Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Stevens verdict likely to inch Dems closer to Magic 60

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
The Hope Mobile Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-27-08 10:36 PM
Original message
Stevens verdict likely to inch Dems closer to Magic 60
Source: cnn.com

Stevens verdict likely to inch Dems closer to 'magic 60′
Posted: 11:08 PM ET

From CNN Ticker Producer Alexander Mooney.

(CNN) – Ted Steven's guilty verdict Monday afternoon could mean the end of the Alaska lawmaker's 40-year tenure in the Senate and serve to inch the already emboldened Democratic Party closer to 60 seats in the Senate, recent polls of the Alaska race suggest.

In an Ivan Moore Research poll of the Alaska Senate race conducted earlier this month, entirely before the verdict was handed down, Stevens and Democratic challenger Mark Begich were statistically tied. Several other recent surveys have also suggested the race is neck-and-neck.

But the prospect of Stevens, first elected to the Senate in 1968, facing a tough reelection race was unthinkable only a few months ago. After all, the last Democrat elected to the U.S. Senate from Alaska is former presidential candidate Mike Gravel. Gravel served two terms, from 1969 to 1981, before embarking on his unsuccessful presidential bid 26 years later. Stevens is also an icon in the state, responsible (and now infamous) for securing billions of federal dollars for the state, including the ill-fated "bridge to nowhere."

But Steven's reelection hopes now appear increasingly slim in what is a boost to Democrats seeking to reach the filibuster-proof 60 seat majority. It's also too late for the GOP to replace Stevens on the ballot with a different candidate — that deadline passed more than six weeks ago and the ballots have already been printed.

“This race was a dead heat before Stevens was convicted,” said CNN Senior Political Researcher Alan Silverleib. "The Democrats are now most likely one step closer to a filibuster-proof majority of 60 Senate seats next January.”

Meanwhile, asked if there is likely to be any national political impact of the Stevens verdict, a prominent Republican strategist close to the McCain campaign said, "Just one more seat."

"It can't really impact a national environment where 12 percent say things going well," the strategist told CNN's John King.


No link yet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
kirby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-27-08 10:47 PM
Response to Original message
1. Dont worry Lieberman will still be the screw-up. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LynnTheDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-27-08 11:02 PM
Response to Original message
2. Just wait til the Palin (2nd) verdict!
I'm sure she'll not read it, either, and declare herself "cleared of any wrong-doing".

:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jwirr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-27-08 11:23 PM
Response to Original message
3. Isn't 60 a veto proof senate? With a Democratic president we shouldn't
need the full 60. That said I would be very happy if we could get it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hosnon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-27-08 11:32 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. 67 is a veto proof Senate. But you are correct that the threat of a veto
Edited on Mon Oct-27-08 11:34 PM by MJDuncan1982
is not the problem (assuming, of course, an Obama/Biden victory).

The problem is a procedural rule in the Senate known as a filibuster, which requires 60 votes to end. In many ways, not having 60 is like not having 51.

But with 60, every piece of legislation that the Democrats want to push through will meet little to no resistance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jwirr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-27-08 11:42 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Thank you. I did not understand that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hosnon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-27-08 11:55 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. Sure thing. That's what the whole hubbub surrounding the "nuclear option" was
about a few years back.

51 can simply vote to change the 60 vote filibuster rule with a simple majority vote. But that's a big no-no and only to be used in extreme circumstances (hence the name).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dysfunctional press Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-27-08 11:45 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. the 40 or fewer repugs that are left will be VERY dispirited...
some may even contemplate retirement.
a repug without power to abuse is a sad and pitiful thing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 09:34 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC