|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
ben_meyers (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-24-08 09:48 PM Original message |
Bill Clinton Signs Repeal of Glass-Steagall |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PBS Poll-435 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-24-08 09:53 PM Response to Original message |
1. The bill that Clinton signed was passed overwhelmingly. VETO PROOF |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ben_meyers (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-24-08 10:13 PM Response to Reply #1 |
4. And dosen't that make it even worse? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Midwestern Democrat (238 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-24-08 10:18 PM Response to Reply #1 |
6. What a difference a decade makes. The repeal of Glass Stegall had |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NorCalDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-24-08 10:33 PM Response to Reply #6 |
18. Republican house/senate, "contract with America" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JVS (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-24-08 10:46 PM Response to Reply #6 |
23. 3rd way. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Skwmom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-25-08 08:04 AM Response to Reply #1 |
42. Not before it went to conference committee. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Laelth (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-25-08 08:28 PM Response to Reply #42 |
48. Clinton fought against the party WAY too often. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
elleng (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-24-08 10:02 PM Response to Original message |
2. The 'CHANGE' is |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PBS Poll-435 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-24-08 10:09 PM Response to Reply #2 |
3. The absolute biggest problem was the lack of regulatory oversight |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ben_meyers (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-24-08 10:15 PM Response to Reply #3 |
5. No, the biggest problem was that the effective regulations |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
elleng (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-24-08 10:19 PM Response to Reply #5 |
9. That's what happens when the 'enabling' legislation is repealed. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PBS Poll-435 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-24-08 10:20 PM Response to Reply #5 |
10. There is a reason that we have oversight committees and a Bureaucracy |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
elleng (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-24-08 10:23 PM Response to Reply #10 |
12. Bureaucracy cannot enforce something |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PBS Poll-435 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-24-08 10:29 PM Response to Reply #12 |
15. Disagree with you there. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
elleng (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-24-08 10:42 PM Response to Reply #15 |
19. 'Regulatory rulings' are based on SOMETHING, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Blarch (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-26-08 06:48 AM Response to Reply #5 |
53. I agree. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
elleng (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-24-08 10:18 PM Response to Reply #3 |
7. dupe |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
elleng (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-24-08 10:18 PM Response to Reply #3 |
8. dupe |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rockymountaindem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-24-08 10:26 PM Response to Reply #2 |
13. If we know it's a mistake, why are we still seeking the advice of it's biggest proponents |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
elleng (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-24-08 10:44 PM Response to Reply #13 |
21. Glass-Steagal repeal was advocated by MANY |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rockymountaindem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-24-08 10:53 PM Response to Reply #21 |
25. I could ask you "if your friends all jumped off a cliff, would you?" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
elleng (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-24-08 11:12 PM Response to Reply #25 |
28. Should we be thinking about 'rewards' for some, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rockymountaindem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-24-08 11:17 PM Response to Reply #28 |
29. Do you see the contradiction in what you just said? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
elleng (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-24-08 11:35 PM Response to Reply #29 |
30. I'm not aware of any who have been 'proven right' on making the mess, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
elleng (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-25-08 02:47 AM Response to Reply #29 |
38. Just saw this: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Skwmom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-25-08 08:12 AM Response to Reply #28 |
44. They have a track record of creating messes, not fixing them. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
anonymous171 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-24-08 10:21 PM Response to Original message |
11. Shows the importance of congress. We control congress. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ben_meyers (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-24-08 10:27 PM Response to Reply #11 |
14. I don't pin any of it on Clinton |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
anonymous171 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-24-08 10:31 PM Original message |
I see your point. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Skip Intro (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-24-08 11:03 PM Response to Reply #14 |
27. Except in your OP, where you try to pin it on Clinton. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NorCalDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-24-08 10:31 PM Response to Original message |
16. Yeah, it's all Clinton's fault |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ben_meyers (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-24-08 10:43 PM Response to Reply #16 |
20. See # 14 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NorCalDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-25-08 11:57 AM Response to Reply #20 |
47. Okay, i see your point |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Marrah_G (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-25-08 08:01 AM Response to Reply #16 |
41. The OP doesn't give a shit about reality |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Raineyb (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-25-08 09:45 AM Response to Reply #16 |
45. He didn't have to sign it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AtomicKitten (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-24-08 10:31 PM Response to Original message |
17. Yikes! Is that Phil Graham? I oppose anything he applauds. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cliffordu (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-24-08 10:44 PM Response to Original message |
22. Where's the change in your sniveling and pre-condemnation of the |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ben_meyers (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-24-08 11:38 PM Response to Reply #22 |
31. I haven't surrounded him with the same gang of idiots |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cliffordu (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-24-08 11:42 PM Response to Reply #31 |
33. Could be they will unfuck it under orders from the POTUS..... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RollWithIt (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-24-08 10:49 PM Response to Original message |
24. That bill was veto proof.... doesn't excuse the photo-op, but it's hard to pin that on him.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tomp (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-25-08 08:09 AM Response to Reply #24 |
43. that just confirms my belief.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HughMoran (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-24-08 10:54 PM Response to Original message |
26. Flaming idiot |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jennicut (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-24-08 11:39 PM Response to Original message |
32. The problem is not the repeal of the law but how Wall St. was allowed to take advantage of it under |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Radical Activist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-24-08 11:44 PM Response to Original message |
34. Guilt by association was lame for William Ayers |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Onlooker (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-24-08 11:54 PM Response to Original message |
35. This is right wing garbage |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jennicut (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-24-08 11:59 PM Response to Reply #35 |
36. Bush allowed the country to be bankrupted. He allowed |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hippo_Tron (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-25-08 12:24 AM Response to Original message |
37. The bill was veto proof, he had three options... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Marrah_G (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-25-08 07:59 AM Response to Reply #37 |
40. I am sure the OP knows that- spreading RW talking points is WAY more fun though |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Raineyb (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-25-08 09:49 AM Response to Reply #37 |
46. That's how I see it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hippo_Tron (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-26-08 04:43 AM Response to Reply #46 |
50. You do indeed open yourself up to criticism when you take a photo op |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Marrah_G (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-25-08 07:58 AM Response to Original message |
39. Thanks for spreading the RW BS here. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zhade (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-25-08 09:00 PM Response to Original message |
49. A mistake. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bridgit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-26-08 04:54 AM Response to Original message |
51. Mm hm, but the yada-yada component was that Johnson tinkered with the notion... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mdmc (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-26-08 05:27 AM Response to Original message |
52. Is the the 2009 cabinet? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Vinca (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-26-08 07:21 AM Response to Original message |
54. He should have vetoed it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mtnsnake (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-26-08 07:50 AM Response to Original message |
55. Yeah the economic collapse, Iraq War, & poor response to Katrina are Bill's fault, not Bush's |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Thu Apr 25th 2024, 01:50 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC