Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Talking point: 95% of Americans are 1 illness away from bankruptcy, even if they have insurance

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Lorax7844 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-21-09 02:28 AM
Original message
Talking point: 95% of Americans are 1 illness away from bankruptcy, even if they have insurance
Edited on Tue Jul-21-09 02:29 AM by Lorax7844
Why every single one of us isn't using this in every debate is beyond me. We need to buck up and get our talking points in order. The fact that 60% of Americans that file for bankruptcy are doing so because of healthcare bears repeating. Over and over and over. We need to be sure what we want, public option containing what? Single payer was the compromise, do not let us lose more ground on this issue.

Get talking folks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
John Q. Citizen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-21-09 02:35 AM
Response to Original message
1. Why? Because Obama wants to make sure we can keep that private insurance. I guess he doesn't care
if we go bankrupt?

See, it's impossible to argue both in favor of and against private insurance at the same time. It's the weakest argument their is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lorax7844 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-21-09 02:41 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. guess so then
guess I'll have to call the White House and ask Obama to quit arguing on behalf of the free market and private insurance. :eyes:

It's an argument for fixing the system instead of doing nothing. You know arguing for reform.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lorax7844 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-21-09 02:42 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Doesn't make the facts any less true
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
John Q. Citizen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-21-09 02:50 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. The free market failed and required socialism to keep it afloat. So you should say that
And ask him why he doesn't get it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lorax7844 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-21-09 02:59 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. Arg, I agree with that, by all means support single payer loud and proud yo.
Edited on Tue Jul-21-09 03:29 AM by Lorax7844
I do, but I also support a public option, IF single payer is off the table. Since the single payer is off the table then I am supporting the strongest public option possible. Our two points do not have to contradict. Your nit-picking makes this all the harder when trying to get the public to understand the issue. In this case we are trying to convince people that the devil they know is fucking evil.

I just want some reform. I voted for Obama because I wanted things to get better. If the public option makes things better then I support that. If single payer is on the table I would support that instead.

I'm also for owning the socialism, seriously when did helping society become a bad thing?




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
John Q. Citizen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-21-09 03:16 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. I never told public option people they were off the table. It was the public option people who told
us we were off the table. (I don't mean you; I mean the big boys in the back room)

I voted for Obama (and canvassed hundreds of doors, gave money, phone called, and organized volunteers) because he said he would listen to all sides of an issue regardless of ideology. Then the first thing he did was shut us out of the process. He didn't have to push or embrace single payer, just allow us a seat at the table like the public option people got, the blue dogs got, the Repos got, and the insurance companies got.

What does public option even mean? The House passed a bill that says about 10 million Americans will be in a public option pool after ten years. That's crap. That's bait and switch.

So I'm not really sure what it is that I'm supposed to be for when people say public option. All I know is I want single payer but i was considered off the table before they even set up the table.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lorax7844 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-21-09 03:22 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. I agree
"The House passed a bill that says about 10 million Americans will be in a public option pool after ten years. That's crap. That's bait and switch."

I agree 100%, if that is what happens. However as an example of the complete and utter failure of what we have now, my talking point is still a good one.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DailyGrind51 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-21-09 11:53 AM
Response to Reply #4
11. Allan Greenspan conceded that the "free market" failed regarding financial markets.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasObserver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-21-09 09:35 AM
Response to Original message
8. Recommend
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
high density Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-21-09 09:36 AM
Response to Original message
9. And you got that fact from... ?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluenorthwest Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-21-09 09:45 AM
Response to Original message
10. What is your talking point about the discrimination in the 'reform'?
Tell me why my family has to be treated as strangers to please religious and other bigots?
Not sure why I'd be expected to support a plan that is discriminatory against me and my loved ones. Not sure why so many Democrats are so very willing to play the prejudice game as long as they get to save a few bucks.
So what's the talking point? How do you explain the discriminatory language away?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DrToast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-21-09 12:00 PM
Response to Original message
12. I heard that 95% of Americans are 1 illness away from bankruptcy, even if they have insurance
How am I doing?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DuaneBidoux Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-21-09 02:00 PM
Response to Original message
13. Another great change would be two track bankruptcy laws: one for illness and one for debt happy...
consumers. I know the debt happy consumer is the minor case but there are people who should not be relieved of their debts as easily as others. Ill people should simply not be held accountable beyond a certain point (and yes change the health care system too).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
asteroid2003QQ47 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-21-09 07:06 PM
Response to Original message
14. And an illness and a half away from the grave! eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LaPera Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-22-09 02:18 AM
Response to Original message
15. Using a conservative definition, 62.1 percent of all bankruptcies in 2007 were medical;
"Only single-payer national health insurance can make universal, comprehensive coverage affordable by saving the hundreds of billions we now waste on insurance overhead and bureaucracy."

"Using a conservative definition, 62.1 percent of all bankruptcies in 2007 were medical; 92 percent of these medical debtors had medical debts over $5,000, or 10 percent of pretax family income," the researchers wrote.

"Most medical debtors were well-educated, owned homes and had middle-class occupations."

The researchers, whose work was paid for by the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, said the share of bankruptcies that could be blamed on medical problems rose by 50 percent from 2001 to 2007.

"Unless you're Warren Buffett, your family is just one serious illness away from bankruptcy," Harvard's Dr. David Himmelstein, an advocate for a single-payer health insurance program for the United States, said in a statement.

"For middle-class Americans, health insurance offers little protection," he added.

http://www.reuters.com/article/newsOne/idU...

"Nationally, a quarter of firms cancel coverage immediately when an employee suffers a disabling illness; another quarter do so within a year," the report reads.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Quantess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-22-09 02:33 AM
Response to Original message
16. Where did you get the 95%? And how ill must they be?
Not every illness is equally as draining.
I know, talking points don't have to be rock-solid to be convincing. I like your talking point but it sounds iffy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lorax7844 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-22-09 04:08 AM
Response to Reply #16
17. sorry i meant serious illness
but it's too late to edit
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
asteroid2003QQ47 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-22-09 05:29 AM
Response to Reply #17
18. You have nothing to be sorry for. Most won't nitpick, keep up...
the good work.
--------------------

“There is still a lot of hard work that we as a country need to do. They can’t look to any one individual, whether it’s Barack or it’s the next new hope that’s going to appear to be that savior. And I would just hate for people to sort of see this potential and think: Oh, now I can rest easy because Barack Obama is going to fix things. It doesn’t work that way.”
--Michelle Obama
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lorax7844 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-22-09 06:13 AM
Response to Reply #18
19. I wish that was true but as a group posters on dem websites are amazing nit-pickers
While incredibly annoying when my posts are nit-picked, it makes our arguments stronger and that always a good thing.

Also thanks Lepera for digging up the quote, saved me the time, and it is most def true.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Quantess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-22-09 03:28 PM
Response to Reply #19
20. I intended it to be constructive criticism.
I'm glad that you saw it that way. :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 04:34 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC