends on luck too. We can implement as many measures as we want, but humans are a really cunning bunch of animals. If someone wants to infiltrate and poison a water supply, for example, he/she will devise a way to do it.

I'd like to see a candidate come out once and admit that luck is a huge factor. Imagine the media's reaction to that!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ArkDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-12-04 01:42 PM
Response to Reply #3
36. Yeah.
Vote for me, I'm lucky!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
deminflorida Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-04 08:02 AM
Response to Original message
5. What he's saying is true......
Edited on Sat Jan-10-04 08:03 AM by deminflorida
Yes a terrorist attack hurts us, but I could never destroy the idea of America, where all people, from all faiths, and all religions come together. Only we can do that by reacting to such attacks in such a manner that we become a closed society.


"With malice toward none, with charity for all, with firmness in the right as God gives us to see the right, let us strive on to finish the work we are in; to bind up the nation's wounds; to care for him who shall have borne the battle, and for his widow and his orphan - to do all which may achieve and cherish a just and lasting peace, among ourselves, and with all nations."

Abraham Lincoln, March 4, 1865, From His Second Inaugural Address
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jujube2 Donating Member (81 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-04 08:03 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. How is this any different than what Bush is already offering? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
deminflorida Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-04 08:16 AM
Response to Reply #6
10. Excuse me but Bush has done more to divide the nation and the
world after 911 then anyone else.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jujube2 Donating Member (81 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-04 08:20 AM
Response to Reply #10
12. but your mental gymnastic explaination of Clark's meaning
does not detail any plan of Clark's that differs from what is being done now. And I would venture to say that America will stand together in the face of a foreign threat regardless of who the president is, as we did on 9/11.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
papau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-04 08:55 AM
Response to Reply #6
18. true - Clinton's attention worked to control terrorism - Bush failed
Clark has a good point

We should not let Bush buy back credibility with the lives of 500 servicemen and women,
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bearfartinthewoods Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-04 12:17 PM
Response to Reply #18
30. careful with that approach or have you forgotten
the first attack on the twin towers and the Cole?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OKNancy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-04 08:06 AM
Response to Original message
7. You are focusing too much on the first part
The key is...if we stay united and move together, etc. Even if those things happen, if we have a united front and have vision, those things can't hurt us. If the US had not gone half crazy after 911, we wouldn't be in the mess we are right now in Iraq. There wouldn't be "terra,terra,terra" all the time.

From listening to Clark, you get the impression that he is trying to be uplifting and hopeful about the future. You have to admit that there is a black cloud over us and yelling terra terra is hurting us in more ways than one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bearfartinthewoods Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-04 08:18 AM
Response to Reply #7
11. here is another quote from the article that seems to counter your view.
"If I'm president of the United States, I'm going to take care of the American people," Clark said in a meeting with the Monitor editorial board. "We are not going to have one of these incidents."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onehandle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-04 08:07 AM
Response to Original message
8. How out of context.
Anyone reading this should read a fair posting of the LINKED article...

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_topic&forum=132&topic_id=90135
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maddezmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-04 08:12 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. who needs context?
just kidding, thanks for posting. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bearfartinthewoods Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-04 08:22 AM
Response to Reply #8
13. i am sorry...i totally missed that i forgot the link
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Democrats unite Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-04 08:29 AM
Response to Original message
15. It's funny how you can read something out of context...
What about this part?

"Clark reaffirmed his belief that taking appropriate measures would keep America safe.

"I think it could have been prevented," he said of the Sept. 11 attacks. "I think it can be prevented again if we have the right leadership. That's me. I will protect America."

It's funny how thins sounds in snips against when reading the whole article.

Just my 2 cents.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bearfartinthewoods Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-04 08:41 AM
Response to Reply #15
16. i don't care what steps he will take...
no ..i take that back. i do care what steps he'd take that would guarantee that there would be no more of these incidents as he has guaranteed.

got plans?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PatrioticOhioLiberal Donating Member (456 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-04 09:10 AM
Response to Original message
19. What this reminded me of
when I first saw it was Roosevelt's, "We have nothing to fear but fear itself."

Was that what Wes was saying? I don't know, but that's the gist of what I got from it.

Can anyone "guarantee" nothing will ever happen to us? No.

But can someone guarantee keeping it from happening will be the main focus? Yes.

And I think that someone with a working knowledge of the world (not just the "world" of Texas & big money privelege) is better positioned to make that focus work.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bearfartinthewoods Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-04 09:28 AM
Response to Reply #19
20. did you catch this part?
"We are not going to have one of these incidents."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PatrioticOhioLiberal Donating Member (456 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-04 11:39 AM
Response to Reply #20
28. Yep
I "caught" it...but I don't intend to base my vote on it.

I personally think Wes is the best equipped to keep it from happening.

Was it an overstatement? Yep.

But I believe it more coming from him than coming from Bushytushy...who is "never going to forget the lessons from 9/11". Let's see...lessons from 9/11...fastest way to pay off your cronies...go to war.

Sorry...this is not a make or break deal for me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GoBlue Donating Member (930 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-04 09:32 AM
Response to Original message
21. Sorry General Clark but you are deluded
I don't mean to denigrate the 9/11 attacks because for the victims and survivors their freedom was truly denied. But the worst part is, those attacks have resulted in the US doing more harm to the world than the attacks themselves ever did.

Which goes to prove how successful 9/11 was from the terrorists point of view. They didn't attack us because they hate freedom. They attacked us because they love our TERROR. And as a nation we proved their love is true.
_____________________________________________

General, the horse is out of the barn. There is no point in pretending otherwise.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lefty48197 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-04 10:59 AM
Response to Original message
22. Maybe Clark will shut down the NRA magazines
and eliminate all their classified ads that give recipes for bomb making.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasSissy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-04 11:01 AM
Response to Original message
23. Keeping ricin out? I guess the same way it's being done now.
No ricin yet here in Texas.

But if Bush widens the immigrant doors like he wants, we'll have more of a problem.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gulliver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-04 11:02 AM
Response to Original message
24. Of course.
"Nothing is going to hurt this country - not bioweapons, not a nuclear weapon, not a terrorist strike - there is nothing that can hurt us if we stay united and move together and have a vision for moving to the future the right way."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
retyred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-04 11:25 AM
Response to Original message
26. I could answer this better
if you could explain just why it is you don't believe this about America or it's people.


retyred in fla
“Good-Night Paul, Wherever You Are”

So I read this book
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bearfartinthewoods Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-12-04 07:54 AM
Response to Reply #26
32. as much as i admire the American spirit, the idea that a nuke
would not hurt us is assinine.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
boxster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-04 11:34 AM
Response to Original message
27. So, let me make sure I understand this. We as Democrats blast Bush
for not preventing 9/11 and jump on every news story that says it was preventable, but when a Democratic candidate for President says that he can prevent a future one, we say he's delusional?

Sorry, but I see an enormous double standard here. Many, many DU posters have blasted Bush for not preventing 9/11. If Bush could have done it, shouldn't Clark be able to? Especially since he obviously gives a shit about this country, while Bush's only concern is world domination and money accumulation for himself and his buddies.

With the amount of money we spend on defense and intelligence, expecting to keep us RELATIVELY safe shouldn't be a pipe dream. If there's no hope in even trying to prevent them, why bother?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xultar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-04 11:43 AM
Response to Reply #27
29. Logic, Ahhhh, logic...n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fleshdancer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-04 12:26 PM
Response to Original message
31. I don't have to believe it...I just want Bush to say it isn't possible
This is a good move by Clark but the other Democratic candidates have to back him up by not denying his charge. If the other candidates, if asked, challenge Bush to respond to Clark's assertion, then we all win.

Hannity already said the obvious last night. "No one can make this sort of claim". Well if Bush can't make this claim either, then why vote for him? If Americans don't believe that Bush will keep us any safer than a Democratic candidate, then he's toast.

This was very smart of Clark.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lib 4 all Donating Member (209 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-12-04 08:39 AM
Response to Original message
33. don't buy it
myself
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bowens43 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-12-04 08:58 AM
Response to Original message
34. No,, but then
if it was 11:00 PM eastern time and Clark said it was dark outside I'd have to look out the window for confirmation. I haven't believed a thing Clark has said since he claim to be a Democrat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Capn Sunshine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-12-04 01:39 PM
Response to Original message
35. We don't NEED to smuggle ricin
There are Castor trees everywhere in this country.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 05:34 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC