Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Congressional Research Service: Judge Sonia Sotomayor: Analysis of Selected Opinions

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
usregimechange Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-26-09 07:18 PM
Original message
Congressional Research Service: Judge Sonia Sotomayor: Analysis of Selected Opinions
This report provides an analysis of selected opinions authored by Judge Sotomayor during her
tenure as a judge on the Second Circuit. Discussions of the selected opinions are grouped
according to various topics of legal significance...

Overall, Judge Sotomayor’s opinions defy easy categorization along ideological lines...

The First Amendment of the Constitution provides that “Congress shall make no law ... abridging
the freedom of speech, or of the press.... ”4 Judge Sotomayor’s decisions interpreting this clause
do not appear to be considered particularly controversial. To the extent that a pattern can be
discerned, some might point to a meticulous recitation of the facts and her application of
precedent from the Supreme Court or the Second Circuit to those facts.5 Consequently, it does not
appear possible to discern a particular ideology from her opinions or to determine whether she
would favor a more or less expansive application of the Free Speech Clause of the First
Amendment...

An examination of Judge Sotomayor’s opinions provides little guidance as to her judicial
philosophy regarding executive authority in the realm of national security. During her tenure with
the Second Circuit, Judge Sotomayor has heard only a handful of cases concerning national
security matters. As will be discussed later,68 Judge Sotomayor wrote an opinion in 2006 for a
unanimous three-judge panel in Cassidy v. Chertoff, 69 holding that minimally intrusive,
suspicionless searches of passengers’ carry-on baggage and automobile trunks before boarding a
commuter ferry were justified on account of the government’s interest in deterring terrorist
attacks on large vessels involved in mass transportation. Also, as discussed previously,70 Judge
Sotomayor joined a unanimous three-judge opinion in 2008 striking down on First Amendment
grounds two provisions of the USA PATRIOT Act relating to the disclosure of the receipt of
National Security Letters.71 These cases, however, provide little indication as to how Judge
Sotomayor might rule on broader national security issues relating to executive power or the
detention of suspected terrorists...

More:

http://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/R40649.pdf


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC