Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

USNews: Bush's military service in question – again

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
dennis4868 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-14-04 02:25 PM
Original message
USNews: Bush's military service in question – again
http://www.usnews.com/usnews/news/articles/roane040908.htm

I HOPE THIS IS NOT A DUPE. IF IT IS I AM SORRY......GOOD READ!


A new examination of payroll records and other documents released by the White House earlier this year appear to confirm critics' assertions that President George W. Bush failed to fulfill his duty to the Air National Guard during the Vietnam War.



Most of the documents, which have been reviewed by U.S. News, and former military and Defense Department personnel, were released last February, when reporters raised new questions about Bush's service during the Vietnam War. After the release, White House spokesman Scott McClellan said he considered the case closed and noted that, "these records I'm holding here clearly document the president fulfilling his duties in the National Guard."

The White House also included a signed memorandum from the man who headed personnel matters for the Guard during Bush's tenure, certifying the administration's position. President Bush had "completed his military obligation in a satisfactory manner," wrote Albert C. Lloyd Jr., a retired Air Force colonel.

A recent examination of the records by U.S. News does not appear to support Lloyd's conclusions. Among the issues identified by the magazine:

The White House used an inappropriate–and less stringent–Air Force standard in determining that President Bush fulfilled his National Guard duty.
Even using this lesser standard, the president did not attend enough drills to complete his obligation to the Guard during his final year of service.
During the final two years of his service obligation, Bush did not comply with Air Force regulations that impose a time limit on making up missed drills. Instead, he took credit for makeup drills he participated in outside that time frame. Five months of drills missed by the President in 1972 were never made up, contrary to assertions made by the White House.

The White House declined to respond to specific questions submitted by U.S. News last week, but today defended Bush's Guard service. "The president completed the necessary points to qualify for an honorable discharge. He fulfilled his obligation to both the Texas Air National Guard and the Alabama National Guard during his service there," says Claire Buchan, White House spokeswoman. "The president is proud of his service and is pleased to release his records and they confirm that the President served honorably."

For several experts contacted by U.S. News, how President Bush received his honorable discharge from the Guard remains a mystery. Lawrence Korb, a former Assistant Secretary for Defense for Manpower and Reserve Affairs during the Reagan Administration, said it was apparent that President Bush "had not fulfilled his obligation."

"When I look at his records it is clear he didn't do what he was supposed to do," Korb says. "Since he didn't do these those things, he should have been called to active duty."

more here.....http://www.usnews.com/usnews/news/articles/roane040908.htm

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
whistle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-14-04 02:28 PM
Response to Original message
1. Great, thanks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
faithnotgreed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-14-04 02:29 PM
Response to Original message
2. not too late for active duty for bush, right mr korb?
now THAT would be justice
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
A_Possum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-14-04 02:30 PM
Response to Original message
3. This is the important stuff
but all the forgery hoopla has obscured that the actual undisputed records show a guy who blew off his commitment, blew off his country, blew off the war so that other men would fight it for him, blew off flying planes...

none of that is in dispute.

Bush has NO RIGHT to be "proud" of his service. His service was chickenshit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ducks In A Row Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-14-04 02:32 PM
Response to Original message
4. Forgeries!!!! They're all forgeries!
:D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
krkaufman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-14-04 02:35 PM
Response to Original message
5. Here's a more recent USNews article...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
amber dog democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-14-04 02:39 PM
Response to Original message
6. and what is interesting
is the question: why is this even coming up - if he played by the rules ?
Had the Chimp served honerably, no one would have questioned his fulfilling his military committment.

Waving an honorable dishcarge at the press won't fix it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GOPAgainstGW Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-14-04 02:44 PM
Response to Original message
7. Thanks - Great Reads and a Serious Publication with Integrity!
----------------------------------------------------------------
Beltway and Texas Republicans Against Bush-Cheney '04, Inc.
----------------------------------------------------------------

"Insider's News", Vol 1 - Kerry-Edwards Campaign Doing Well
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=132x748458
"Insider's News" Vol 1.1 - Great Anti-Bush Sites
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=132x756409

Kitty Kelley "The Family" - Book Details & Current Information
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=132&topic_id=795121&mesg_id=795121

Public Sites we are Involved
Democratic Underground: http://www.democraticunderground.com
Media Matters for America: http://mediamatters.org
Kerry-Edwards OnLine Forum: http://forum.johnkerry.com
* Kerry-Edwards Rapid Response Center
.....Official Press Releases on SBVT: http://blog.johnkerry.com/rapidresponse

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hippiegranny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-14-04 02:48 PM
Response to Original message
8. it's the CREDIBILITY, stupid!
This administration has so far gotten away with having a total and complete lack of credibility. I don't know why it took the dragging up of the AWOL ancient history to finally bring it to the forefront... but I'm glad something finally has!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Moderator DU Moderator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-14-04 06:22 PM
Response to Original message
9. dennis4868
Per DU copyright rules
please post only four
paragraphs from the
copyrighted news source.


Thank you.



DU Moderator
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 07:47 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC