Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Army orders recall of body armor

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Leo The Cleo Donating Member (352 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-29-09 02:42 PM
Original message
Army orders recall of body armor
http://www.topix.net/content/ap/2009/01/army-orders-recall-of-body-armor-4

Army Secretary Pete Geren has ordered the recall of more than 16,000 sets of body armor following an audit that concluded the bullet-blocking plates in the vests failed testing and may not provide soldiers with adequate protection.

The audit by the office of the Defense Department inspector general, not yet made public but obtained by The Associated Press, faults the Army for flawed testing procedures before awarding a contract for the armor.

In a letter dated Jan. 27 to Acting Inspector General Gordon Heddell, Geren said he did not agree that the plates failed the testing or that soldiers were issued deficient gear. He said his opinion was backed by the Pentagon's top testing director.

Despite his insistence that the armor was not deficient, Geren said he was recalling the sets as a precaution.

Geren also said he's asked for a senior Pentagon official to resolve the disagreement between the Army and the inspector general's office.

'To ensure there can be no question regarding the effectiveness of every soldier's body armor, I have today ordered that the plates at issue be identified and collected until such a time as the matter has been adjudicated by the deputy secretary of defense,' he wrote.

Hundreds of thousands of body armor sets have been manufactured by nearly a dozen different companies over the past seven years. The vests are now standard gear for troops in Iraq and Afghanistan.

The audit by the inspector general's office was the second requested by Rep. Louise Slaughter, D-N.Y. She first asked the watchdog agency to look into the acquisition of the ballistic vests in 2006 after she read newspaper reports saying inadequate body armor was causing U.S. casualties.

The first audit was completed last year, but Slaughter said it wasn't thorough enough.

Slaughter said Wednesday she's satisfied with the latest report but remains concerned the Army has not changed its contracting methods to ensure the troops are getting the best gear.

'I'm not through,' she said. 'I really want to know which contracts are bad.'

Heddell is scheduled to give Slaughter a briefing Thursday on the audit's findings.

Auditors focused on a step called first article testing. These tests are to confirm the product meets the Army's specifications. But the audit says the Army didn't perform or score the tests consistently.

'Consequently, we believe that three of the eight ballistic insert designs that passed first article testing actually failed,' the audit says.

The contract examined by the inspector general's office is listed in the audit only as W91CRB-04-D-0040. An Aug, 20, 2004, an announcement on the Defense Department's Web site states a contract under that designation was awarded to Armor Works of Chandler, Ariz.

The Army bought 51,334 sets of the protective inserts under the contract for just over $57 million, according to the inspector general.

A call to Armor Works was not immediately returned.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
atreides1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-29-09 02:50 PM
Response to Original message
1. I have an idea
Let Geren, his deputy, the officers that work for him, and the heads of Armor Works, be used as test dummies to see if the armor really works.

All that would be needed is a small caliber weapon fired from its maximum range directly at the center of mass.

If Geren feels so strongly that there is nothing wrong with this body armor he should have no problem testing it!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Born_A_Truman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-29-09 03:06 PM
Response to Original message
2. SFTT has been on this body armor for quite awhile
http://www.sftt.org/bodyarmor.html

Lots of information on the link above.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-29-09 04:13 PM
Response to Original message
3. Why not just buy dragon skin and be done with it?
http://www.pinnaclearmor.com/body-armor/dragon-skin.php

They were PUNISHING Marines a few years back for buying and using this stuff intead of the shitty issue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RaleighNCDUer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-29-09 04:33 PM
Response to Original message
4. I do hope they don't collect it before providing replacements.
Edited on Thu Jan-29-09 04:37 PM by RaleighNCDUer
Bad body armor is better than no body armor at all.

EDIT:
Gotta wonder about this:

"She first asked the watchdog agency to look into the acquisition of the ballistic vests in 2006 after she read newspaper reports saying inadequate body armor was causing U.S. casualties."

Inadequate body armor does NOT cause US casualties - it fails to prevent US casualties. Big difference.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 06:23 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC