Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

OBAMA NEEDS TO PAY URGENT ATTENTION TO BAILING OUT RETAIL SECTOR

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Morpheal Donating Member (145 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-09-08 10:29 AM
Original message
OBAMA NEEDS TO PAY URGENT ATTENTION TO BAILING OUT RETAIL SECTOR
Keep in mind that retail needs an urgent bailout.

Late autumn and early winter sales statistics, (and that includes actual profit margins after
costs are deducted from sales not simply panic sell off of severely discounted or very low margin
items to create volume of sales without profits), are what keep the retail sector alive
during the dismal after Boxing Day mid to late winter traditional slump. Total dollars of sales
are not a reliable or meaningful statistic. You can sell billions of dollars in goods, but lose your
shirt in the process, if margins are nonexistent on the bottom line. Bottom line visibility is not
one of the immediate economic indicator that it should be. Consumer spend, in total dollars,
is what politicians tend to measure the economy on. That is, in this crisis, very misleading.
Unfortunately the bottom line numbers do not tend to get published into public view, in the
month that they occur. Often they are severely delayed and usually fairly obscure numbers.

Without solid revenues in November and December, coming into January means total disaster,
with no hope for many to meet their fiscal obligations to get through the traditional slump.
Those stuck with excess inventory, and having to sell off at below cost, simply to reduce debt,
are in even worse shape to weather through the latter part of January and most of February and
March. This is even more true of the mom and pop shop, the small entrepreneur, the independent
business, or loosely affiliated franchisee or owner in a group of independent merchants. Many a
franchise, though providing services to franchisees (that they must pay for regardless of their
current revenue situation), is largely an independent entity relying on its own sales revenue for
its survival, quite apart from the brand name on the chain as a whole. Unfortunately a franchise
is often more constrained as to business practices, and while this works well enough in good or
average times, when tough times hit, the franchise can find itself hog tied to practices that are
expensive and inadequate in terms of the changed situation.

In many parts of the country the winter slump also means the highest costs for heating,
which adds to the cost of keeping retail doors open. There are fixed costs for energy, rent or
lease payments for premises and sometimes equipment, inventory carrying costs, and
necessary maintenance. Even cutting costs to the bare bones, leaves significant bills to pay,
and the typical "mom and pop" enterprise is at best a courageous effort, but in tough times
it becomes an unjust form of struggle. Nevertheless many are dependent for their incomes
on exactly that.

One of the increasing dangers of the rise of the electronic mall, and internet shopping, has been
the destructive impact upon society of a desocialized, depersonalized mode of commerce. In the
past the social element, personalized connection with the long time owners, who were more
friends than simply proprietors of a business, was at the core of North American life. The electronic
mall has eroded that vital institution, and continues to cause immense, perhaps irreparable damage
to society. In some significant instances personalized, social, shopping was one of the main forms
of social connection, for many people. Without that society itself becomes increasingly dysfunctional
and unable to replace that element within society with any suitable and effective alternative.

The economic downturn further threatens that same institution, along with the effect of large
high pressure, high volume, discounters and superstores, where shopping sometimes offers some
fiscal advantage, but is otherwise far from being a pleasant experience, socially and psychologically.
Those megastores cannot meet the same needs. Not to mention that they exist on relatively small
margins supported only by their more massive buying power. Nevertheless, the megastores cannot
replace the institution of "mom and pop" enterprises, of family run businesses, where social
and personal connection were at the core of commercial transactions.

Without government intervention we can anticipate near total destruction of that vital social
element, which has been a valued and valuable social institution at the core of North American life.
When even the megastores are in a condition of economic adversity, unable to make margins
sufficient to keep open the doors, mom and pop rarely stand any chance at all. The family business,
and thus the American dream of "free enterprise" and entrepreneurship is threatened with becoming
as dead as the dodo, an extinct species, and merely a historical artifact with no more practical
relevance to the changing economic scene. Can society afford that loss ? I would say no, it cannot.
The sociological and psychological impact of that loss would be too devastating, and the long term
political damage would be irreparable.

Government will have to step in to help the retail sector survive this one.

Right now there is no other way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
theophilus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-09-08 10:41 AM
Response to Original message
1. Providing millions of good jobs and the resultant upswing
in consumer confidence will be a good first step. This will happen in the first half of 09. The public, and business, will see it coming in the first week after Mr. Obama is sworn in.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gristy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-09-08 11:07 AM
Response to Original message
2. YOU WANT HIM TO BUY SHIT?
I don't see this, nor do I see any necessity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Alter Ego Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-09-08 11:08 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Hell, Lewis Black says to BUY SHIT.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nosillies Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-09-08 11:17 AM
Response to Original message
4. Those aren't industrial/union jobs, so they don't matter.
People who work in retail don't fabricate stuff. They aren't vital to national defense. And they don't have a long history of...something or other. Therefore, their impending doom just really doesn't matter so much.

:sarcasm:

Your post is very well-expressed, but I doubt you'll get much support here, unfortunately.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
high density Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-09-08 11:21 AM
Response to Original message
5. Everybody's sales are down
Autos
Retail
B2B
Airlines
Housing

Short of nationalizing everything, businesses have to find their own way to cope for the near term. Most are doing that by way of layoffs. Unfortunately it seems this could simply snowball us into something even worse since people without jobs obviously cannot pour money into our consumer-based economy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bunnies Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-09-08 11:23 AM
Response to Original message
6. Tough shit.
I'm sick and fucking tired of my tax dollars going to save every damn company with their hand out. Bail the PEOPLE out and the people will buy shit. I've had it with this crap.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tabbycat31 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-09-08 11:47 AM
Response to Reply #6
8. exactly
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-09-08 11:25 AM
Response to Original message
7. This doesn't make any sense
One of the increasing dangers of the rise of the electronic mall, and internet shopping, has been the destructive impact upon society of a desocialized, depersonalized mode of commerce. In the past the social element, personalized connection with the long time owners, who were more friends than simply proprietors of a business, was at the core of North American life. The electronic mall has eroded that vital institution, and continues to cause immense, perhaps irreparable damage to society. In some significant instances personalized, social, shopping was one of the main forms of social connection, for many people. Without that society itself becomes increasingly dysfunctional and unable to replace that element within society with any suitable and effective alternative.


Obama should bail out the retail sector because times are changing and to promote social connections?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 05:18 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC