Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Kerry's words prolonged the misery of Vietman POWs

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
midwayer Donating Member (719 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-07-04 02:36 PM
Original message
Kerry's words prolonged the misery of Vietman POWs
Guest commentary: Kerry's words prolonged the misery of Vietman POWs

By WAYNE SMITH, Special to the Daily News
September 7, 2004

"Hanoi Hanna" was screeching away on the awful squawk box in my four-walled POW stench. She was directing her babble to servicemen who were still engaged in the conflict. "GIs lay down your weapons and revolt. Do not be the last soldier to die for a cause that Americans think is unjust."

This is a paraphrase but the theme was repeated often late in my internment in the 1970s. I could not recollect it at the time but I found out after my repatriation that these same words were the hallmark of John Kerry's 1971 testimony before the Fulbright Committee: "How do you ask a man to be the last man to die for a mistake?"

more...............

http://www.naplesnews.com/npdn/pe_local_guest_commentary/article/0,2071,NPDN_14963_3164331,00.html


&


Thomas Sowell: Vets vs. Kerry on Vietnam: The media should check the facts

http://www.naplesnews.com/npdn/perspective/article/0,2071,NPDN_14966_3163015,00.html

The Naples Daily News TRASHED KERRY TODAY

Thank the Lord they DID print Molly Ivins...but the majority of today was bias towards the GOP machine.

This Vietnam thing is going to kill us if we can't rebut.

HELP!

Have been working all day.....

need rebuttals

Mid
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
midwayer Donating Member (719 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-07-04 02:37 PM
Response to Original message
1. Molly Ivins: Kerry accused of saying things he never said
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jumpstart33 Donating Member (328 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-07-04 06:12 PM
Response to Reply #1
16. Had they heeded Kerry's words, it would have saves thousands of lives.
Why doesn't Kerry point that out?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
A_Possum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-07-04 02:41 PM
Response to Original message
2. POW can thank Kerry for trying to getting him home at all
Nixon was just stalling around so he wouldn't have to admit he was the first American president to lose a war.

*************


Kerry, the Congressional Record, 1971

The Chairman: Do you support or do you have any particular views about any one of them you wish to give the committee?

Mr. Kerry: My feeling, Senator, is undoubtedly this Congress, and I don't mean to sound pessimistic, but I do not believe that this Congress will, in fact, end the war as we would like to, which is immediately and unilaterally and, therefore, if I were to speak I would say we would set a date and the date obviously would be the earliest possible date. But I would like to say, in answering that, that I do not believe it is necessary to stall any longer. I have been to Paris. I have talked with both delegations at the peace talks, that is to say the Democratic Republic of Vietnam and the Provisional Revolutionary Government and of all eight of Madam Binh's points it has been stated time and time again, and was stated by Senator Vance Hartke when he returned from Paris, and it has been stated by many other officials of this Government, if the United States were to set a date for withdrawal the prisoners of war would be returned. (The same POW's who were so "devastated" by this attempt to get them freed sooner rather than later?)

I think this negates very clearly the argument of the President that we have to maintain a presence in Vietnam, to use as a negotiating block for the return of those prisoners. The setting of a date will accomplish that...


...what I am saying is that I believe that there is a mood in this country which I know you are aware of and you have been one of the strongest critics of this war for the longest time. But I think if can talk in this legislative body about filibustering for porkbarrel programs, then we should start now to talk about filibustering for the saving of lives and of our country. (Applause.)

And this, Mr. Chairman, is what we are trying to convey.

*******

These POW's seem to be blaming Kerry for what their captors did to them, instead of blaming Nixon for making them spend longer as POW's.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
displacedtexan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-07-04 02:41 PM
Response to Original message
3. Opposition to the police action in Vietnam...
was the only action which brought it to an end.

Without opposition, many more would have been wounded, killed, or captured.

Duh.

"Hanoi Hanna" didn't report anything in that statement that wasn't a true reflection of majority sentiment in the USA at the time.

I guess we should have kept quiet about Apartheid, too. After all, Dick Cheney didn't want that little policy to end, either.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CarolynEC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-07-04 02:41 PM
Response to Original message
4. John Kerry put his life on the line for our country...
... then, in yet another act of true courage, came back and tried to save the lives of his fellow soldiers.

It's that simple.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catfight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-07-04 02:43 PM
Response to Original message
5. Let's Move ON folks, Kerry served, Bush deserted, end of story!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ducks In A Row Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-07-04 02:43 PM
Response to Original message
6. What a lie
pure and simple.

now what about iraq, wayne. how you feel about 1000 soliders dying for nothing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LynnTheDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-07-04 02:43 PM
Response to Original message
7. Debunked
100% absolutely totally UNTRUE.

I have links, will look them out for you asap.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cheshire Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-07-04 02:44 PM
Response to Original message
8. If anyone thinks that Vietcong would have done less than they did
no matter what is/are just fucking stupid as hell.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-07-04 02:45 PM
Response to Original message
9. Iraq soldiers can thank bush* for trashing thier purple hearts
Edited on Tue Sep-07-04 02:46 PM by spanone
for political gain
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leetrisck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-07-04 02:46 PM
Response to Original message
10. And probably saved their lives
along with a lot of others - guess the Republicans would have been happier with 75,000 names on The Wall and now bush wants his very own wall - the miserable little deserter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-07-04 02:51 PM
Response to Original message
11. John Kerry loves his country
And in the same way as Paul said in First Corinthians, Love does not rejoice in falsehood, but Love rejoices in the truth (1 Cor 13). The truth then and now is that some United States soldiers committed war crimes. Those crimes tarnished every man and woman in uniform as long as they went unpublicized and unpunished. The only people who would want to cover up or deny those crimes are either complicit in them, or don't care about the truth, and therefore don't care about the reputation of the United States or the military.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
midwayer Donating Member (719 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-07-04 05:43 PM
Response to Original message
12. Thanks ALL who responded
I'm hoping we will get some good rebuttals from the locals printed in the paper or some opposing guest editorials as well here in the next couple of days.

The pugs are going to hammer us with this issue

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blondeatlast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-07-04 05:45 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. They keep trying, but then are swiftly
booted out of DU.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-07-04 05:56 PM
Response to Original message
14. Kerry brought them home sooner. Did they really want to stay longer?
Were they wanting their younger brothers and cousins and nephews to join them?

The American people were already against the war when Kerry spoke about the testimony from the soldiers who met a few months earlier. He repeated their words.

Kerry aimed his testimony at an indecisive congress who didn't know HOW to get out of a war they had already lost.

Let them chew on that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
brentspeak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-07-04 06:03 PM
Response to Original message
15. POW disputes SwiftVet POW claims
Edited on Tue Sep-07-04 06:04 PM by brentspeak
Partial Article:

Phil Butler, who spent eight years as a prisoner of war in Vietnam,
took issue with suggestions by Swift Boat Veterans for Truth that
Kerry's antiwar protests caused the POWs to be treated badly. "I lived
with two of the POWs who are now in that group -- Mr. Courdier
and Mr. Gallanti -- and I am telling you, they are full of it.
We never heard a blooming thing about John Kerry while we were there,"
said Butler, who contacted the campaign months ago to support Kerry
and only recently heard back from Kerry's veterans coordinator, John
Hurley.

Butler said that while he was tortured and mistreated until 1969, by
the time Kerry was protesting the war and speaking before the Senate
Armed Services Committee in 1971, the POWs were better treated.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A26519-2004Aug23.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 11:59 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC