Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Huffpo's Robert Borosage: Health Care: Let the Majority Be Heard

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
flpoljunkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-19-09 07:22 AM
Original message
Huffpo's Robert Borosage: Health Care: Let the Majority Be Heard
August 18, 2009 11:08 PM

Health Care: Let the Majority Be Heard
by Robert L. Borosage

The editors of the Wall Street Journal say that the public option in health care reform has been "sent to the death panel." Obama "concedes" the public option, reports the Financial Times. Even liberals seem to agree. The public option is "all but gone," writes Bob Herbert of the New York Times. The American Prospect's Mark Schmitt mourns its "likely death."

Nonsense. There is no reason to exaggerate the strength of the small tong of conservative Democrats and claque of obstructionist Republicans standing in the way of reform. Here's the reality:

Offering a public plan as a choice to compete with the private insurance companies has continued strong support in polling. President Obama favors it. The Democratic leadership in both the House and the Senate support it. More importantly, a majority of legislators in the House and a broad majority of Democrats in the Senate will vote for it. Needless to say, the activist base of the party thinks it vital.

The only question is whether a small minority of Democrats in the Senate will dig themselves into such a rabid fever that they would sabotage health care reform itself to stop the public option. Whether their animus derives from ideology or insurance company contributions, it is inconceivable that a handful of Blue Dogs in the House or conservative Dems in the Senate would block the president's key reform to make their point. It would also be suicidal, for if 1994 is any indication, Democrats -- particularly those from more conservative districts -- will pay a harsh price at the polls in 2010 if they fail to pass reform.

more here...

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/robert-l-borosage/health-care-let-the-major_b_262666.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
dtotire Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-19-09 07:55 AM
Response to Original message
1. Pass A Bill
Bill Maher said on Rachel Maddow's show that when FDR passed Social Security in 1934, It did not include many types of workers: domestics, Government workers, farm workers. In later years, the bill was improved. In the same way, if we pass a bill without a public option, it can be improved at a later date, by negotiating the rates charged by providers, allowing anyone to buy into Medicare, etc. In the meantime, nearly everyone will have coverage, and the poll ratings for Obama will improve, with more chances for success in other areas.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flpoljunkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-19-09 08:00 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Negotiating prices and allowing Medicare buy-in later are more than 'improvements.'
It would be very difficult to add them at a later time--as they are not small changes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truedelphi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-20-09 04:16 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. It was a very different world. And in making his initial Social Security plan simpler,
He was not making it more expensive.

If we keep allowing the Insurers and Big Pharma into the program called "Reform" we automatically make this program 22 to 44% more expensive. I am not willing to keep these crooks at the table, feeding off our health care dollars.

If Obama is willing to assauge the baby killers, I can only wonder what kinda deal they have cut him? (Probably the deal that says - "Sir, we will see to it that you have eight years. We guarantee that you will run against Palin in 2012!)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NecklyTyler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-20-09 05:34 AM
Response to Original message
3. We have the votes, let's pass a bill
The Republicans are irrelevant. By passing a bill this year, we can amend the bill in later years. We have to get something on the books first, and the single payer option will come in the future
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 16th 2024, 03:55 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC