|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
closeupready (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-22-09 01:20 PM Original message |
I'm sorry but unless Obama is suggesting a way to divest myself of my body, a mandate is a tax. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
yodermon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-22-09 01:23 PM Response to Original message |
1. ..a tax I'd be ok with, PROVIDED there's a Public Option . n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
closeupready (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-22-09 01:25 PM Response to Reply #1 |
3. yes, me. too. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Oregone (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-22-09 02:10 PM Response to Reply #1 |
24. And, uh, what if you wouldn't qualify to use it? What if it was unaffordable unsubsidized? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BlooInBloo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-22-09 03:48 PM Response to Reply #24 |
62. What if it ATE MY BABY!!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cliffordu (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-22-09 08:48 PM Response to Reply #62 |
75. Well.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BlooInBloo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-22-09 09:33 PM Response to Reply #75 |
76. My error. It was the dingo... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
joeycola (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-23-09 09:26 AM Response to Reply #1 |
86. make that a STRONG public option. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tridim (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-22-09 01:24 PM Response to Original message |
2. Take your pick. Mandate or status-quo. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SteppingRazor (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-22-09 01:26 PM Response to Reply #2 |
4. A mandate without a public option is a giveaway to the insurance industry. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tridim (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-22-09 01:27 PM Response to Reply #4 |
5. The PO was assumed. Sorry about that. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SteppingRazor (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-22-09 01:31 PM Response to Reply #5 |
7. No worries. Although, the way things are going... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Oregone (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-22-09 02:11 PM Response to Reply #2 |
27. Its not a no-brainer at all |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
brentspeak (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-22-09 03:41 PM Response to Reply #2 |
57. Mandate = permanent status quo |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
unpossibles (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-22-09 01:31 PM Response to Original message |
6. and again.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
prolesunited (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-22-09 01:31 PM Response to Original message |
8. And how do you feel about mandatory car insurance? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WinkyDink (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-22-09 01:35 PM Response to Reply #8 |
9. As Obama would say, LOOK. Not every citizen MUST BUY or HAVE CAR INSURANCE. Do you NOT GET |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Demit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-22-09 01:40 PM Response to Reply #8 |
10. You have a choice not to own a car. No car, no need for car insurance. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mvd (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-22-09 01:42 PM Response to Reply #10 |
12. Agreed; I see personal mandates as a "life tax" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
high density (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-22-09 01:47 PM Response to Reply #10 |
14. I'm really lost... Why are we having this argument? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Demit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-22-09 01:56 PM Response to Reply #14 |
19. As I understand it, people are equating the penalty fee for not buying insurance to a tax. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
high density (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-22-09 02:09 PM Original message |
Obama said that certain income levels will be exempted from the mandate |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BREMPRO (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-23-09 10:46 AM Response to Reply #14 |
88. agree with you- there seems to be a libertarian streak coming out here when those without insurance |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
newspeak (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-23-09 12:37 PM Response to Reply #88 |
90. I'd gladly pay for a public option |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BREMPRO (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-23-09 01:06 PM Response to Reply #90 |
92. yah, privatizing the military really worked out well... for a new source of campaign contributions |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
alcibiades_mystery (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-22-09 02:13 PM Response to Reply #10 |
32. If you don't drive a car, you CAN'T produce risk and inflict a social cost on drivers in general |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
closeupready (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-22-09 02:19 PM Response to Reply #32 |
36. As long as we agree that Obama supports taxing the middle class contrary to what he claimed in prima |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
alcibiades_mystery (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-22-09 02:22 PM Response to Reply #36 |
41. Why would I agree to |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
closeupready (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-22-09 02:26 PM Response to Reply #41 |
45. He's supporting a tax on the middle class. He promised we would not be taxed. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
alcibiades_mystery (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-22-09 03:01 PM Response to Reply #45 |
50. So you say |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
closeupready (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-22-09 03:46 PM Response to Reply #50 |
61. In what respect, Charlie. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Oregone (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-22-09 02:21 PM Response to Reply #8 |
39. Ask my children |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ZombieHorde (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-22-09 02:23 PM Response to Reply #8 |
43. I would not like mandatory car insurance. That is a bad idea. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
brentspeak (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-22-09 03:42 PM Response to Reply #8 |
58. Somehow, I doubt you're much interested in "uniting the proles" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bluenorthwest (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-23-09 09:16 AM Response to Reply #8 |
84. Many people do not need to own a car because of -gasp- |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Phx_Dem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-22-09 01:40 PM Response to Original message |
11. If you aren't required to pay it, it's not a tax IMO. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Demit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-22-09 01:46 PM Response to Reply #11 |
13. I guess you are able to afford insurance for your sorry ass. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Phx_Dem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-22-09 01:50 PM Response to Reply #13 |
15. Yes I am. And if I couldn't, I'd receive a subsidy. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
msallied (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-22-09 01:53 PM Response to Reply #15 |
17. Easy, this person would limp into an ER |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mvd (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-22-09 01:55 PM Response to Reply #15 |
18. I'm not so sure subsidies will be enough |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
high density (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-22-09 02:03 PM Response to Reply #18 |
21. I don't think they're a "giveaway" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mvd (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-22-09 02:08 PM Response to Reply #21 |
22. I don't think they will, and they are a boon to private insurance |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
high density (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-22-09 02:11 PM Response to Reply #22 |
26. Mandate -> Health Insurance Exchange -> Public Option |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mvd (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-22-09 02:13 PM Response to Reply #26 |
31. I disagree with him on the taxpayer thing, for one |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Demit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-22-09 02:21 PM Response to Reply #18 |
40. Exactly. The gov't will be using the public as a pass-through. Here's your subsidy; now give it to |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Phx_Dem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-22-09 04:37 PM Response to Reply #40 |
65. Maybe we should wait to see what the plan and subsidies are |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Demit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-22-09 02:48 PM Response to Reply #15 |
49. As it stands now, I won't be able to pay for the ER or treatment. I can only hope I die quickly. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
msallied (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-22-09 01:51 PM Response to Reply #13 |
16. Do you think mandate costs for private ins would the be the same |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Demit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-22-09 02:10 PM Response to Reply #16 |
25. Uh, isn't that what's in Max Baucus' plan? People would have to pay up to 13% of their income? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
closeupready (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-22-09 02:13 PM Response to Reply #25 |
30. $500/month would drive some people into Chapter 7. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Phx_Dem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-22-09 04:37 PM Response to Reply #25 |
66. Fuck the Baucus plan. That shit isn't going to pass as the final, conference-approved |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
closeupready (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-22-09 02:09 PM Response to Reply #11 |
23. Every individual (or someone acting on their behalf) is required to pay for HI. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CJCRANE (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-22-09 01:57 PM Response to Original message |
20. How do you feel about police and firefighting services... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
closeupready (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-22-09 02:12 PM Response to Reply #20 |
28. Should they be optional? In some parts of the US, they ARE optional. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
vaberella (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-22-09 02:22 PM Response to Reply #28 |
42. Optional in what way?! What State or Town?! Give me some examples here. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
closeupready (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-22-09 02:39 PM Response to Reply #42 |
48. Monett, Missouri. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
vaberella (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-22-09 03:20 PM Response to Reply #48 |
51. In what way are they optional? They have 2 fire stations and a police department. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
closeupready (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-22-09 03:45 PM Response to Reply #51 |
59. The case where that guy's garage was on fire, but he had failed to pay |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
vaberella (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-24-09 04:51 AM Response to Reply #59 |
95. It currently looks like it's provided by the State. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Oregone (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-22-09 02:13 PM Response to Reply #20 |
29. Tax funded public service....hows that compare at all? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
uponit7771 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-22-09 02:16 PM Response to Reply #20 |
34. Only if they want me to pay 15% of my income towards it while other countries pay half that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mvd (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-22-09 02:19 PM Response to Reply #34 |
37. It's true that covering the costs needs to come from somewhere, but.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
brentspeak (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-22-09 03:38 PM Response to Reply #20 |
54. Multimillionaire insurance company executives put out fires and catch bad guys? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JoePhilly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-22-09 05:29 PM Response to Reply #20 |
71. So if the house next to mine catches fire ... and they don't have "coverage" ... My house is ok???? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
eridani (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-23-09 06:15 AM Response to Reply #20 |
79. The fire department doesn't double your property tax if you have a fire |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
alcibiades_mystery (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-22-09 02:15 PM Response to Original message |
33. Unless you are guaranteeing that your body won't produce social costs |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
damntexdem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-22-09 02:18 PM Response to Original message |
35. A mandate is a prevention of free riding. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
brentspeak (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-22-09 03:40 PM Response to Reply #35 |
55. Is that the new spin? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gravity (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-23-09 12:56 PM Response to Reply #55 |
91. It is true |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
closeupready (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-22-09 02:21 PM Response to Original message |
38. His claim this is not a tax increase is a transparent attempt to not contradict yet another promise |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
vaberella (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-22-09 02:28 PM Response to Reply #38 |
46. Are you thinking? He's requiring you to have insurance. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
closeupready (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-22-09 02:35 PM Response to Reply #46 |
47. To burden Americans with a requirement to have insurance at a COST is to promote a tax increase. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
vaberella (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-22-09 03:25 PM Response to Reply #47 |
52. Actually-----subsidies, medicaid, and possible public option is always there. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
brentspeak (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-22-09 03:45 PM Response to Reply #46 |
60. In other words, it's a TAX |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
vaberella (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-24-09 05:14 AM Response to Reply #60 |
97. Uh..hence the reason for the legislation...hello. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bluenorthwest (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-23-09 09:24 AM Response to Reply #46 |
85. Medicaid is a means tested benefit for those with no Insurance |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
vaberella (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-24-09 05:11 AM Response to Reply #85 |
96. No problem---As the first form of clarity I NEVER said that Medicaid gives charges co-pays. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dave29 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-22-09 02:23 PM Response to Original message |
44. reading this thread is a tax |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
brentspeak (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-22-09 03:35 PM Response to Original message |
53. Many of the responses here -- and the unrecs -- demonstrate how the DLC has taken over GD-P |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Better Believe It (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-22-09 03:40 PM Response to Original message |
56. Should anyone be fined by the gov't for not giving money to the private insurance industry? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
quaker bill (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-22-09 05:28 PM Response to Reply #56 |
70. Should anyone be forced to buy auto insurance |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Better Believe It (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-22-09 08:32 PM Response to Reply #70 |
74. Medical care is not the same as home or car insurance |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
quaker bill (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-23-09 06:10 AM Response to Reply #74 |
78. Personally |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kjackson227 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-23-09 01:35 PM Response to Reply #70 |
93. Thank you. Been there, done that myself... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
earth mom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-22-09 04:25 PM Response to Original message |
63. A tax paid to a PRIVATE company, mind you. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
polichick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-22-09 04:39 PM Response to Reply #63 |
67. Exactly. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Blasphemer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-23-09 01:52 PM Response to Reply #63 |
94. Exactly! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
treestar (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-22-09 04:29 PM Response to Original message |
64. so what? It'd be like any other public benefit |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
brentspeak (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-22-09 05:28 PM Response to Reply #64 |
69. One of the resident DLC shills -- right on time |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ZombieHorde (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-22-09 10:44 PM Response to Reply #64 |
77. I am not so sure we will get health care in return. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
quaker bill (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-22-09 05:21 PM Response to Original message |
68. A tax is a tax |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SoCalDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-22-09 05:36 PM Response to Original message |
72. Here's hoping you never get sick, and need the "kindness of strangers" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
eridani (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-23-09 06:18 AM Response to Reply #72 |
80. Fine. Let health care be a government funded service then |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rmp yellow (136 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-22-09 05:39 PM Response to Original message |
73. Question. If i become unemployed, will I have to get health insurance? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dawgs (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-23-09 08:54 AM Response to Original message |
81. Bullshit, unless you can be sure that your "body" will never need health care. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
closeupready (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-23-09 08:57 AM Response to Reply #81 |
82. Bullshit. A mandate is not going to lower costs. Only single payer can do that. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BREMPRO (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-23-09 10:26 AM Response to Reply #82 |
87. I agree a public option or some form of non-profit option would lower costs, but |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Prophet 451 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-23-09 09:04 AM Response to Original message |
83. Well, yeah |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BREMPRO (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-23-09 10:50 AM Response to Reply #83 |
89. agreed . well said n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Wed Apr 24th 2024, 07:09 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC