Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Is 36,000 people personal enough yet, beyond just an abstraction?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Kurt_and_Hunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-08 09:39 PM
Original message
Is 36,000 people personal enough yet, beyond just an abstraction?
Edited on Fri Dec-19-08 09:51 PM by Kurt_and_Hunter
Why the big deal about Rick Warren? Why the big deal about prop 8? You gays are over-sensitive whiners... you talk about supporting Prop 8 like is was actually evil or something.

How does the prospect of the state forcing 36,000 happily and LEGALLY married people to get divorced against their will grab anyone? (Actually divorce would be better since at least that would acknowledge they were ever married instead of this Orwellian thing where their wedding never happened.)

I would hope this shows why some of us were aghast at Proposition 8 beyond other same-sex marriage initiatives. There are real, specific practical victims. It's not just about whether America is ready for something in the abstract. (Note who's leading the legal effort... famed "no political motivation" Clinton prosecutor Ken Starr.)
Prop. 8 sponsors seek to nullify 18K gay marriages
Source: San Francisco Chronicle

The sponsors of Proposition 8 asked the California Supreme Court on Friday to nullify the marriages of the estimated 18,000 same-sex couples who exchanged vows before voters approved the ballot initiative that outlawed gay unions.

The Yes on 8 campaign filed a brief arguing that because the new law holds that only marriages between a man and a woman are recognized or valid in California, the state can no longer recognize the existing same-sex unions.

"Proposition 8's brevity is matched by its clarity. There are no conditional clauses, exceptions, exemptions or exclusions," reads the brief co-written by Pepperdine University law school dean Kenneth Starr, the former independent counsel who investigated President Bill Clinton.

The campaign submitted the document in response to three lawsuits seeking to invalidate Proposition 8, a constitutional amendment adopted last month that overruled the court's decision in May that briefly legalized gay marriage in the nation's most populous state.

http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/n/a/2008/12/19/state/n150241S64.DTL&tsp=1

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=102x3652965
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Liberal Veteran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-08 09:41 PM
Response to Original message
1. So it wasn't the Mormons?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kurt_and_Hunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-08 09:43 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. The LDS provided a big chunk of funding but I don't think they initiated the prop. itself.
???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jackeens Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-08 09:42 PM
Response to Original message
2. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JohnnieGordon Donating Member (415 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-08 10:48 PM
Response to Original message
4. Don't forget all the children involved
The type of gay couples that get married often have children. Can you imagine the state ripping apart your parents' marriage? Whoa..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kurt_and_Hunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-20-08 12:40 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. always a good point
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 06:33 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC