Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Telecom Chief Says Industry Should Be Scared of Obama's Plans for an Open Internet

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
BurtWorm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-14-08 10:43 AM
Original message
Telecom Chief Says Industry Should Be Scared of Obama's Plans for an Open Internet
:applause:

Gobama!



http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/11/13/AR2008111303830_pf.html

By Cecilia Kang
Washington Post Staff Writer
Friday, November 14, 2008; D02

President-elect Barack Obama famously made the Web a pillar of his campaign, so it is not surprising that the man called the nation's first "wired" president has championed the idea of an open Internet.

And that is what Sprint Nextel chief executive Dan Hesse said recently "should scare" the telecom industry the most.

Republican lawmakers and technology regulators have fought the idea of an open Internet, or net neutrality, calling it a "solution in search of a problem." But it is widely expected that Obama will make net neutrality and access to broadband in rural and poor areas a key part of his agenda to close economic divides and help spur job creation.

The task of translating net neutrality -- the notion put forth by academics that network operators should be banned from slowing, blocking or degrading Internet content and technologies -- could likely fall under the Federal Communications Commission, business leaders and analysts said.

The FCC has been criticized by consumer groups for trailing technology changes in the marketplace by grappling with reforms on landline programs and falling short on consumer protections and rules for wireless operators. Under the Obama administration, however, many high-tech leaders and analysts say the agency first formed to hand out broadcast licenses will be more important than ever.

"There is going to be a sea change. Technology has been primarily ignored by the Bush administration but Obama from the beginning made it a central part of his push for change," said Maura Corbett, a partner at Qorvis, a tech public relations firm. "He understands that technology has a multiplier effect on the economy and that is something we've never needed more right now."


...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
grannie4peace Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-14-08 10:44 AM
Response to Original message
1. he's our man!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Alter Ego Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-14-08 10:46 AM
Response to Original message
2. The Internet Is For Porn
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
av8rdave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-14-08 10:46 AM
Response to Original message
3. I suppose a telecom chief WOULD be concerned
This could hamstring their efforts to control the internet and extract maximum profit from it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DrToast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-14-08 10:52 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. Yep, any policies that scare telecom chiefs work for me!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BanzaiBonnie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-14-08 11:15 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. Me too
Edited on Fri Nov-14-08 11:16 AM by BanzaiBonnie
Pretty much any time an industry that stands to profit from an action says, "This is a bad thing", we know that the reality is that it's a good thing.


I will NEVER forget the lesson from the insurance industry in Washington State. They told us that if we enacted a law requiring everyone to have auto insurance that our auto insurance rates would go down. THEY LIED. We never saw any relief in our rates.

And there are still uninsured drivers. Then there is the problem of people ending up in jail over the issue and WE, the taxpayers, pay for that.

Fool me once... not gonna fool me again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joanne98 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-14-08 10:49 AM
Response to Original message
4. YAY
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 09:39 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC