Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Roger Ebert column: The anger of the festering fringe

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
mucifer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-04-09 01:36 PM
Original message
Roger Ebert column: The anger of the festering fringe
By
Roger Ebert
on October 1, 2009 2:06 PM


I've had these thoughts for some time, but have been reluctant to express them. Now so many others have voiced them that it's pointless to remain silent. I am frightened by the climate of insane anti-Obama hatred in this country. I'm not referring to traditional conservatives or Republicans. They're part of the process. I'm speaking of the lunatic fringe, the frothers, the extremist rabble who are sweeping up the ignorant and credulous into a bewildering and fearsome tide of reckless rhetoric.

There have always been nuts. Remember when the John Birch society thought Kennedy was a communist? In those innocent days most of the American people were reasonable. They'd shake their heads in wonder at such a weird notion. Kennedy might be one of those liberals, but he wasn't a commie. And when people said Johnson murdered Kennedy? Also ridiculous. But slowly, ominously, things began to change. After his death, it was said that Edward Kennedy was a Soviet agent. These theories have rabid subscribers.

Obama is a Muslim. Obama was born in Kenya. Obama was a terrorist. Obama will destroy Medicare. Obama will kill your grandmother. Obama is a racist. Obama wants atheism taught in the schools. Obama wants us to pay for the health care of illegal immigrants.

These beliefs are held by various segments of our population. They are absurd. Any intelligent person can see they are absurd. It is not my purpose here to debate them, because such debates are futile. With the zealous True Believers there is no debating. They feed upon loops within loops of paranoid surmises, inventions which are passed along as fact. Sometimes those citing them don't even seem to care if you believe them. Sometimes they may not believe them themselves. The purpose is to fan irrational hatred against our president.


What are we to make of the recent suggestion on the "respected" right-wing site NewsMax, later withdrawn, that "it might not be such a bad thing" if the U. S. military rose up and overthrew Obama in a coup? That sort of talk belongs on a password-protected neo-Nazi or Klan site, not in a place where ostensibly intelligent people look for information. Where were the editors? What did they think? If they're "conservatives," do they support the overthrow of our government by a coup? ...

more at: http://blogs.suntimes.com/ebert/2009/10/the_anger_of_the_festering_fri.html
If you read the comments to his blog, Ebert responds to many of them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Laf.La.Dem. Donating Member (924 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-04-09 01:41 PM
Response to Original message
1. Thank you Roger
"ostensibly intelligent people" - the key word is OSTENSIBLY :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tabasco Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-04-09 01:48 PM
Response to Original message
2. Very smart and very kind and generous man.
They don't get much better than Roger.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
asjr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-04-09 01:56 PM
Response to Original message
3. Ebert read my mind. I was unable to
put it in words. Ebert did it for me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pretzel4gore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-04-09 02:26 PM
Response to Original message
4. but rog, that's the game (winning)..
surely it's obvious the rage is not really on the fringes- it's in the mainstream, on the left. But! By PRETENDING it's 'over there' we avoid confronting the facts blah blah blah. Neat, eh? Take marijuwwanna legalisation. The pig knows there's nothing stopping the legalising of pot; probably 80 percent of the people would go along (with 50 perecent saying 'about fukkin time!') including, especially the rightwingers....so how does mr pig PREVENT the very idea from getting onto the national agenda, or into debate? Since legalised marijuanna would bring down their house of cards?...Voila!! By attacking tobacco, BIG TOBACCO, evil corporate criminal tobacco companies, and the nasty people who sell tobacco, and all the terrible costs of addiction and soon! Gettit? OMFG! (they say) Neat, eh?
So Roger, the extremism on the fringes aint an issue (in Argentina in early 80's, the 'liberal' easy going, looking-forward classes thought law provided a framework, but not after chopper loads of their teenagers were taken out to sea for headshots and dumping etc)
The real extremists are the cops...
giggitey
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lancer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-04-09 03:09 PM
Response to Original message
5. There's one major threat Ebert left out...
...and that's the "sex clinics" in schools that are going to whisk away pregnant 13-year-old girls during the school day to a Planned Parenthood abortion clinic (sic) and send them home on the school bus with their parents none the wiser.

Maybe Michelle Bachmann made this ominous prognostication on the House floor after Ebert's deadline.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vidar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-04-09 05:32 PM
Response to Original message
6. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-04-09 09:11 PM
Response to Original message
7. Ebert is a saint, as far as I'm concerned. He is terrific on films but
his social Spidey sense is as attuned as it gets.

Bravo, Mr. Ebert.

Very nicely done.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RepublicanElephant Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-04-09 09:55 PM
Response to Original message
8. two thumbs up, way up! nt
:thumbsup: :thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Enthusiast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-05-09 08:02 AM
Response to Reply #8
12. +1, RE! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kdillard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-05-09 01:12 AM
Response to Original message
9. Wow couldn't have expressed it better myself. K and R.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
boppers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-05-09 03:21 AM
Response to Original message
10. A few hours of great reading.
It's a lot like an epic DU thread combined with an epic FR thread.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
a kennedy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-05-09 07:01 AM
Response to Original message
11. ditto to two huge thumbs up....
:thumbsup: :thumbsup: :patriot:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lorien Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-05-09 01:33 PM
Response to Original message
13. Call themwhat they are; "Hatriots"
I saw the term used recently in a YouTube comment. It fits the lunitic fringe perfectly. After all, when one of them was asked last November about what unites them all they said "we all hate the same things."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LaPera Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-05-09 02:03 PM
Response to Original message
14. Thanks Roger I adore ALL about you and have for many, many years!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 09:33 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC